切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 406 -409. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.04.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS对周围型肺癌诊断效能及影响因素分析
房延凤1, 李王平1, 顾兴1, 潘蕾1, 张红军1,(), 金发光1   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,第四军医大学唐都医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-23 出版日期:2017-08-20
  • 通信作者: 张红军
  • 基金资助:
    国家公益性行业科研专项(201402024); 第四军医大学唐都医院面上项目(2015LCYJ005)

Analysis of diagnostic efficacy and influencing factors of ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with EBUS-GS in peripheral lung carcinoma

Yanfeng Fang1, Wangping Li1, Xing Gu1, Lei Pan1, Hongjun Zhang1,(), Faguang Jin1   

  1. 1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, TangDu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi′an 710038, China
  • Received:2017-01-23 Published:2017-08-20
  • Corresponding author: Hongjun Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hongjun, Email:
引用本文:

房延凤, 李王平, 顾兴, 潘蕾, 张红军, 金发光. 超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS对周围型肺癌诊断效能及影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(04): 406-409.

Yanfeng Fang, Wangping Li, Xing Gu, Lei Pan, Hongjun Zhang, Faguang Jin. Analysis of diagnostic efficacy and influencing factors of ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with EBUS-GS in peripheral lung carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(04): 406-409.

目的

探讨超细支气管镜联合带引导鞘的支气管内超声(EBUS-GS)对周围型肺癌的诊断价值。

方法

纳入2015年8月至2016年6月就诊唐都医院呼吸科的高度疑似周围型肺癌患者208例(0.8 cm<直径<4 cm),超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS活检,进行良恶性病变诊断率的比较,不同影响因素下诊断率的比较及诊断效能的评价。

结果

208例患者中确诊肺癌180例,EBUS-GS对肺周围型恶性病变诊断率高于良性病变,有统计学差异(χ2=3.884,P=0.049);病变距肺门距离≤4 cm、≤5 cm和≤6 cm的诊断率分别为88.158%、74.545%、55.102%,三组间卡方检验(χ2=17.371,P=0.000),有统计学差异;有支气管充气征组与无支气管充气征组诊断率分别为84.906%、70.866%,两组间卡方检验(χ2=3.931,P=0.047),有统计学差异;超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS对周围型肺癌诊断敏感性75.000%,特异性92.857%,约登指数0.679。

结论

超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS对周围型肺癌的诊断效能高,安全可靠。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscopy and intrabronchial ultrasonography(EBUS-GS)combined with guide sheath in peripheral lung carcinoma.

Methods

208 cases of suspected peripheral lung cancer(0.8 cm<diameter<4 cm)were treated with ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with EBUS-GS biopsy from August 2015 to June 2016. The diagnostic rate of benign and malignant lesions were Comparison of different diagnostic factors and the diagnostic efficiency of the evaluation.

Results

One hundred and eighty cases of malignant tumors were diagnosed in 208 cases. The diagnostic rates of EBUS-GS in the pulmonary malignant lesions were higher than that in the benign lesions. There were significant differences(χ2=3.884, P=0.049). The diagnostic rates of the lesions from the hilum distance≤4 cm, ≤5 cm and≤6 cm were 88.158%, 74.545% and 55.102% respectively, there were significant differences(χ2=17.371, P=0.000). The diagnostic rates of bronchial aerated group and non-bronchial aerated group were 84.906%, 70.866% respectively, there were significant differences(χ2=3.93, P=0.047). The sensitivity of ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with EBUS-GS in the diagnosis of peripheral lung carcinoma was 75.000%, specificity was 92.857% and the index was 0.679.

Conclusions

Ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with EBUS-GS is a safe and reliable method for diagnosis of peripheral lung carcinoma.

表1 208例病理结果及构成比的比较
表2 超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS在肺部良恶性病变中诊断率的比较
表3 超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS在不同影响因素下诊断率的比较
1
Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening[J]. Engl Med, 2011, 365(2279): 395- 409.
2
River MP, Mehta AC. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rded American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practic Guidelines[J]. Chest, 2013, 143(5 Suppl): e142S-e165S.
3
Spiro SG, Gould MK, Colice GL, et al. Initial evaluation of the patient with lungcancer: symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and paraneoplastic syndr-omes: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines(2nd edition)[J]. Chest, 2007, 132(1 Suppl): 149S-160S.
4
方萍,靳庆芝,李维,等. 经超声支气管镜引导针吸活检术在肺部以及纵膈疾病诊断中的价值及应用[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(6): 689-693.
5
金发光. 虚拟支气管镜导航系统在肺内小结节诊治中的应用评价[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(2): 119-123.
6
潘蕾,薄丽艳,李王平,等. 虚拟支气管镜导航联合经支气管超声导向鞘引导技术与常规支气管镜诊断周围型肺癌的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(2): 124-129.
7
Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, et al. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Respir J, 2011, 37(4): 902-910.
8
Matsuno Y, Asano F, Shindoh J, et al. CT-guided ultrathin bronchoscopy bioptic approach and factors in predicting diagnosis[J]. Intern Med, 2011, 50(19): 2143-2148.
9
黄禹,陈正贤,任红岩,等. 支气管内超声两种回声特征在判断肺部周围型病灶良恶性中的应用[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2012, 32(7): 1016-1019.
10
李明,彭爱梅,张国良,等. 支气管超声下经引导鞘肺活检术诊断肺周围性病变的价值[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014, 37(1): 36-40.
11
Tay JH, Irving L, Antippa P, et al. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound: factors influencing visualization yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Respirology, 2013, 18(1): 185-190.
12
Guvenc C, Yserbyt J, Testelmans D, et al. Computed tomography characteristics predictive for radial EBUS miniprobe guided diagnosis of pulmonary lesions[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2015, 10(3): 472-478.
13
李静,陈正贤. 周围型肺癌支气管内超声支气管充气征及其病理学基础[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2010, 13(5): 424-431.
14
Czamecka K, Yasufuku K. Interventional pulmonology: Focus on pulmonary diagnostics[J]. Respirology, 2013, 18(1): 47-60.
15
Asano F, Aoe M, Ohsaki Y, et al. Complications associated with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration:A nation-wide survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy[J]. Respir Res, 2013, 14(1): 50.
16
Steinfort DP, Vincent J, Heinze S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound versus CT-guided needle biopsy for evaluation of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomized pragmatic trial[J]. Respir Med, 2011, 105(11): 1704-1711.
17
Hayama M, Izumo T, Matsumoto Y, et al. Complications w ith endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Respiration, 2015, 90(2): 129-135.
18
Haas AR, Vachani A, Sterman DH. Advances in diagnostic bronchoscopy[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2010, 182(5): 589-597.
[1] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[2] 夏婷君, 段耀祥, 段霞, 刘金凤. 助产士共情疲劳现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 302-311.
[3] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[4] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[5] 兰华, 高丽莎, 申明, 张铭光. 内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡出血的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 467-469.
[6] 陈文进, 张月君, 王传泰. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后肠梗阻发生的影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 389-392.
[7] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[8] 赵静, 范晔, 游雅婷, 陈慧, 王静, 张静. 虚拟支气管镜导航联合径向超声支气管镜在周围型肺癌中的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 524-528.
[9] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[10] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[11] 赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
[12] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要