切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 223 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.02.010

论著

成人肺炎支原体肺炎临床特征分析
李苑莹1, 龚金如1, 陈晓璇1, 孙瑞琳1,()   
  1. 1. 510310 广州,暨南大学附属广东省第二人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-05 出版日期:2024-04-25
  • 通信作者: 孙瑞琳
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(202102010078); 北京医卫健康公益基金会项目(B20078DS)

Analysis of clinical characterization of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults

Yuanying Li1, Jinru Gong1, Xiaoxuan Chen1, Ruilin Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510310, China
  • Received:2023-12-05 Published:2024-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Ruilin Sun
引用本文:

李苑莹, 龚金如, 陈晓璇, 孙瑞琳. 成人肺炎支原体肺炎临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 223-228.

Yuanying Li, Jinru Gong, Xiaoxuan Chen, Ruilin Sun. Analysis of clinical characterization of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(02): 223-228.

目的

分析成人肺炎支原体肺炎(Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, MPP)的临床特征。

方法

选择2023年4月1日至2023年11月30日我院收治的经靶向高通量测序(targeted next-generation sequencing, tNGS)病原学检测诊断MPP患者74例,PaO2≤80 mmHg 22例为观察组,PaO2≥80 mmHg 52例为对照组,分析患者的临床特征。

结果

74例中女48例(64.86%),好发年龄18~44岁55例(74.32%),主要临床症状咳嗽74例(100.00%),咳痰67例(90.54%),发热60例(81.08%)。无基础疾病者61例(82.43%),检出大环内酯类耐药基因57例(77.03%),MP单一感染68例(91.89%)。观察组较对照组最高体温>38 ℃[20例(90.91%)vs. 32例(61.54%)]、PaO2[ (72.42±11.12) vs. (92.93±11.07)]mmHg、MP均一化序列数[(3 7241.82±20 530.88) vs. (24 352.08±16 835.32)]差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),性别、年龄、入院前病程>7 d、临床症状、肺部啰音、pH、PaCO2、HCO3、抗生素暴露史、基础疾病史、住院天数、检出耐药基因及MP单一感染无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组白细胞[(8.06±1.91) vs. (6.63±1.82)] ×109/L、中性粒细胞[(5.86±1.85) vs. (4.41±1.58)] ×109/L、C-反应蛋白[(48.21±47.09) vs. (31.55±19.64)]mg/L差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);单核细胞、淋巴细胞差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组胸部CT病灶分布部位、病变形态、纵隔淋巴结肿大、胸腔积液差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

成人MPP女性多于男性,好发于无基础疾病的年轻人,临床表现不特异,主要症状为咳嗽、咳痰、发热。MPP大环内酯类耐药基因突变率高,少数为混合感染,出现中高程度发热、tNGS检出MP均一化序列数高、炎性标志物升高时有发生低氧血症甚至进展为重症倾向应以重视。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characterization of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) in adults.

Methods

The clinical data of 74 MPP patients diagnosed by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) pathogenetic testing in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed from April 1, 2023, to November 30, 2023, and divided into 22 cases of hypoxia( PaO2≤80 mmHg) in the observation group and 52 cases of non-hypoxia (PaO2≥80 mmHg) in the control group, to explore the clinical characteristics of adult MPP.

Results

Among the 74 patients with MPP, 48 cases(64.86%) were females, the prevalent age group was 18 to 44 years old in 55 cases(74.32%), and the main clinical symptoms were cough in 74 cases (100.00%), cough sputum in 67 cases (90.54%), and fever in 60 cases (81.08%). There were 61 cases (82.43%) without underlying disease, 57 cases (77.03%) with detection of macrolide resistance gene, and 68 cases (91.89%) with MP mono-infection. The differences in maximum body temperature >38 ℃[20 cases(90.91)vs. 32 cases(61.54)], PaO2[ (72.42±11.12) vs. (92.93±11.07)]mmHg and the number of MP homogenization sequences [(37 241.82±20 530.88) vs. (24 352.08±16 835.32)]between the observation group and the control group were statistically significant (P<0.05), and the differences in gender, age, duration of illness >7 days before admission, clinical symptoms, pulmonary rales, pH, PaCO2, HCO3-, history of antibiotic exposure, underlying disease history, days of hospitalization, detection of drug-resistant genes, and MP single infection were not statistically significant (P>0.05), and the differences in leukocytes[(8.06±1.91) vs. (6.63±1.82)] ×109/L, neutrophils[(5.86±1.85) vs. (4.41±1.58)]×109/L, and C-reactive protein [(48.21±47.09) vs. (31.55±19.64)]mg/L between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), while the differences in monocytes and lymphocytes were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution site of chest CT lesions, lesion morphology, mediastinal lymph node enlargement, and pleural effusion between the two groups of patients (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Adult MPP patients are more often female than male, and occur in young people without underlying diseases, with nonspecific clinical manifestations, mainly cough, sputum, and fever. MPP patients have a high rate of mutations in macrolide-resistant genes, and a few of them have co-infections, with a tendency to develop hypoxemia or even progress to severe disease when they have a moderately high degree of fever, a high number of MP homogenization sequences on tNGS, and an elevated number of inflammatory markers.

表1 两组患者临床特征比较[(±s),n(%)]
表2 两组患者实验室指标比较
表3 两组患者影像学特征比较
1
Waites KB, Xiao L, Liu Y, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2017, 30(3): 747-809.
2
Zhang XB, He W, Gui YH, et al. Current Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemic among children in Shanghai: unusual pneumonia caused by usual pathogen[J]. World J Pediatr, 2024, 20(1): 5-10.
3
Yan C, Xue GH, Zhao HQ, et al. Current status of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in China[J]. World J Pediatr, 2024, 20(1): 1-4.
4
Ling Y, Zhang T, Guo W, et al. Identify clinical factors related to Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with hypoxia in children[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2020, 20(1): 534.
5
Metsälä R, Ala-Korpi S, Rannikko J, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae may cause dyspnoea and hospitalisations in young healthy adults[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2021, 40(7): 1427-1431.
6
邹雨航,李梦瑶,张园园,等. 肺炎支原体感染检测的研究进展[J]. 中华儿科杂志2023, 61(3): 274-277.
7
陈雪梅,丁声龙,陈远洋,等. 宏基因组学新一代测序技术诊断尿放线杆菌肺炎一例[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(5): 765-767.
8
徐伟玲,于少飞. 病原靶向二代测序在下呼吸道感染病原体诊断中应用价值研究进展[J]. 检验医学与临床2023, 20(20): 3068-3072.
9
Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, ESGMAC the ESGMAC MAPS study group. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: gone forever?[J]. Lancet Microbe, 2023, 4(10): e763.
10
Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, Uldum SA, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae detections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a global survey, 2017 to 2021[J]. Euro Surveill, 2022, 27(19): 2100746.
11
Meyer Sauteur PM, Beeton ML, European society of clinical Microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) study group for Mycoplasma, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: delayed re-emergence after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions[J]. Lancet Microbe, 2024, 5(2): e100-e101.
12
Lv YT, Sun XJ, Chen Y, et al. Epidemic characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a retrospective analysis of a single center in Suzhou from 2014 to 2020[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(20): 1123-1123.
13
Wang X, Li M, Luo M, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae triggers pneumonia epidemic in autumn and winter in Beijing: a multicentre, population-based epidemiological study between 2015 and 2020[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2022, 11(1): 1508-1517.
14
Gong C, Zhang T, Luo M, et al. Distribution of the atypical pathogens of community-acquired pneumonia to disease severity[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(11): 5991-6001.
15
Ren Y, Wang Y, Liang R, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 21859.
16
Shangguan Z, Sun Q, Zhang M, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in hospitalized adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia in China[J]. J Infect Dev Ctries, 2014, 8(10): 1259-1266.
17
Nordholm AC, Søborg B, Jokelainen P, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemic in Denmark, October to December, 2023[J]. Euro Surveill, 2024, 29(2): 2300707.
18
Izumikawa K, Izumikawa K, Takazono T, et al. Clinical features, risk factors and treatment of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a review of the Japanese literature[J]. J Infect Chemother, 2014, 20(3): 181-185.
19
Li M, Wei X, Zhang SS, et al. Recognition of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia among Myocoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized children: development and validation of a predictive nomogram model[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2023, 23(1): 383.
20
Wang Y, Yu X, Liu F, et al. Respiratory microbiota imbalance in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2023, 12(1): 2202272.
21
赵 枫,史 亚,王 莹,等. PCR反应条件对16S rRNA基因扩增子测序准确性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报2022, 49(7): 2527-2537.
22
de Muinck EJ, Trosvik P, Gilfillan GD, et al. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform[J]. Microbiome, 2017, 5(1): 68.
23
赵顺英,钱素云,陈志敏,等. 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎诊疗指南(2023年版)[J]. 传染病信息2023, 36(4): 291-297.
24
Lee KL, Lee CM, Yang TL, et al. Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia requiring intensive care in children, 2010-2019[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2021, 120(1 Pt 1): 281-291.
25
Miyashita N, Obase Y, Ouchi K, et al. Clinical features of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults admitted to an intensive care unit[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2007, 56(Pt 12): 1625-1629.
26
Cao B, Qu JX, Yin YD, et al. Overview of antimicrobial options for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: focus on macrolide resistance[J]. Clin Respir J, 2017, 11(4): 419-429.
27
宋莉红,肖红丽,辛德莉,等. 成人肺炎支原体急性感染致社区获得性肺炎的临床特征:一项多中心横断面研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学2016, 28(6): 492-497.
28
Chen YC, Hsu WY, Chang TH. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2020, 26(7): 1382-1391.
29
Lin L, Zhang R, Zhang Z, et al. Clinical value of metagenomics next-generation sequencing in antibiotic resistance of a patient with severe refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: A case report[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2023, 16: 4593-4597.
30
陈志敏,求伟玲. 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎治疗进展[J] . 中华实用儿科临床杂志2021, 36(16): 1214-1217.
31
Tsai TA, Tsai CK, Kuo KC, et al. Rational stepwise approach for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2021, 54(4): 557-565.
32
Kim K, Jung S, Kim M, et al. Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant mycoplasma pneumoniae infections[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2022, 5(7): e2220949.
[1] 张焱, 刘春媚, 姚瑾, 陈苗苗, 徐雯, 黄品同. 超声O-RADS分类和临床特征对不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 268-274.
[2] 钱雅君, 虞竹溪, 徐颖, 董丹江, 顾勤. 危重型新型冠状病毒感染合并侵袭性肺曲霉病的临床特征和高危因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 3-9.
[3] 薛嘉怡, 王丽, 艾涛. 巨噬细胞在儿童肺炎支原体肺炎中作用机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 643-648.
[4] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[5] 杨梅, 周春, 赵艾红, 王琴. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎所致塑型性支气管炎风险列线图模型的构建[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 274-281.
[6] 高佳, 姜吉询, 王鑫, 吴婷, 向江明. 病理性乳头溢液单中心临床分析附168例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 323-326.
[7] 颜晓敏, 崔嵘嵘. 23例乳腺佩吉特病的经验交流[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 353-354.
[8] 拉周措毛, 山春玲, 李国蓉, 华毛. 青海西宁地区IPF-LC的病理类型及临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 25-29.
[9] 王婷, 余江. 1 820例罕见病的临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 68-72.
[10] 周恩竹, 刘敏, 万秋, 刘静文, 唐莉歆. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病与获得性免疫缺陷综合征共病的临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 78-82.
[11] 奚琼, 芮祖琴. ECMO在成人呼吸衰竭治疗及转运中的应用进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 899-902.
[12] 陈勇, 任建伟, 朱光发, 刘玉磊, 吴绍芹. 非移植患者侵袭性肺曲霉病32例临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 809-813.
[13] 朱丽臻, 范文萃, 李梦瑶, 李丽, 张月, 石艳红. 外周血NLRP3、IL-18和IL-1β在肺炎支原体肺炎患儿中的表达及检测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 860-863.
[14] 路长贵, 唐维兵. 新生儿及小婴儿先天性胆管扩张症临床特征分析及微创治疗[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 76-82.
[15] 余旭旭, 魏杰, 楼芳. 卵巢透明细胞癌诊疗现状及进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 91-95.
阅读次数
全文


摘要