血小板和白蛋白/纤维蛋白原比值在晚期非小细胞肺癌贝伐珠单抗二线治疗的临床意义

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.01.007

目的

分析血小板(platelet, PLT)、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen, FIB)和白蛋白/纤维蛋白原(albumin/fibrinogen, ALB/FIB)对接受贝伐珠单抗二线治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析我院收治的91例接受贝伐珠单抗二线治疗的晚期NSCLC患者临床和血液参数。PLT、FIB和ALB/FIB根据贝伐珠单抗治疗前的血液检查结果，确定最佳截断值。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和COX回归分析与无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS)相关的因素。

结果

单因素分析显示基线PLT、FIB和ALB/FIB与PFS显著相关。多因素分析显示基线PLT和FIB不是PFS的预后因素，年龄(HR：1.719，95%CI：1.036～2.851，P＝0.036)、脑转移(HR：0.475，95%CI：0.269～0.840，P＝0.01)和既往手术(HR：0.479，95%CI：0.251～0.913，P＝0.025)是PFS的预后因素。多因素分析显示，治疗前高水平的ALB/FIB比值是较长PFS的预测因子(HR：0.118，95%CI：0.025～0.553，P＝0.007)。用X-tile软件确定基线PLT、FIB和ALB/FIB的最佳截断值分别为282、4.61和8.8。Kaplan-Meier分析显示：基线低PLT组患者PFS较基线高PLT组预后好(217 d vs. 386 d，P<0.001)，基线低FIB组患者PFS较基线高FIB组预后好(200 d vs. 337 d，P<0.001)，基线高ALB/FIB组患者PFS较基线低ALB/FIB组预后好(360 d vs. 183 d，P<0.001)。

结论

低水平的基线PLT、FIB和高水平的基线ALB/FIB提示在晚期NSCLC患者贝伐珠单抗二线治疗预后较好。

关键词: 晚期非小细胞肺癌, 贝伐珠单抗, 血小板, 白蛋白/纤维蛋白原比值, 预后因素

Objective

To study the effects of platelet (PLT), fibrinogen (FIB) and albumin / fibrinogen (ALB/FIB) on the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received second-line therapy with bevacizumab.

Methods

The baseline clinical characteristics and blood parameters of 91 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with bevacizumab in Qingdao Municipal Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. PLT, FIB and ALB/FIB are based on the latest blood test results before bevacizumab treatment to determine their best cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX regression analysis were used to analyze the factors related to progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Univariate analysis indicates a significant correlation between baseline PLT, FIB, ALB/FIB, and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis reveals that baseline PLT and FIB are not independent prognostic factors for PFS. Instead, age (HR: 1.719, 95%CI: 1.036-2.851, P=0.036), brain metastasis (HR: 0.475, 95%CI: 0.269-0.840, P=0.01), and prior surgery (HR: 0.479, 95%CI: 0.251-0.913, P=0.025) emerge as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Additionally, the analysis indicates that a high pre-treatment level of ALB/FIB ratio independently predicts longer PFS (HR: 0.118, 95%CI: 0.025-0.553, P=0.007). Utilizing X-tile software, the optimal cutoff values for baseline PLT, FIB, and ALB/FIB are determined to be 282, 4.61, and 8.8, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis reveals that patients in the baseline low platelet (PLT) group exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to those in the baseline high PLT group (217 d vs. 386 d, P<0.001). Similarly, patients in the baseline low fibrinogen (FIB) group demonstrate a superior prognosis compared to the baseline high FIB group (200 d vs. 337 d, P<0.001). Furthermore, patients in the baseline high albumin/fibrinogen (ALB/FIB) group exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the baseline low ALB/FIB group (360 d vs. 183 d, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Low levels of baseline PLT, FIB and high levels of baseline ALB/FIB may indicate a better prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with bevacizumab.

Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Bevacizumab, Platelet, Albumin/fibrinogen ratio, Prognostic factors

图1 91例晚期NSCLC患者无进展生存(PFS)的Kaplan-Meier分析。注：PLT：血小板；FIB：纤维蛋白原；ALB/FIB：白蛋白/纤维蛋白原比值

表1 晚期NSCLC患者PFS的单因素分析

临床资料	变　量	例数	风险比(95%可信区间)	P值
性别	男	55	1.253(0.819～1.918)	0.299
	女	36
年龄(岁)	<65	53	1.166(0.906～2.390)	0.481
	≥65	38
吸烟史	是	31	1.001(0.644～1.555)	0.998
	否	60
脑转移	是	26	0.543(0.315～0.937)	0.028^a
	否	65
胸膜转移	是	38	0.542(0.336～0.875)	0.012^a
	否	65
二线治疗方案	联合化疗	46	1.432(0.937～2.188)	0.097
	联合EGFR抑制剂	28	0.844(0.557～1.278)	0.422
	联合化疗和免疫	17	0.853(0.548～1.342)	0.501
既往手术	是	25	0.571(1.083～3.170)	0.024^a
	否	66
既往局部放疗	是	41	0.789(0.351～0.930)	0.270
	否	50
PLT	<282	66	2.552(1.557～4.184)	0.000^a
	≥282	25
FIB	<4.61	66	2.626(1.606～4.294)	0.000^a
	≥4.61	25
ALB/FIB(AFR)	<8.84	25	0.331(0.204～0.537)	0.000^a
	≥8.84	66

表1 晚期NSCLC患者PFS的单因素分析

临床资料	变　量	例数	风险比(95%可信区间)	P值
性别	男	55	1.253(0.819～1.918)	0.299
	女	36
年龄(岁)	<65	53	1.166(0.906～2.390)	0.481
	≥65	38
吸烟史	是	31	1.001(0.644～1.555)	0.998
	否	60
脑转移	是	26	0.543(0.315～0.937)	0.028^a
	否	65
胸膜转移	是	38	0.542(0.336～0.875)	0.012^a
	否	65
二线治疗方案	联合化疗	46	1.432(0.937～2.188)	0.097
	联合EGFR抑制剂	28	0.844(0.557～1.278)	0.422
	联合化疗和免疫	17	0.853(0.548～1.342)	0.501
既往手术	是	25	0.571(1.083～3.170)	0.024^a
	否	66
既往局部放疗	是	41	0.789(0.351～0.930)	0.270
	否	50
PLT	<282	66	2.552(1.557～4.184)	0.000^a
	≥282	25
FIB	<4.61	66	2.626(1.606～4.294)	0.000^a
	≥4.61	25
ALB/FIB(AFR)	<8.84	25	0.331(0.204～0.537)	0.000^a
	≥8.84	66

表2 晚期NSCLC患者的PFS多因素分析

变　量	风险比(95%可信区间)	P值
性别	1.171(0.649～2.115)	0.599
年龄	1.719(1.036～2.851)	0.036^a
吸烟史	0.714(0.404～1.263)	0.247
脑转移	0.475(0.269～0.840)	0.010^a
胸膜转移	1.165(0.675～2.012)	0.582
手术	0.479(0.251～0.913)	0.025^a
PLT	1.749(0.925～3.307)	0.085
FIB	0.298(0.059～1.500)	0.142
ALB/FIB	0.118(0.025～0.553)	0.007^a

表2 晚期NSCLC患者的PFS多因素分析

变　量	风险比(95%可信区间)	P值
性别	1.171(0.649～2.115)	0.599
年龄	1.719(1.036～2.851)	0.036^a
吸烟史	0.714(0.404～1.263)	0.247
脑转移	0.475(0.269～0.840)	0.010^a
胸膜转移	1.165(0.675～2.012)	0.582
手术	0.479(0.251～0.913)	0.025^a
PLT	1.749(0.925～3.307)	0.085
FIB	0.298(0.059～1.500)	0.142
ALB/FIB	0.118(0.025～0.553)	0.007^a

图2 X-tile软件确定的预处理血液参数的截断值。注：PLT：血小板；FIB：纤维蛋白原；ALB/FIB：白蛋白/纤维蛋白原比值。*P<0.05

1	王洪武，金发光. 晚期非小细胞肺癌多域整合治疗策略[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(4): 457-461.
2	Babar L, Modi P, Anjum F. Lung cancer screening. 2022 Jul 25. In: StatPearls[Internet]. Treasure island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
3	Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
4	Vachani A, Sequist LV, Spira A. AJRCCM: 100-year anniversary. The shifting landscape for lung cancer: Past, present, and future[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2017, 195(9): 1150-1160.
5	Duma N, Santana-Davila R, Molina JR. Non-small cell lung cancer：Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2019, 94(8): 1623-1640.
6	Sun X, Men Y, Hui ZG. Research status of neoadjuvant therapy for stage ⅢA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Chin JRadia Oncol, 2020, 29(1): 61-64.
7	Fu Q. Relationship between the expression of PDCD5 and NRP1 and the effect and prognosis of chemotherapy in NSCLC patients [J]. Practical JCancer, 2021, 36(6): 884-887.
8	Gautschi O, Rothschild SI, Li Q, et al. Bevacizumab plus pemetrexed versus pemetrexed Alone as Maintenance Therapy for Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-cell lung cancer: Update from the swiss group for clinical cancer research (SAKK) 19/09 Trial[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2017, 18(3): 303-309.
9	Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. BEYOND: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase Ⅲ study of first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or placebo in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(19): 2197-204.
10	Ramjiawan RR, Griffioen AW, Duda DG. Anti-angiogenesis for cancer revisited: Is there a role for combinations with immunotherapy？[J]. Angiogenesis, 2017, 20(2): 185-204.
11	Ding L, Liu K, Jiang Z, et al. The efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in previously treated patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (ns-NSCLC)[J]. Tumour Biol, 2015, 36(4): 2491-2499.
12	Tian Y, Zhai X, Tian H, et al. Bevacizumab in Combination with Pemetrexed and Platinum Significantly Improved the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Advanced Adenocarcinoma NSCLC and Brain Metastases[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 10083-10092.
13	Li X, Abbas M, Li Y, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Pemetrexed-platinum Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy for Treatment-naive Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in China[J]. Clin Ther, 2019, 41(3): 518-529.
14	Tsai CM, Au JS, Chang GC, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with chemotherapy in Asian patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC: results from the phase Ⅳ MO19390 (SAiL) study[J]. Thorac Oncol, 2011, 6(6): 1092-1097.
15	Jiang T, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab demonstrated survival benefit than EGFR-TKIs alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and multiple brain metastases[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2019, 121: 98-108.
16	Peng F, Hu D, Lin X, et al. The monocyte to red blood cell count ratio is a strong predictor of postoperative survival in colorectal cancer patients: The Fujian prospective investigation of cancer (FIESTA) study[J]. J Cancer, 2017, 8(6): 967-975.
17	Rachidi S, Metelli A, Riesenberg B, et al. Platelets subvert T cell immunity against cancer via GARP-TGFβ axis[J]. Sci Immunol, 2017, 2(11): eaai7911.
18	Lin MS, Huang JX, Zhu J, et al. Elevation of platelet count in patients with colorectal cancer predicts tendency to metastases and poor prognosis[J]. Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012, 59(118): 1687-1690.
19	Sheng L, Luo M, Sun X, et al. Serum fibrinogen is an independent prognostic factor in operable non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Inter JCancer, 2013, 133(11): 2720-2725.
20	Qi Y, Fu J. Research on the coagulation function changes in non small cell lung cancer patients and analysis of their correlation with metastasis and survival[J]. J BUON, 2017, 22(2): 462-467.
21	Watt DG, McSorley ST, Park JH, et al. A postoperative systemic inflammation score predicts short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(4): 1100-1109.
22	Ataseven B, du Bois A, Reinthaller A, et al. Pre-operative serum albumin is associated with post-operative complication rate and overall survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138(3): 560-565.
23	Sun SY, Chen PP, Meng LX, et al. High preoperative plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin score is associated with poor survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2019, 32(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy057.
24	Zhang J, Li SQ, Liao ZH, et al. Prognostic value of a novel FPR biomarker in patients with surgical stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastric cancer[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(43): 75195-75205.
25	Li SQ, Jiang YH, Lin J, et al. Albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio as a promising biomarker to predict clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer individuals[J]. Cancer Med, 2018, 7(4): 1221-1231.
26	Olsson AK, Cedervall J. The pro-inflammatory role of platelets in cancer[J]. Platelets, 2018, 29(6): 569-573.
27	Pedersen LM, Milman N. Prognostic significance of thrombocytosis in patients with primary lung cancer[J]. Eur Respir J, 1996, 9(9): 1826-1830.
28	Aoe K, Hiraki A, Ueoka H, et al. Thrombocytosis as a useful prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer[J]. Respiration, 2004, 71(2): 170-173.
29	Tomita M, Shimizu T, Ayabe T, et al. Prognostic significance of the combined use of preoperative platelet count and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 58(11): 573-576.
30	Fontaine E, McShane J, Page R, et al. Aspirin and non-small cell lung cancer resections: effect on long-term survival[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010, 38(1): 21-26.
31	Zhang Y, Unnithan RVM, Hamidi A, et al. TANK-binding kinase 1 is a mediator of platelet-induced EMT in mammary carcinoma cells[J]. FASEB J, 2019, 33(7): 7822-7832.
32	Wojtukiewicz MZ, Sierko E, Hempel D, et al. Platelets and cancer angiogenesis nexus[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2017, 36(2): 249-262.
33	Jiang L, Luan Y, Miao X, et al. Platelet releasate promotes breast cancer growth and angiogenesis via VEGF-integrin cooperative signalling[J]. Br J Cancer, 2017, 117(5): 695-703.
34	Jiang W, Huang Y, An Y, et al. Remodeling Tumor Vasculature to Enhance Delivery of Intermediate-Sized Nanoparticles[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(9): 8689-8696.
35	Viallard C, Larrivée B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization：alternative therapeutic targets[J]. Angiogenesis, 2017, 20(4): 409-426.
36	Deng TB, Zhang J, Zhou YZ, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in patients with lung cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(50): e13505.

[1]	谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[2]	李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[3]	王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[4]	狄海萍, 郑军杰, 刘磊, 郭海娜, 邢培朋, 曹大勇, 马超, 黄万新, 张博, 夏成德, 周超. 人工真皮联合富血小板纤维蛋白修复小面积深度创面的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 288-293.
[5]	赵芊, 李亚坤, 李智. 同种异体富血小板血浆临床应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 364-367.
[6]	刘松, 张进召, 贾艳云. 帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌反应降低与抗生素预处理的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 553-557.
[7]	赵海燕, 靳海涛, 孔莺, 何瑞远. 血浆NGS-ctDNA对EGFR-TKIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 385-391.
[8]	李静静, 许金花, 吴国峰, 任亚俊, 张骞云. 伏美替尼一线治疗EGFR突变晚期NSCLC脑转移的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 426-429.
[9]	董学峰, 常乐, 蔡振煜. 血清ESR、CRP及PLR、MLR联合诊断结缔组织相关性间质性肺炎的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 430-433.
[10]	王向丽, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 刘恒, 刘文慧, 周芮, 田红娟. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗ANKRD26相关性血小板减少症1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 236-238.
[11]	刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[12]	张龙, 孙善柯, 徐伟, 李文柱, 李俊达, 池涌泉, 何广胜, 成峰, 王学浩, 饶建华. 腹腔镜脾切除治疗血液系统疾病的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 870-875.
[13]	何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[14]	崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[15]	周雅萍, 洪月慧, 苏宁, 刘暴, 朱铁楠, 倪俊. 脑淀粉样血管病合并易栓状态的临床治疗决策[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 338-344.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Prognostic significance of platelet and albumin/fibrinogen ratio in second-line therapy of bevacizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Prognostic significance of platelet and albumin/fibrinogen ratio in second-line therapy of bevacizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer