切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 834 -839. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.05.017

论著

术前机器人辅助CT引导下钩丝定位肺结节的应用研究
孙槁烽, 叶张鹏, 马春辉, 陈志坚, 张福全†()   
  1. 226000 南通,南通市第一人民医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-02 出版日期:2026-10-25
  • 通信作者: 张福全
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫健委2025年度医学科研立项项目(M2025034); 南通市自然科学基金项目(JC2025079)

Application study of robotassisted CTguided Hookwire localization for pulmonary nodules before surgery

Gaofeng Sun, Zhangpeng Ye, Chunhui Ma, Zhijian Chen, Fuquan Zhang†()   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nantong First People′s Hospital, Nantong 226000, China
  • Received:2026-06-02 Published:2026-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Fuquan Zhang
引用本文:

孙槁烽, 叶张鹏, 马春辉, 陈志坚, 张福全. 术前机器人辅助CT引导下钩丝定位肺结节的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(05): 834-839.

Gaofeng Sun, Zhangpeng Ye, Chunhui Ma, Zhijian Chen, Fuquan Zhang. Application study of robotassisted CTguided Hookwire localization for pulmonary nodules before surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(05): 834-839.

目的

探讨机器人辅助CT引导钩丝(Hook-wire)定位在肺部磨玻璃结节(groundglass nodules, GGN)电视辅助胸腔镜手术(videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS)前的安全性与准确性,构建决策树(decision tree algorithm, DTA)预测模型。

方法

选择2022年1月至2025年4月我院收治的经机器人辅助CT引导钩丝定位VATS手术GGN患者378例,定位成功345例为对照组,定位未成功33例为观察组。比较两组临床资料、定位准确率及穿刺相关并发症;构建DTA预测模型,采用受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线、校准曲线及5折交叉验证判断预测效能。

结果

定位未成功33例(8.73%),其中钩丝脱出肺组织并异位至胸膜腔9例,钩丝移位24例。定位相关并发症气胸27例(7.14%),自限性肺出血46例(12.17%);轻微胸膜反应2例;无血胸、空气栓塞等危重并发症。观察组肺出血高于对照组10例(30.30%)比36例(10.43%)(P=0.001)。单因素分析显示,结节大小、结节到胸膜距离、总深度、吸烟史及病灶位置与定位不良相关(P<0.05)。DTA模型中特征权重结节到胸膜距离0.454、总深度0.245、肺结节大小0.217、吸烟史0.076和病灶位置0.007。ROC分析训练集曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)为0.909(95%CI:0.716~0.996),验证集AUC为0.950(95%CI:0.901~1.000);5折交叉验证后模型准确率为83.2%。校准曲线显示预测概率与实际发生率一致性良好。术后随访,肿瘤复发/转移45例,死亡19例。

结论

机器人辅助CT引导钩丝定位用于GGN术前定位安全可靠;结节到胸膜距离、结节大小、总深度、吸烟史及病灶部位是定位失败的影响因素;DTA模型可预测术前定位失败风险。

Objective

To investigate the safety and accuracy of robotassisted CTguided hookwire localization before videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary groundglass nodules (GGNs), and to construct a decision tree algorithm (DTA) prediction model.

Methods

A total of 378 patients with GGNs who underwent robotassisted CTguided hookwire localization followed by VATS in our hospital from January 2022 to April 2025 were enrolled. Among them, 345 cases with successful localization were assigned as the control group, and 33 cases with unsuccessful localization as the observation group. The clinical data, localization accuracy, and puncturerelated complications were compared between the two groups. A DTA prediction model was constructed, and its predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and 5fold crossvalidation.

Results

Localization failed in 33 cases (8.73%), including 9 cases of hookwire dislodgement from lung tissue with ectopic placement into the pleural cavity and 24 cases of hookwire displacement. Localizationrelated complications included pneumothorax in 27 cases (7.14%), selflimiting pulmonary hemorrhage in 46 cases (12.17%), and mild pleural reactions in 2 cases. No critical complications such as hemothorax or air embolism occurred. The incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [10 cases (30.30%) vs. 36 cases (10.43%), P=0.001]. Univariate analysis showed that nodule size, distance from nodule to pleura, total depth, smoking history, and lesion location were associated with poor localization (P<0.05). In the DTA model, the feature weights were: distance from nodule to pleura 0.454, total depth 0.245, nodule size 0.217, smoking history 0.076, and lesion location 0.007. The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.909 (95%CI: 0.716~0.996) for the training set and 0.950 (95%CI: 0.901~1.000) for the validation set. After 5fold crossvalidation, the model accuracy was 83.2%. The calibration curve showed good consistency between the predicted probability and the actual incidence. During postoperative followup, tumor recurrence/metastasis occurred in 45 cases, and 19 patients died.

Conclusion

Robotassisted CTguided hookwire localization is safe and reliable for preoperative localization of GGNs. Distance from nodule to pleura, nodule size, total depth, smoking history, and lesion location are influencing factors for localization failure. The DTA model can effectively predict the risk of preoperative localization failure.

表1 两组GGN患者临床资料结果比较
图1 65岁女性左上肺结节患者胸部CT图。图A为术前CT图示左上肺叶一枚类圆形磨玻璃结节,结节边界相对清楚,密度较淡,呈典型磨玻璃样改变,周围肺组织未见明显浸润征象,无胸膜牵拉或凹陷征;图B为术中CT定位示CT引导下钩线定位,金属钩线(白色高密度影)已成功置入,钩线尖端准确定位于目标结节附近,距结节中心约5 mm以内,定位精确。钩线走行路径经胸壁进入胸腔,穿过部分肺组织后到达目标区域。穿刺路径周围未见明显血肿形成,钩线位置稳定S
表2 两组GGN患者胸部影像学结果
图2 机器人辅助CT引导下定位风险的DAT模型决策曲线
1
Luo W, Ren Y, Liu Y, et al. Imaging diagnostics of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a narrative review with current status and future directions[J]. Quantitat Imag Med Surg, 2024, 14(8): 6123.
2
Wu H, Zhang X, Zhong Z. Exploration of CT-based discrimination and diagnosis of various pathological types of ground glass nodules in the lungs[J]. BMC Med Imag, 2025, 25(1): 119.
3
司菊花,金晓凤,刘龙群,等. CT纹理特征对肺磨玻璃结节性质的预测[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(2): 246-250.
4
Omindo WW. Management of screening-detected ground glass nodules:a narrative review[J]. Indian J Thorac Cardiovascul Surg, 2024, 40(2): 205-212.
5
李伍好,张田田,吴森林,等. CT导引带钩金属丝在肺磨玻璃结节术前定位中的临床应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2025, 35(4): 47-50,59.
6
Kim YT. Management of ground-glass nodules: when and how to operate?[J]. Cancers, 2022, 14(3): 715.
7
Voulaz E, Giudici VM, Lanza E, et al. Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided localization with indocyanine green for the thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(19): 6149.
8
Guo H, Ouyang Z, Li X, et al. Robotic-assisted CT-guided percutaneous pulmonary nodules localization by hook-wire needles: a retrospective observational study[J]. J ThoracDis, 2024, 16(7): 4263-4274.
9
陈佳龙,周蕾,秦玲玲,等. 肺结节术前定位的研究进展[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2025, 28(5): 385-390.
10
Wang Y, Jing L, Liang C, et al. Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of the four-hook needle and hook wire for the preoperative positioning of localization ground glass nodules[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2024, 19(1): 35.
11
Ala M, Liu J, Kou J, et al. The risk factors for the failure of hook wire localization of ground glass nodules prior to thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022,17(1): 114.
12
邹兴雄,夏俊杰,李宏伟,等. 胸腔镜术前CT导引下不同路径钩丝定位≤10 mm肺磨玻璃结节比较研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2024, 33(8): 884-890.
13
Pan C, Deng W, Zhao Y, et al. Precise localization techniques for small pulmonary nodules: what is next?[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2025, 17(9): 7366.
14
Deng C, Jiang Y, Lin Y, et al. The effectiveness of robotic-assisted navigation system for preoperative lung nodule localization: a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority, randomized clinical study[J]. Int J Surg, 2026, 112(3): 7039-7050.
15
Yin C, Chen Y, Zhang R, et al. Analysis of complication risk factors in preoperative computed tomography-guided hookwire location of pulmonary nodules[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2024, 29(1): 369.
16
牛力,曹海伦,张军,等. CT引导下Hook-wire在≤2 cm肺结节定位中的应用研究[J]. 实用放射学杂志,2023, 39(5): 817-820.
17
Xu Z, Ni Y, Gu B, et al. A retrospective study on pre-operative CT-guided hook-wire localization of pulmonary nodules[J]. Int J Radiat Res, 2023, 21(3): 377-382.
18
Liu J, Jiang Y, He R, et al. Robotic-assisted navigation system for preoperative lung nodule localization: a pilot study[J]. Translat Lung Cancer Res, 2023, 12(11): 2283.
19
Wang R, Chen Y, Wang C, et al. A better option for localization of multiple pulmonary nodules in the ipsilateral lung: electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy-guided preoperative localization[J]. Translat Lung Cancer Res, 2025, 14(3): 775.
20
Feng Q, Zhou J, Dong N, et al. Factors influencing the accuracy and safety of preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided soft hook-wire localization for pulmonary nodules: a comprehensive analysis[J]. Quant Imag Med Surg, 2024, 14(3): 2309-2320.
21
Wang C, Chen C, Liu G, et al. Retrospective study on preoperative hook wire localisation of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: risk factors for complications and preventive strategies[J]. Quant Imag Med Surg, 2025, 15(4): 3430-3444.
22
Wu WB, Wu YH, Zhang K, et al. A novel localization technique for margin distance assessment of deep-seated small pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic wedge resection: a retrospective study[J]. Quantitat Imag Med Surg, 2025, 15(4): 2802.
23
Wang X, Shi J, Liu Z. Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of subcentimeter lung cancer in the era of precision medicine[J]. Molecul Clin Oncol, 2024, 20(4): 28.
24
Wang Y, Chen E. Advances in the localization of pulmonary nodules:a comprehensive review[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2024, 19(1): 396.
25
Mazzone PJ, Lam L. Evaluating the patient with a pulmonary nodule:a review[J]. Jama, 2022, 327(3): 264-273.
26
Annareddy S, Ghewade B, Jadhav U, et al. Unveiling the long-term lung consequences of smoking and tobacco consumption: a narrative review[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(8): e66415.
27
Wang L, Sun D, Gao M, et al. Computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary nodules prior to thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2023, 14(2): 119-126.
28
Wang N, Xie K, Ma H, et al. Comparing four-hook and double-hook localization needles in preoperative pulmonary nodule positioning: efficacy, safety, and patient perception[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2024, 22(1): 320.
29
He R, Ming C, Lei Y, et al. Preoperative pulmonary nodule localization:A comparison of hook wire and Lung-pro-guided surgical markers[J]. Clin Respirat J, 2024, 18(1): e13726.
[1] 朱欣欣, 张懿, 杨亚荣, 袁娟, 王增国. 0~2个月龄百日咳婴儿的临床特征及进展为重症百日咳的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 410-417.
[2] 傅家祺, 蒋荣猛. 重症监护病房成人流感肺炎患者继发肺部细菌感染的病原菌分布与影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 221-230.
[3] 刘可文, 向鹏程, 周雯, 韩俊毅. 肠造口出口梗阻的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 319-324.
[4] 王吉伟, 许治坤, 谢志远, 龚龙波. 胃上部癌与胃下部癌淋巴结转移特征差异及预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 427-431.
[5] 王中尧, 李敬东. 肝细胞癌术后早期复发危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 495-500.
[6] 张彬, 王敏, 郑鹏, 冯犁, 李鑫, 赵高平. 早期胃癌淋巴结转移的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 337-342.
[7] 杨敏, 杜峻峰, 辛林璞. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 352-355.
[8] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[9] 谢吉艳, 江志鹏, 何立锐. 复发性腹壁疝的危险因素及治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 471-476.
[10] 王平, 郝天骄, 陈兴宇, 翟俊, 朱文伟, 陈季松. 急性坏疽性胆囊炎临床风险预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 760-767.
[11] 郭洋洁, 杨培, 曾新桃, 史瑞籽, 唐易平. 肝内胆管结石肝切除术后胆漏的危险因素分析及预测模型建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 783-790.
[12] 方荣焕, 孟子凡, 李馥彤, 鹿云皓, 杨永生. 肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除术后并发症研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 642-647.
[13] 高韶华, 徐涛, 宋亮, 雷丽, 王洪伟, 刘宏新. 1994—2023年中国结直肠癌疾病年龄-时期-队列效应及危险因素归因分析——基于GBD 2023研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 321-330.
[14] 张莞岚, 张丽芳, 黄巧懿, 黄微微, 陈科毅, 江兴. 帕金森患者吞咽障碍的特点及影响因素[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 220-225.
[15] 左桂超, 刘亚群, 徐秋霜, 李沐阳. 阿加曲班序贯疗法治疗进展性穿支动脉病变型脑梗死的临床疗效及其影响预后的相关因素[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 542-548.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?