切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 183 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.02.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

急性脑卒中患者发生卒中相关性肺炎危险因素临床分析
王德生1, 苏庆杰1, 龙发青1, 李羲2, 周向东2, 王杰2,()   
  1. 1. 570311 海口,海南医学院第二附属医院神经内科
    2. 570102 海口,海南医学院第一附属医院呼吸内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-18 出版日期:2017-04-20
  • 通信作者: 王杰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81660010)

Clinical analysis in risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infraction

Desheng Wang1, Qingjie Su1, Faqing Long1, Xi Li2, Xiangdong Zhou2, Jie Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Neurology Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570311, China
    2. Department of Respiratory Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570102, China
  • Received:2017-01-18 Published:2017-04-20
  • Corresponding author: Jie Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jie, Email:
引用本文:

王德生, 苏庆杰, 龙发青, 李羲, 周向东, 王杰. 急性脑卒中患者发生卒中相关性肺炎危险因素临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 183-186.

Desheng Wang, Qingjie Su, Faqing Long, Xi Li, Xiangdong Zhou, Jie Wang. Clinical analysis in risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infraction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(02): 183-186.

目的

探讨急性脑卒中患者发生卒中相关性肺炎(SAP)的危险因素,以降低SAP的发生率。

方法

收集2012年1月至2016年6月,在海南医学院第二附属医院神经内科就诊的380例急性脑卒中患者病例资料,根据是否发生卒中相关性肺炎(SAP)将其分为SAP组(69例)和非SAP组(311例),比较两组间差异,并分析SAP的相关危险因素。

结果

收集的380例急性脑卒中患者中,SAP的发生率为18.15%(69/380);单因素分析比较两组患者的临床特征,发现年龄≥65岁,意识障碍,吞咽困难,卧床,糖尿病,慢性支气管炎都是SAP发生的相关因素,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);OR值由高到低排序:意识障碍、吞咽困难、慢性支气管炎、糖尿病、年龄≥65岁、卧床;多因素非条件logistic回归分析,结果显示年龄≥65岁、意识障碍、吞咽困难、卧床、糖尿病、慢性支气管炎是急性脑卒中发生SAP的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

SAP的发生有很多相关危险因素,通过控制及改善急性脑卒中患者发生SAP的高危因素,采取积极正确的防治措施,可降低急性脑卒中患者患SAP的发生率,改善预后。

Objective

To analyze the risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia(SAP) in patients with acute cerebral infraction. For reducing the morbidity of SAP.

Methods

Collected case data of 380 inpatients with acute cerebral infraction in our department from January 2012 to June 2016. The patients were divided into two groups, 69 patients complicated with SAP were served as case group, and 311 patients did not complicated with SAP were served as control group. To analyze the risk factors of SAP after comparing the differences of case data between the two groups.

Results

The morbidity of SAP was 18.15% (69/380)in patients with acute cerebral infraction. Single factor analysis the clinical characteristics of two groups, the risk factors associated with SAP including age equal or over 65 years, disturbance of consciousness, dysphagia, lie in bed, diabetes mellitus, chronic bronchitis. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). OR value from high to low order: disturbance of consciousness, dysphagia, chronic bronchitis, diabetes mellitus, age equal or over 65 years, lie in bed. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analyses, the result showed above the reasons are independent risk factors for SAP.

Conclusion

There were many reliated risk factors causing SAP. To control and improve these factors, SAP in patient with acute cerebral infraction could be prevented or cured, and the morbidity would be reduced.

表1 两组患者临床特征的比较[n(%)]
表2 急性脑卒中患者发生SAP危险因素的非条件多因素Logistic回归分析
1
卒中相关性肺炎诊治中国专家共识组. 卒中相关性肺炎诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志,2010, 49(12): 1075-1078.
2
黄其密,惠俊兰,刘唯佳,等. 老年脑卒中患者上消化道出血与肺部感染的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(3): 324-326.
3
Liu L, Wang D, Wong KS, et al. Stroke and stroke care in China: huge burden, significant workload,and a national priority[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(12): 3651-3654.
4
Hamidon BB, Raymond AA. Risk factors and complications of acute ischemic stroke patients at Hospital University Kebangsaan Malaysia ( HUKM) [J]. Med J Malaysia, 2003, 58(4): 499-505.
5
Kstzan IL, Cebul RD, Husak SH, et al. The effect of pneumonia on morality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke[J]. Neurology, 2003, 60(4): 620-625.
6
Smith CJ, Kishore AK, Vail A, et al. Diagnosis of stroke-associated pneumonia: recommendations from the pneumonia in stroke consensus group[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(8): 2335-2340.
7
Hilker R, Poetter C, Findeisen N, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia after acute stroke: implications for neurological intensive care medicine[J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(4): 975-981.
8
Walter U, Kolbaske S, Patejdl R, et al. Insular stroke is associated with acute sympathetic hyperactivation and immunodepression[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2013, 20(1): 153-159.
9
Kamel H, Iadecola C. Brain-immune interactions and ischemic stroke:clinical implications[J]. Arch Neurol, 2012, 69(5): 576-581.
10
Chamorro A, Meisel A, Planas AM, et al. The immunology of acute stroke[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2012, 8(7): 401-410.
11
Zhao H, Lin G, Shi M, et al. The mechanism of neurogenic pulmonary edema in epilepsy[J]. J Physiol Sci, 2014, 64(1): 65-72.
12
Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence,diagnosis,and pulmonary complications[J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(12): 2756-2763.
13
González-Fernández M, Ottenstein L, Atanelov L, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: an overview[J]. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep, 2013, 1(3): 187-196.
14
黄其密,惠俊兰,刘唯佳,等. 老年脑卒中患者上消化道出血与肺部感染的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(3): 324-326.
15
陆媛,徐金富,梁兴伦,等. 老年卒中相关性肺炎患者病原菌分布与耐药性分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2015, 25(3): 537-539.
16
Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y, et al. Novel risk score to predict pneumonia after acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44 (5): 1303-1309.
17
Li L, Zhang LH, Xu WP, et al. Risk assessment of ischemic stroke associated pneumonia[J]. World J Emerg Med, 2014, 5(3): 209-213.
18
张俞,葛晓麟,贡伟,等. 卒中相关性肺炎的临床特点及预测因子[J]. 中国现代医生,2012, 5(28): 24-25.
19
汪坚敏,吴莘,钱立,等. 卒中相关性肺炎危险因素的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(19): 5829-5830.
20
张淑霞,潘晓华,刘国荣,等. 卒中相关性肺炎的发病机制及预测因素的研究进展[J]. 医学综述,2016, 22(23): 4637-4640.
21
刘淑媛,张永喜,袁娟,等. 老年脑卒中相关性肺炎多重耐药菌感染的危险因素及病原学分析[J]. 中国老年学,2014, 34(3): 599-600.
22
唐莉,金燕. 脑卒中患者合并肺部多重耐药菌感染的临床护理[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(5): 645-647.
23
温德良,李智博,温艺超,等. 重症监护病房脑卒中相关性肺炎多重耐药菌感染的危险因素及病原学分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2016, 32(13): 2178-2181.
24
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008[J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1): 296-327.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 吴令杰, 陈瑞烈, 肖湘明, 郭耿龙, 林钟滨, 张海生, 周敏, 陈妙华. 2005至2021年广东省汕头市某综合医院人类免疫缺陷病毒感染/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者流行病学特征及高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后生存状况影响因素[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 207-214.
[5] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要