切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 713 -716. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2019.06.009

论著

心源性肺淤血肺水肿的影像特征分析
杨柳1, 龚明福1,(), 戴书华1   
  1. 1. 400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-17 出版日期:2019-12-20
  • 通信作者: 龚明福
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目(chtc2015jcyjA10083); 重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(chtc2018jcyjAx0321)

Imaging features of cardiogenic pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema

Liu Yang1, Mingfu Gong1,(), Shuhua Dai1   

  1. 1. Radiology Department, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2019-05-17 Published:2019-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Mingfu Gong
引用本文:

杨柳, 龚明福, 戴书华. 心源性肺淤血肺水肿的影像特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(06): 713-716.

Liu Yang, Mingfu Gong, Shuhua Dai. Imaging features of cardiogenic pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(06): 713-716.

目的

探讨心源性肺淤血肺水肿的影像特征,为临床诊断提供更多可靠依据。

方法

以我院收治的100例心源性肺淤血肺水肿患者为研究对象,采用回顾法对相关资料展开分析,探讨其影像特征。

结果

通过影像分析发现,其中心脏增大96例(96.0%)、肺血转流40例(40.0%)。肺淤血改变44例(44.0%)。间质性肺水肿53例(53.0%),包括了支气管袖口22例(22.0%)和Kelery B、A、C线31例(31.0%),表现为肺纹理和肺门血管增粗、模糊,肺部小叶间隔线、胸膜下线的出现,支气管血管束增粗增多,支气管袖口征及小叶间隔呈光滑型增厚。肺泡性水肿40例(40.0%),表现为密度逐渐增高的薄纱样、云雾状以及云白样片状渗出影,典型表现为以肺门为中心的蝶翼样片状密度增高影,其中磨玻璃影或/和气腔实变以及边缘模糊19例(19.0%),蝶翼征21例(21.0%)。出现胸腔积液75例(75.0%)。

结论

心源性肺淤血和肺水肿改变在影像中早于临床,具有发展迅速和变化复杂的特点,通过对肺水肿胸部影像进行分析,能为医师的临床诊断提供更多可靠依据,有助于提升临床治疗效果。

Objective

To analyze the imaging features of cardiogenic pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema for more reliable clinical diagnosis.

Methods

One hundred patients with cardiogenic pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this study and their imaging features were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

From the images, cardiac enlargement was found in 96 cases (96.0%), pulmonary blood bypass in 40 cases (40.0%), pulmonary congestion in 44 cases (44.0%), and interstitial pulmonary edema in 53 cases (53.0%), including bronchial sleeve sign in 22 cases (22.0%) and Kelery B, A, and C line in 31 cases (31.0%), which were shown as thickening and blurring of the pulmonary texture and the portopulmonary blood vessels, occurrence of pulmonary interlobular septum line and subpleura line, thickening and increasing of bronchial vascular bundles, occurrence of bronchial sleeve sign, and thickening of the interlobular septum in a smooth type. Alveolar edema occurred in 40 cases (40.0%), showing as gradually increasing density of thin gauzes and cloud-like or cloud-white flake exudation. The typical manifestation was increased pterygoid density centering on the hilar of the lungs. Among them, 19 cases (19.0%) had ground glass shadow/cavity consolidation and blurring edge and 21 cases (21.0%) had butterfly wing sign. Pleural effusions occurred in 75 cases (75.0%).

Conclusion

The imaging changes of pulmonary congestion and pulmonary edema are earlier than the clinical changes, which are rapidly developed and complexly changed. Through analyzing the chest edema images, more reliable bases can be found for the doctor′s clinical diagnosis and for improving the clinical treatment outcome.

图4~6 同一患者,胸部X线(图4)及胸部CT(图5~6)见肺泡性肺水肿,双肺中内带对称性分布的磨玻璃影,网状小叶间隔增厚,肺门区密度增高,呈"蝶翼征"
1
Simon BA. Non-invasive imaging of regional lung function using x-ray computed tomography[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2000, 16(5-6): 433-442.
2
冯守瑞,任建英,郭喜云,等. 心源性肺淤血肺水肿的影像诊断分析[J]. 基层医学论坛,2017, 21(8): 960-962.
3
Cleland JG, Yassin AS, Khadjooi K. Acute heart failure: focusing on acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema[J]. Clin Med, 2010, 10(1): 59-64.
4
Bhattacharya M, Kallet RH, Ware LB, et al. Negative-pressure pulmonary edema [J]. Chest, 2016, 150(4): 927-33.
5
赵永峰,王新颜. 肺水肿的影像学与病理生理分析[J]. 职业与健康,2001, (6): 89-90.
6
楚克付. 心源性肺水肿的CT诊断[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2012, 20(6): 1068-1069.
7
Glaus T, Schellenberg S, Lang J. Cardiogenic and non cardiogenic pulmonary edema: pathomechanisms and causes[J]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd, 2010, 152(7): 311-317.
8
藩纪戌,张国帧,蔡祖龙. 胸部CT鉴别诊断学[M]. 北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004: 220-223.
9
Melenovsky V, Andersen MJ, Andress K, et al. Lung congestion in chronic heart failure: haemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic implications[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2015, 17(11): 1161-1171.
10
Milzman D, Napoli A, Hogan C, et al. Thoracic impedance vs chest radiograph to diagnose acute pulmonary edema in the ED[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2009, 27(7): 770-775.
11
黄依莲. 肺水肿的影像学鉴别诊断[J]. 亚太传统医药,2010, 5(6): 117-119.
12
Sed J, Zicha J, Kunes J, et al. Mechanisms of neurogenic pulmonary edema development[J]. Physiol Res, 2008, 57(4): 499-506.
13
纪树国,王 东. 对肺水肿的再认识[J]. 空军总医院学报,2005, 21 (1): 46-48.
14
陆大山,尤正芳. 肺水肿108例的影像学诊断与鉴别诊断分析[J]. 现代医药卫生,2009, 25(5): 742-743.
15
Takeuchi H, Suzuki S, Machida H, et al. Preliminary Results: Can dual energy computed tomography help distinguish cardiogenic pulmonary edema and acute interstitial lung disease?[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2018, 42(1): 39-44.?
16
王增状,姜 领,鞠衍松,等. 心源性肺水肿的CT征象分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2014, 12(6): 36-39.
17
王增状,姜 领,鞠衍松,等. 心源性肺水肿的X线与CT对比研究[J]. 中国实用医刊,2014, 41(5): 59-61.
18
郝爱华,曾庆娟,江 洁. 心源性肺水肿的影像学表现及其鉴别诊断[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2014, 12 (5): 518-520.
19
姜红坚. 急性肺泡性肺水肿MSCT诊断[J]. 吉林医学,2013, 34(17): 3405-3406.
20
Pesenti A, Musch G, Lichtenstein D, et al. Imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42(5): 686-698.
21
Elicker BM, Jones KT, Naeger DM, et al. Imaging of acute lung injury[J]. Radiologic Clinics, 2016, 54(6): 1119-1132.
22
白 珀,张睢扬. 呼吸衰竭合并心衰患者脱机相关性肺水肿的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2014, 7 (3): 88-90.
23
党彦平. 老年人急性肺水肿为主要表现的急性心肌梗死44例临床分析[J]. 中国临床实用医学,2008, 2 (10): 29-30.
24
毕晓锋,刘国斌,林佩仪. BiPAP在慢性阻塞性肺气肿并发急性呼吸衰竭的应用研究[J]. 中原医刊,2006, 33(9): 27-28.
25
任天成,侯传勇,张 明,等. 三种无创通气模式在急性心源性肺水肿早期救治中的应用分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2015, 18(8): 937-940.
26
王大伟. 呼吸机在急性心源性肺水肿抢救中的应用分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2016, 11(26): 134-135.
27
Platz E, Jhund PS, Campbell RT, et al. Assessment and prevalence of pulmonary oedema in contemporary acute heart failure trials: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2015, 17(9): 906-916.
[1] 马旦杰, 黄品同, 徐琛, 周芳芳, 潘敏强. 超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.
[2] 王培蕾, 夏罕生, 俞清, 闻捷先, 黄备建. IgG4相关性乳腺炎多模态影像学表现及其治疗转归一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 244-247.
[3] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[4] 唐泽耀, 邓呈亮. 影像学技术在淋巴水肿诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 266-270.
[5] 杨林瑞, 陈仁吉. 言语治疗结合经颅磁刺激用于腭裂言语障碍康复的可行性分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 195-199.
[6] 赖圣杰, 方欣, 方友强. 2023年欧洲内分泌学会及加拿大泌尿外科学会肾上腺偶发瘤诊疗指南解读[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 309-312.
[7] 罗道首, 陈树林, 李向东, 李小荣, 柯赛, 崔文志, 何小华. 大细胞肺癌患者的影像学特点及病理临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 642-644.
[8] 游雅婷, 刘熙, 白莉, 郭亮. 肺曲霉菌病患者的影像学及临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 229-233.
[9] 谭明超, 龚明福, 陈佳, 张曦, 孙雅娟. 依据影像学特征的原发性肺类癌的分型及鉴别意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 218-222.
[10] 孙海燕, 周士燕, 张杉杉, 张研, 张茜. 间充质干细胞及其外泌体在高原肺水肿中的潜在治疗机制研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 186-190.
[11] 王永广, 朱鹏, 许千金, 甘桂芬, 石钟山, 潘纯. 急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断标准亟需更新[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 113-117.
[12] 甘曦, 廖鑫. 胃癌旁肿瘤沉积与CT影像学特征、血清指标及病理特征的关联性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 422-425.
[13] 刘亮, 肖浩, 崔晓磊, 吕宝谱, 张睿, 郑拓康, 孟庆冰, 姚冬奇, 田英平, 高恒波. 急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者预后因素分析97例[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-189.
[14] 林盼盼, 张晓磊, 吴仁华. 人文视域下的医学影像诊断学教学改革探索[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 188-192.
[15] 沙宇惠, 梁梦琳, 贾琛皓, 吴娟娟, 张天昊, 朱以诚, 崔瑞雪, 倪俊. 脑淀粉样血管病β淀粉样蛋白沉积特征及其与影像学标志物的关系[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 301-308.
阅读次数
全文


摘要