切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 51 -56. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.01.010

论著

多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性预测分析
蔡小芳1,(), 高慧1, 葛军1, 邢慧芸1, 庄小燕1, 李小丁1   
  1. 1. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院感染科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-28 出版日期:2024-02-25
  • 通信作者: 蔡小芳
  • 基金资助:
    海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(21A200141)

Prediction and analysis of treatment compliance of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis

Xiaofang Cai1,(), Hui Gao1, Jun Ge1, Huiyun Xing1, Xiaoyan Zhuang1, Xiaoding Li1   

  1. 1. Infection Department of Hainan Provincial People′s Hospital, Haikou, 570311 China
  • Received:2023-10-28 Published:2024-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofang Cai
引用本文:

蔡小芳, 高慧, 葛军, 邢慧芸, 庄小燕, 李小丁. 多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 51-56.

Xiaofang Cai, Hui Gao, Jun Ge, Huiyun Xing, Xiaoyan Zhuang, Xiaoding Li. Prediction and analysis of treatment compliance of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(01): 51-56.

目的

分析某地区多重耐药性肺结核治疗情况,构建治疗依从性的预测模型。

方法

选取2019年3月至2022年12月我院收治的148例多重耐药性肺结核患者为对象,Morisky药物依从性量表(Morisky medication adherence scale, MMAS)<6分39例为观察组,MMAS 6~8分109例为对照组,对比两组人口社会学资料和临床资料,多因素Logistic回归分析治疗依从性的影响因素,构建多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性不良的列线图预测模型。

结果

痰培养81例(54.73%)转阴,MMAS评分为(6.15±1.03)分,67例(45.27%)未转阴,MMAS评分为(5.76±1.05)分(P<0.05)。观察组年龄[(51.05±8.23) vs. (46.18±7.59)]岁和服药种数(>6种)[27例(69.23%)vs. 52例(47.71%)]及服药后不良反应[12例(30.77%)vs. 16例(14.68%)]高于对照组,受教育年限[(9.65±2.62) vs. (11.20±3.17)]年、个人平均月收入(<3 000元)[19例(48.72%)vs. 21例(19.27%)]、SSRS评分[(35.15±4.02) vs. (40.36±6.18)]分和疾病宣教比[18例(46.15%)vs. 71例(65.14%)]低于对照组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示:年龄(OR=1.158)、受教育年限(OR=0.815)、个人平均月收入(<3 000元)(OR=27.408)和SSRS评分(OR=0.860)是多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性的影响因素(P<0.05)。列线图预测模型显示:年龄增加5岁,列线图模型评分增加9分;受教育年限减少2年,列线图模型评分增加5分;个人平均月收入<3 000元对应列线图评分27.5分;SSRS评分降低5分,列线图模型增加13.5分。ROC曲线结果显示AUC为0.871(95%CI:0.811~0.931);校准曲线斜率和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验(χ2=7.347,P=0.500)显示模型预测多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性不良的发生风险一致性良好。

结论

多重耐药性肺结核患者治疗6个月后转阴54.73%;年龄增大和受教育年限、个人平均月收入及社会支持水平低是治疗依从性不良的危险因素,列线图模型可用于临床预估治疗依从性不良风险,具有临床意义。

Objective

To analyze the treatment situation of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in a certain area, and to build a prediction model for the treatment compliance of such patients.

Methods

All of 148 patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2022 were selected as the research object, and the treatment status of the patients was followed up for 6 months. 39 patients with Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS) <6 points were the observation group, and 109 patients with MMAS 6-8 points were the control group, the influencing factors of treatment compliance were confirmed by multivariate Logistic regression equation, which was used to construct a nomogram prediction model of poor treatment compliance of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Results

Sputum culture in 81 cases (54.73%) turned negative, MMAS score was (6.15±1.03), 67 cases (45.27%) did not turn negative, MMAS score was (5.76±1.05) points (P<0.05). The age of the observation group [(51.05±8.23) vs. (46.18±7.59)] years, the number of drug types (>6) [27 cases (69.23%) vs. 52 cases (47.71%)] and the adverse reactions after medication [12 cases (30.77%) vs. 16 cases (14.68%)] were higher than those of the control group. Years of education [(9.65±2.62) vs. (11.20±3.17)], average monthly personal income (<3 000 yuan) [19 cases (48.72%) vs. 21 cases (19.27%)], SSRS score [(35.15±4.02) vs. (40.36±6.18)] and the proportion of disease education [18 cases (46.15%) vs. 71 cases (65.14%)] were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression coefficient analysis showed that age (OR=1.158), years of education (OR=0.815), personal average monthly income (<3, 000 yuan) (OR=27.408) and SSRS score (OR=0.860) were independent influencing factors of treatment compliance of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (P<0.05). The nomogram prediction model shows that the score of nomogram model increases by 9 points every time the patient′s age increases by 5 years; For every 2 years of education, the score of nomogram model will increase by 5 points; The nomogram score corresponding to an average monthly income of less than 3, 000 yuan is 27.5 points; For every 5 points of SSRS score reduction, the nomogram model increases by 13.5 points. The ROC curve shows that the AUC of the nomogram prediction model is 0.871 (95%CI: 0.811-0.931). The slope of calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (χ2=7.347, P=0.500) showed that the nomogram model predicted the risk of treatment noncompliance in patients with multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis and the actual risk was in good agreement.

Conclusion

After 6 months of treatment, 54.73% of patients with multi-drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis turned negative. Age, years of education, average monthly income and low level of social support are the independent risk factors of patients′poor treatment compliance. The nomogram model of patients′poor treatment compliance formed by integrating these risk factors can be applied to predict the risk of patients′poor treatment compliance in clinic and provide value for improving the treatment effect of diseases.

表1 两组肺结核患者临床资料对比[n(%)]
表2 治疗依从性的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性不良列线图预测模型
图2 列线图模型的ROC曲线
图3 列线图模型的校准曲线
1
Sossen B, Richards AS, Heinsohn T, et al. The natural history of untreated pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2023, 11(4): 367-379.
2
孟原竹,蒋国路,陈小兵. 肺结核合并侵袭性肺曲霉感染临床特征及危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(4): 541-543.
3
李 燕,倪婷婷. 免疫治疗时代下肺结核对肺癌发生、发展及治疗策略的影响[J]. 重庆医学2023, 52(2): 288-293.
4
汪悠悠. 多重耐药性肺结核患者临床护理中的护理风险与防范[J]. 饮食保健2020, 6(36): 172.
5
Xing W, Zhang R, Jiang W, et al. Adherence to multidrug resistant tuberculosis treatment and case management in Chongqing, China-A mixed method research study[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2021, 14: 999-1012.
6
Alsayed S, Gunosewoyo H. Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, current treatment regimens and new drug targets[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(6): 5202.
7
Marahatta SB, Yadav RK, Baral S, et al. Barriers to treatment compliance of directly observed treatment shortcourse among pulmunary tuberculosis patients[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2021, 19(3): 450-459.
8
徐月梅,叶菊花. 基于行为分阶段转变理论模型的护理对肺结核患者自护能力及治疗依从性的影响[J]. 中国医学创新2023, 20(14): 96-99.
9
王志杰. 肺结核巩固治疗期患者服药依从性的影响因素分析[J]. 中国保健营养2020, 30(25): 297.
10
谢春晖,郭雨微,林 旭,等. 非心脏手术老年患者术后谵妄风险预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志2021, 41(10): 1206-1211.
11
Lu Y, Hu B, Dai H, et al. Predictors of chronic postsurgical pain in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: A multi-center retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2021, 14: 7885-7894.
12
李蕙伊,董雪松. 急性敌草快中毒患者死亡风险列线图预测模型的构建和验证[J]. 中国医科大学学报202352(8): 673-679.
13
姜 琦,闵旭红,王尚虎,等. 食管癌放疗后发生食管狭窄的危险因素及其风险预测列线图模型的构建与验证[J/CD]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2023, 15(2): 132-138.
14
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 肺结核诊断标准(WS 288-2017)[J/CD]. 新发传染病电子杂志2018, 3(1): 59-61.
15
Wu F, Sheng Y. Social support network, social support, self-efficacy, health-promoting behavior and healthy aging among older adults: A pathway analysis[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2019, 85: 103934.
16
兰琨熠,张 清,沈悦好. GMAS、MMAS-8和SEAMS评估慢性病病人用药依从性效能的比较[J]. 护理研究2023, 37(13): 2322-2328.
17
巴桑才仁. 耐多药肺结核患者既往治疗情况对治疗效果的影响研究[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志2018, 5(23): 37.
18
郎 彤. 耐多药肺结核患者既往治疗情况对治疗效果的影响[J/CD]. 全科口腔医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 6(35):167.
19
Madeira DE Oliveira S, Altmayer S, Zanon M, et al. Predictors of noncompliance to pulmonary tuberculosis treatment: An insight from South America[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(9): e0202593.
20
蔡 穆,黎永华. 三亚市肺结核患者治疗依从性特点及其相关影响因素分析[J]. 临床肺科杂志2018, 23(8): 1502-1505.
21
王 可,左利君,郭立平,等. 互联网情境下肺结核病人自我健康管理能力的调查研究[J/CD]. 全科口腔医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 6(30): 187-188.
22
Ridho A, Alfian SD, Van Boven J, et al. Digital health technologies to improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes in patients with tuberculosis: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2022, 24(2): e33062.
23
Parwati NM, Bakta IM, Januraga PP, et al. A health belief model-based motivational interviewing for medication adherence and treatment success in pulmonary tuberculosis patients[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(24): 13238.
24
Abichou K, La Corte V, Nicolas S, et al. False memory in normal ageing: empirical data from the DRM paradigm and theoretical perspectives[J]. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil, 2020, 18(1): 65-75.
25
李 弘,古丽米拉·达列力汗,齐曼古力·吾守尔,等. 人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并肺结核患者抗病毒治疗服药依从性分析[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析2021, 21(7): 872-875.
26
Mekonnen HS, Azagew AW. Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment, reasons and associated factors among TB patients attending at Gondar town health centers, Northwest Ethiopia[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2018, 11(1): 691.
27
黄佳佳,于新秀,王雪英,等. 文化教育程度及治疗依从性对养老社区2型糖尿病患者代谢控制的影响[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志2021, 13(2): 175-178.
28
林天凤. 影响肺结核患者规则服药依从性的相关因素及护理对策分析[J]. 中国社区医师2020, 36(1): 128-129.
29
郑沙沙,周红燕. 肺结核复诊依从性的影响因素[J]. 国际护理学杂志2023, 42(20): 3711-3714.
30
Veesa KS, John KR, Moonan PK, et al. Diagnostic pathways and direct medical costs incurred by new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients prior to anti-tuberculosis treatment-Tamil Nadu, India[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(2): e0191591.
31
张 玲,林昌锋,孙 霞,等. 海南省三亚地区肺结核社会经济学情况调查及影响治愈因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计2023, 40(5): 762-764.
32
Deshmukh RD, Dhande DJ, Sachdeva KS, et al. Social support a key factor for adherence to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment[J]. Indian J Tuberc, 2018, 65(1): 41-47.
33
Florek AG, Wang CJ, Armstrong AW. Treatment preferences and treatment satisfaction among psoriasis patients: a systematic review[J]. Arch Dermatol Res, 2018, 310(4): 271-319.
34
刘晓莉,杜金霞,雷丽梅,等. 肺结核患者失眠与病耻感的相关性研究[J]. 重庆医学2023, 52(4): 629-632.
35
蒋 宇,李 月,刘忆冰,等. 青年初治肺结核患者病耻感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志2023, 29(10): 1333-1337.
36
邱思冲,徐禄玉,李柳宁. 基于SEER数据库恶性脑膜瘤预后列线图的构建与验证[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志2023, 28(1): 30-37.
37
张居洋,曹生亚,李文广,等. 基于流行病学资料及基因单核苷酸多态性的肺癌预测模型的建立[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2019, 38(5): 854-858.
38
Xu K, Zhang L, Ren Z, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict complications in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study from two centers[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 980477.
39
Li M, Yuan T, Li S, et al. Nomogram analysis of the influencing factors of diabetic foot in patients with diabetes mellitus[J]. Hormones (Athens), 2021, 20(2): 333-338.
40
Wu J, Zhang H, Li L, et al. A nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A population-based analysis[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2020, 40(7): 301-312.
[1] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[2] 李圣鹏, 方爱蓝, 刘诗宁, 王丹, 刘湘奇. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的预测因素与评估方法[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 441-445.
[3] 杨立胜, 刘梦鸾, 任维聃, 姜国胜, 刘桂伟. 基于血清肿瘤标志物预测结直肠癌肝转移模型价值分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 39-43.
[4] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[7] 陈晓毅, 尹雪霞, 刘静, 邬国松. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征并发肺动脉高压的危险因素及预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 41-45.
[8] 段丽君, 董鑫, 潘若楠, 任梦然, 卢晓倩, 曹殿波. 术前误诊良性肺结节与典型恶性肺结节临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 46-50.
[9] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[10] 符锋, 蒋显锋, 赵明亮, 云晨, 汤锋武. 运动皮层电刺激治疗中枢性卒中后疼痛四例并文献复习[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 45-50.
[11] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[12] 李冰冰, 张晓萌, 张艳. 住院患者跌倒风险评估工具及预测模型研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1192-1195.
[13] 牟鳄贤, 李卓璇, 董浩, 于淼, 纪娟, 徐佳, 王浩, 刘世伟. 初始腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1027-1032.
[14] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
[15] 孟丽君, 宋芹, 邵莉, 李健. 系统性红斑狼疮合并肺动脉高压患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群水平变化及临床意义[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 38-43.
阅读次数
全文


摘要