切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 805 -812. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.05.013

论著

基于生物信息学结直肠癌肺转移关键基因筛选及功能与调控机制的研究
周昊1, 游雅婷2, 张硕辛2, 徐征国1,†()   
  1. 1400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院消化内科
    2400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院呼吸内科
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-03 出版日期:2026-10-25
  • 通信作者: 徐征国

Screening of key genes for lung metastasis in colorectal cancer based on bioinformatic methods and research on their functions and regulatory mechanisms

Hao Zhou1, Yating You2, Shuoxin Zhang2, Zhengguo Xu1,†()   

  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
    2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2026-07-03 Published:2026-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhengguo Xu
引用本文:

周昊, 游雅婷, 张硕辛, 徐征国. 基于生物信息学结直肠癌肺转移关键基因筛选及功能与调控机制的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(05): 805-812.

Hao Zhou, Yating You, Shuoxin Zhang, Zhengguo Xu. Screening of key genes for lung metastasis in colorectal cancer based on bioinformatic methods and research on their functions and regulatory mechanisms[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(05): 805-812.

目的

探讨结直肠癌肺转移相关关键基因及潜在分子机制,为结直肠癌肺转移早期诊断及靶向治疗提供参考。

方法

从基因表达综合数据库(gene expression omnibus, GEO)获取GSE41258数据集,对结直肠癌原发样本与肺转移样本进行差异表达分析,筛选差异表达基因(differentially expressed genes, DEGs)。采用基因本体(gene ontology, GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes,KEGG)富集分析探讨生物学功能,通过蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(protein-protein interaction, PPI)网络筛选候选基因。采用随机森林(random forest, RF)、逻辑回归(logistic regression, LR)和轻量级梯度提升机(light gradient boosting machine, LightGBM)算法联合夏普利加性解释(Shapley additive explanations, SHAP)分析筛选核心基因,结合人类蛋白质图谱(human protein atlas, HPA)数据库及基因集富集分析(gene set enrichment analysis, GSEA)进行验证和功能分析。

结果

共筛选获得196个结直肠癌肺转移相关DEGs。GO及KEGG富集分析显示,肺转移相关基因主要富集于细胞外基质(extracellular matrix, ECM)组织重塑、细胞黏附调控及能量代谢等与肿瘤转移密切相关的生物学过程和信号通路,提示可能在结直肠癌细胞向肺组织迁移、定植及转移微环境重塑过程中发挥作用。RF、LR及LightGBM模型在测试集中曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)分别为0.830、0.852和0.942,LightGBM模型预测性能最佳。结合SHAP特征重要性分析最终确定ATP柠檬酸裂解酶(ATP citrate lyase, ACLY)和聚集蛋白聚糖(aggrecan, ACAN)为结直肠癌肺转移相关核心基因。HPA数据库验证结果显示,ACLY和ACAN蛋白在结直肠癌组织中表达水平高于正常组织,在结直肠癌进展过程中发挥重要作用。GSEA结果显示,ACAN高表达组主要富集于ECM受体相互作用及整合素相关通路;ACLY高表达组主要富集于补体与凝血级联反应、核糖体生成及剪接体等相关通路,可通过调控肿瘤代谢重编程及细胞外基质重塑参与结直肠癌肺转移过程。

结论

基于GEO数据库转录组数据,通过差异表达分析、功能富集分析、PPI网络分析及机器学习筛选,识别出ACLY和ACAN两个与结直肠癌肺转移相关候选基因。ACLY与ACAN表达特征可能反映结直肠癌肺转移分子表型,有望发展为肺转移组织学诊断辅助标志物,或作为靶向干预候选分子。

Objective

To identify key genes associated with colorectal cancer lung metastasis and explore their potential molecular mechanisms, thereby providing references for the early diagnosis and targeted therapy of colorectal cancer lung metastasis.

Methods

The GSE41258 dataset was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differential expression analysis was performed between primary colorectal cancer samples and lung metastatic samples to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were conducted to investigate the biological functions of DEGs, and candidate genes were screened using a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network. Subsequently, Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithms combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis were employed to identify key genes. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were further used for validation and functional characterization.

Results

A total of 196 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with colorectal cancer lung metastasis were identified. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that these genes were mainly enriched in biological processes and signaling pathways related to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, cell adhesion regulation, and energy metabolism, suggesting their potential roles in colorectal cancer lung metastasis and metastatic microenvironment remodeling. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the RF, LR, and LightGBM models in the testing set were 0.830, 0.852, and 0.942, respectively, with LightGBM showing the best predictive performance. Integrated machine learning and SHAP analyses identified ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) and aggrecan (ACAN) as the key genes associated with colorectal cancer lung metastasis. Validation using the HPA database demonstrated that ACLY and ACAN proteins were expressed at higher levels in colorectal cancer tissues than in normal tissues, further supporting their potential roles in colorectal cancer progression. GSEA revealed that the ACAN high-expression group was mainly enriched in extracellular matrix (ECM) receptor interaction and integrin-related pathways, whereas the ACLY high-expression group was primarily enriched in complement and coagulation cascades, ribosome biogenesis, and spliceosome-related pathways, suggesting potential roles for these genes in colorectal cancer lung metastasis through the regulation of tumor metabolic reprogramming and extracellular matrix remodeling.

Conclusion

In summary, based on transcriptomic data from the GEO database, this study identified ACLY and ACAN as candidate genes associated with colorectal cancer lung metastasis through differential expression analysis, functional enrichment analysis, PPI network analysis, and machine learning screening. The expression features of ACLY and ACAN may reflect the molecular phenotype of colorectal cancer lung metastasis and may potentially serve as auxiliary markers for histological diagnosis of lung metastasis or as candidate molecules for targeted intervention.

图1 结直肠癌肺转移相关DEGs的功能富集分析及PPI网络。图A为KEGG通路富集分析结果;图B为GO功能富集分析结果;图C为DEGs的PPI网络。图A、B中横坐标(Count)表示富集基因数,纵坐标表示富集条目,颜色表示校正后P值(FDR),颜色越接近红色表示富集显著性越高。图C中每个节点代表一个基因,每条连线代表基因间相互作用关系;节点大小及颜色深浅与其degree相关,节点越大、颜色越深表示与其他基因的连接数量越多。根据网络拓扑学分析,共筛选获得20个候选Hub基因
图2 机器学习模型构建及关键基因筛选。图A为训练集中各机器学习模型AUC比较;图B为测试集中各机器学习模型AUC比较;图C为训练集中各模型ROC曲线;图D为测试集中各模型ROC曲线;图E为基于RF模型关键特征SHAP分析结果。图A、B中横坐标表示AUC值,纵坐标表示不同机器学习模型,条形长度表示对应模型AUC值。图C、D中横坐标(1-specificity)表示假阳性率,纵坐标(sensitivity)表示真阳性率,对角虚线表示随机分类参考线。E左图为各特征基因SHAP值分布,不同颜色表示特征值由低到高变化;E右图为各特征基因平均绝对SHAP值排序,条形长度表示该特征对模型预测结果的贡献程度,数值越大表示特征重要性越高
图3 关键基因蛋白表达补充分析及基因集富集分析。图A、B为ACAN在正常结肠组织(图A)和结直肠癌组织(图B)中免疫组化染色结果;图C、D为ACLY在正常结肠组织(图C)和结直肠癌组织(图D)中的免疫组化染色结果;图E为ACAN高表达组的GSEA结果;图F为ACLY高表达组的GSEA结果。图A、C为正常结肠组织,图B、D为结直肠癌组织。图A-D为免疫组化图片来源于HPA数据库,ACAN采用抗体HPA038241,ACLY采用抗体HPA022434。染色强度按0-3+四分法评估,0表示阴性,1+表示弱阳性,2+表示中等阳性,3+表示强阳性。图E、F中横坐标表示排序后基因集,纵坐标表示富集分数(enrichment score,ES);不同颜色曲线表示不同富集通路,曲线峰值反映对应通路的富集程度
1
Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, et al. Cancer statistics, 2025[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2025, 75(1): 10-45.
2
Cañellas-socias A, Sancho E, Batlle E. Mechanisms of metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 21(9): 609-625.
3
Rahbari NN, Carr PR, Jansen L, et al. Time of metastasis and outcome in colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(3): 494-502.
4
Liu JL, Xu X, Rixiati Y, et al. Dysfunctional circadian clock accelerates cancer metastasis by intestinal microbiota triggering accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells[J]. Cell Metab, 2024, 36(6): 1320-34.e9.
5
Shin AE, Giancotti FG, Rustgi AK. Metastatic colorectal cancer: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 44(4): 222-236.
6
Castaneda M, Den Hollander P, Kuburich NA, et al. Mechanisms of cancer metastasis[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2022, 87: 17-31.
7
Gupta GP, Massagué J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework[J]. Cell, 2006, 127(4): 679-695.
8
Yuan Z, Li Y, Zhang S, et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling in tumor progression and immune escape: from mechanisms to treatments[J]. Mol Cancer, 2023, 22(1): 48.
9
Smart JA, Oleksak JE, Hartsough EJ. Cell adhesion molecules in plasticity and metastasis[J]. Mol Cancer Res, 2021, 19(1): 25-37.
10
Terry S, Engelsen AST, Buart S, et al. Hypoxia-driven intratumor heterogeneity and immune evasion[J]. Cancer Lett, 2020, 492: 1-10.
11
Tang J, Chen Z, Zhang D, et al. ENO2 drives tumor cell-induced M2 macrophage polarization to promote colorectal cancer liver metastasis[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2026, 11(1): 166.
12
俞颖倩,徐兴祥. 淋巴结转移与非转移对原发性支气管肺癌免疫微环境及免疫治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(6): 1027-1030.
13
Wolde T, Bhardwaj V, Pandey V. Current bioinformatics tools in precision oncology[J]. Med Comm (2020), 2025, 6(7): e70243.
14
Jia Q, Chu H, Jin Z, et al. High-throughput single-cell sequencing in cancer research[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2022, 7(1): 145.
15
汪艳,孙美玲,闵凌峰. 基于TCGA数据库肺腺癌铁死亡相关基因CA9的鉴定[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(6): 888-894.
16
Prakash J, Shaked Y. The interplay between extracellular matrix remodeling and cancer therapeutics [J]. Cancer Discov, 2024, 14(8): 1375-1388.
17
Winkler J, Abisoye-ogunniyan A, Metcalf KJ, et al. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 5120.
18
Semenza GL. HIF-1 and tumor progression: pathophysiology and therapeutics[J]. Trends Mol Med, 2002, 8(4 Suppl): S62-S67.
19
Seo J, Yun JE, Kim SJ, et al. Lipid metabolic reprogramming by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in the hypoxic tumour microenvironment [J]. Pflugers Arch, 2022, 474(6): 591-601.
20
Zaidi N, Swinnen JV, Smans K. ATP-citrate lyase: a key player in cancer metabolism [J]. Cancer Res, 2012, 72(15): 3709-3714.
21
Lee JV, Carrer A, Shah S, et al. Akt-dependent metabolic reprogramming regulates tumor cell histone acetylation[J]. Cell Metab, 2014, 20(2): 306-319.
22
Gautam J, Wu J, Lally JSV, et al. ACLY inhibition promotes tumour immunity and suppresses liver cancer[J]. Nature, 2025, 645(8080): 507-517.
23
Correction: acetyl-CoA metabolism supports multistep pancreatic tumorigenesis[J]. Cancer Discov, 2024, 14(9): 1757.
24
Li W, Lin M, ZHAO Y, et al. Cholesterol synthases suppress metastasis and stemness through PDIA4/ACLY or SYVN1/SCD1 axis in advanced colorectal cancer[J]. Commun Biol, 2026, 9(1): 795.
25
Lin R, Tao R, Gao X, et al. Acetylation stabilizes ATP-citrate lyase to promote lipid biosynthesis and tumor growth[J]. Mol Cell, 2013, 51(4): 506-518.
26
Wellen KE, Hatzivassiliou G, Sachdeva UM, et al. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1076-1080.
27
Xiang W, Lv H, Xing F, et al. Inhibition of ACLY overcomes cancer immunotherapy resistance via polyunsaturated fatty acids peroxidation and cGAS-STING activation[J]. Sci Adv, 2023, 9(49): eadi2465.
28
Inoue C, Miki Y, Fukuda T, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast marker signatures and stromal composition in usual interstitial pneumonia-associated lung adenocarcinoma: an analysis using a proteomic-immunohistochemical approach[J]. Virchows Arch, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04254-8.
29
Tong X, Poramba-liyanage DW, Van Hoolwerff M, et al. Isolation and tracing of matrix-producing notochordal and chondrocyte cells using ACAN-2A-mScarlet reporter human iPSC lines[J]. Sci Adv, 2024, 10(43): eadp3170.
30
Barahona RA, Kwang NE, Kono-soosaipillai AR, et al. Aggrecan protects against plaque accumulation and is essential for proper microglial responses to plaques[J]. Cell Rep, 2025, 44(8): 116064.
31
Wu Y, Yang S, Ma J, et al. Spatiotemporal immune landscape of colorectal cancer liver metastasis at single-cell level[J]. Cancer Discov, 2022, 12(1): 134-153.
[1] 何静, 龙义添, 曲海波, 罗蓉. MRI在注意缺陷多动障碍儿童中应用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 380-390.
[2] 李东, 董烈峰, 赵文月, 宋振晴. 联合临床特征与血清学指标的机器学习模型预测急性胰腺炎持续性器官衰竭[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(06): 576-581.
[3] 南岩东, 李玉娟, 刘苗苗, 任腾. 基于生物信息学探讨分层蛋白在肺腺癌的表达特征及预后价值[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(05): 779-785.
[4] 龙铭, 贺斌峰, 李德峰, 高瞻, 秦蘅, 王关嵩. ADAM33基因多态性介导哮喘气道重塑及对免疫治疗效果影响的生物信息学研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(05): 786-796.
[5] 谢尔盖·叶菲托夫, 曹馨仁, 曹宇, 刘正, 波琳娜·帕诺娃. 腹膜后入路联合经自然腔道取出标本的乙状结肠癌根治术(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 477-480.
[6] 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会NOSES技术推广专家委员会, 海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会肿瘤学分会日间手术学组. 结直肠癌日间手术专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 385-394.
[7] 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 结直肠癌手术肠管切割吻合及重建的吻合器应用规范与专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 395-402.
[8] 韩慕华, 姜慧员, 刘海义. 结直肠癌经阴道取标本NOSES手术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 442-447.
[9] 陆昕恬, 吴其标, 徐艺. 中药复方及单体通过相关信号通路抗结直肠癌侵袭转移的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 448-453.
[10] 齐劲杨, 牛河源, 李晓萍, 范星灿, 刘子俊, 刘刚. 加压腹腔气溶胶化疗联合治疗策略在结直肠癌腹膜转移中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 454-459.
[11] 金磊, 印小毛, 李新星, 胡志前. 大肠黏液腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 299-306.
[12] 张若昕, 陆瑶, 刘益磊, 陈国良, 张剑. 盆腔脏器联合切除术中的ERAS与PROMs:从医生视角到患者视角的转变[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 307-314.
[13] 徐正, 杨明, 张岳阳, 周海涛, 关旭, 王锡山. 2024年与2022年中国结直肠癌发病和死亡估计值的描述性比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 315-320.
[14] 高韶华, 徐涛, 宋亮, 雷丽, 王洪伟, 刘宏新. 1994—2023年中国结直肠癌疾病年龄-时期-队列效应及危险因素归因分析——基于GBD 2023研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 321-330.
[15] 林佳仪, 黄颖. Treg细胞在结直肠癌中的作用机制及靶向治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 356-360.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?