切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 925 -930. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.06.013

论著

不同既往癌症病史对PNI-GARS和Lung-RADS 诊断意义
宋飞鹏1,2, 王盈升3, 许洪波1, 吕发金1,()   
  1. 1.400010 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科
    2.030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院放射科
    3.030607 晋中,山西医科大学
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-13 出版日期:2024-12-25
  • 通信作者: 吕发金
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项重点项目(CSTC2021jscx-gksb-N0030)重庆市科卫联合医学研究计划(2022ZDXM006)重庆市卫生适宜技术推广项目(2023jstg044)

Impact of different previous cancer history on the diagnostic efficiency of PNI-GARS and Lung-RADS

Feipeng Song1,2, Yingsheng Wang3, Hongbo Xu1, Fajin Lv1,()   

  1. 1.epartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
    2.Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    3.hanxi Medical University, Jinzhong 030607,China
  • Received:2024-05-13 Published:2024-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Fajin Lv
引用本文:

宋飞鹏, 王盈升, 许洪波, 吕发金. 不同既往癌症病史对PNI-GARS和Lung-RADS 诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 925-930.

Feipeng Song, Yingsheng Wang, Hongbo Xu, Fajin Lv. Impact of different previous cancer history on the diagnostic efficiency of PNI-GARS and Lung-RADS[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(06): 925-930.

目的

分析既往恶性肿瘤病史、既往恶性肿瘤来源对肺部影像报告和数据系统(lung imaging-reporting and data system,Lung-RADS)2022 版及肺结节影像分级评估系统(pulmonary node imaging-grading and reporting system,PNI-GARS)对肺结节诊断的影响。

方法

选择2018 年1 月至2021 年11 月我院收治的既往有癌症病史行肺结节切除术者451 例,收集患者胸部CT 影像和临床资料,依据Lung-RADS 和PNI-GARS 进行分类或分级判断。 根据罹患癌症种类不同分为既往肺癌(prior lung cancer,PLC)组144 例和既往肺外癌(prior extrapulmonary cancer,PEPC)组307 例。 术后组织病理判断Lung-RADS 和PNI-GARS 诊断一致率(agreement rate,AR),比较两种系统的诊断AR 及不同肺结节类型占比。

结果

451 例565 枚肺结节,PLC 组既往癌症病史<5 年135 例,175 枚肺结节;既往癌症病史≥5 年9 例,12 枚肺结节。 PEPC 组既往癌症病史<5 年219 例,278 枚肺结节;既往癌症病史≥5 年88 例,100 枚肺结节。 Lung-RADS 对部分实性结节诊断AR 93.0% 和实性结节88.1% 接近(P=0.131),高于磨玻璃密度结节24.0%(P<0.001)。 PNI-GARS 对部分实性结节诊断AR 高达100%(P<0.001),对实性结节与磨玻璃密度结节的诊断AR 相似(88.5% vs. 84.8%)(P=0.273)。 Lung-RADS 评价既往癌症病史<5 年不同类型肺结节PLC 组诊断AR 58.9%,PEPC 组76.6%(P<0.001); PLC 组(≥5 年)vs. PEPC(≥5 年);PLC(<5 年)vs. PLC(≥5 年);PEPC(<5 年)vs. PEPC(≥5 年)肺结节诊断AR 相似(P>0.05)。 不同组PNI-GARS 的诊断AR 差异无统计学意义,与既往癌症病史、既往恶性肿瘤类型无关。

结论

既往癌症病史和既往恶性肿瘤类型不影响PNI-GARS 诊断,既往癌症病史可能影响Lung-RADS 诊断。

Objective

To investigate the effect of the length and source of malignancy history on the diagnostic efficacy of Lung-RADS (lung imaging-reporting and data system) 2022 and PNI-GARS (pulmonary node imaging-grading and reporting system) in pulmonary nodules (PNs).

Methods

Chest computed tomography and clinical data of PNs in 451 patients with a history of cancer who underwent surgical resection in The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January,2018,to November,2021,were retrospectively collected and evaluated based on Lung-RADS and PNI-GARS,respectively.All PNs were divided into 2 groups:the prior lung cancer (PLC)144 cases and the prior extrapulmonary cancer (PEPC)groups 307cases.The diagnostic agreement rate(AR)of Lung-RADS and PNI-GARS was evaluated based on the pathological diagnosis of nodules after operation.The AR of the two systems and the composition ratios of PNs with different types between different groups were calculated and compared.

Results

A total of 451 patients with 565 PNs were included in this study.These patients were divided into the PLC group (<5 years:135 cases,175 PNs; ≥5 years:9 cases,12 PNs) and the PEPC group (<5 years:219 cases,278 PNs; ≥5 years:88 cases,100 PNs).The diagnostic AR of Lung-RADS of partial solid nodules (93.0%) and solid nodules (88.1%) was close (P = 0.131),while both were higher than that of the ground-glass nodules(24.0%,all P values <0.001).However,the diagnostic AR of PNI-GARS of partial solid nodules was the highest (100%,all P<0.001),and the AR of solid nodules and ground glass nodules were similar with each other (88.5% vs. 84.8%, P=0.273).Within 5 years,the composition ratio of PNs and the diagnostic AR of Lung-RADS (PLC:58.9%,PEPC:76.6%) between the PLC and PEPC groups were all different (all P values<0.001),and the others (composition ratio of PNs & the diagnostic AR:PLC (≥5 years) vs. PEPC(≥5 years); PLC (<5 years) vs. PLC (≥5 years); PEPC (<5 years) vs. PEPC (≥5 years) were similar(all P values >0.05).On the contrary,the diagnostic AR for PNI-GARS did not vary regardless of the length of previous cancer history or the type of previous malignancy.

Conclusion

The diagnostic efficiency of PNI-GARS would not be affected by the length of previous cancer history and the origin of previous malignancy,and the length of prior cancer history may impact the diagnostic performance of Lung-RADS.

表1 患者的人口基线和临床特征
图1 患者第二原发肺癌的组织学类型和分期。 注:SN:实性结节;GGN:磨玻璃密度结节;PSN:部分实性结节;AIS;原位腺癌;MIA:微浸润性腺癌;AIC:浸润性腺癌;SCC:鳞状细胞癌
表2 不同类型肺结节诊断AR 比较
表3 不同类型肺结节构成比和AR 比较[n(%)]
1
Sharma R.Mapping of global,regional and national incidence,mortality and mortality-to-incidence ratio of lung cancer in 2020 and 2050[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2022,27(4):665-675.
2
Xia C,Dong X,Li H,et al.Cancer statistics in China and United States,2022:profiles,trends,and determinants[J].Chin Med J,2022,135(5):584-590.
3
O'Dwyer E,Halpenny DF,Ginsberg MS.Lung cancer screening in patients with previous malignancy:is this cohort at increased risk for malignancy? [J].Europ Radiol,2021,31(1):458-467.
4
American College of Radiology Committee on Lung-RADS.Lung-RADS 2022.Available at:https:/ / www.acr.org/-/media/ ACR/Files/RADS/Lung-RADS/ Lung- RADS-2022.pdf.Accessed on November 21,2022.
5
National Comprehensive Cancer Network.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:Lung Cancer Screening.Version 1,2021.Available at:https:/ /www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/lung_screening.pdf.Accessed December 17,2021.
6
Swensen SJ,Silverstein MD,Ilstrup DM,et al.The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules:application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules[J].Arch Int Med,1997,157(8):849-855.
7
王 欣,徐跃华,杜紫燕,等.孤立性肺结节的CT 影像学特征及良恶性预测模型的建立[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2018,40(2):115-120.
8
Bankier AA,MacMahon H,Goo JM,et al.Recommendations for measuring pulmonary nodules at CT:a statement from the Fleischner Society[J].Radiol,2017,285(2):584-600.
9
Song F,Yang Q,Gong T,et al.Comparison of different classification systems for pulmonary nodules:a multicenter retrospective study in China[J].Cancer Imag,2024,24(1):15.
10
Duan L,Shan W,Bo G,et al.Qualitative (and quantitative)values of the lung-rads and computed tomography in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules[J].Diagnost,2022,12(11):2699.
11
Lee HY,Hsieh MS,Liao HC,et al.Previous extrapulmonary malignancies impact outcomes in patients with surgically resected lung cancer[J].Front Surg,2021,8:747249.
12
Liu J,Hu Z,Feng Y,et al.Problems to affect long-term survival for breast cancer patients:an observational study of subsequent lung/bronchus malignancies[J].Med,2018,97(39):e12603.
13
Deng L,Harethardottir H,Song H,et al.Mortality of lung cancer as a second primary malignancy:a population-based cohort study[J].Cancer Med,2019,8(6):3269-3277.
14
Laccetti AL,Pruitt SL,Xuan L,et al.Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer:A national SEER-medicare analysis[J].Lung Cancer,2016,98:106-113.
15
张 艳,吕发金,褚志刚,等.基于CT 薄层影像特征的肺结节良恶性评估[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2019,27(3):182-187.
16
张 艳.基于CT 影像学特征的肺结节良恶性鉴别研究[D].重庆医科大学,2019:23-27.
17
Reinmuth N,Stumpf P,Stumpf A,et al.Characteristics of lung cancer after a previous malignancy[J].Respirat Med,2014,108(6):910-917.
18
Wu GX,Nelson RA,Kim JY,et al.Non-small cell lung cancer as a second primary among patients with previous malignancy:who is at risk? [J].Clin Lung Cancer,2017,18(5):543-550.
19
Henderson LM,Durham DD,Tammemägi MC,et al.Lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography in patients with and without prior history of cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial[J].J Thorac Oncol,2021,16(6):980-989.
20
陈文辉,沈起钧.国内外肺癌筛查指南的对照解读[J].浙江医学,2023,45(3):225-228.
21
McKee BJ,Hashim JA,French RJ,et al.Experience with a CT screening program for individuals at high risk for developing lung cancer[J].J Am Coll Radiol,2015,12(2):192-197.
22
Halpenny DF,Cunningham JD,Long NM,et al.Patients with a previous history of malignancy undergoing lung cancer screening:clinical characteristics and radiologic findings[J].J Thorac Oncol,2016,11(9):1447-1452.
23
Liu Z,Yang H,Wang H,et al.Research progress in 3d-reconstruction based imaging analysis in partial solid pulmonary nodule[J].Chin J Lung Cancer,2022,25(2):124-129.
24
Zhang BW,Zhang Y,Ye JD,et al.Use of relative CT values to evaluate the invasiveness of pulmonary subsolid nodules in patients with emphysema[J].Quantitat Imag Med Surg,2021,11(1):204-214.
25
White CS,Dharaiya E,Dalal S,et al.Vancouver risk calculator compared with ACR Lung-RADS in predicting malignancy:analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial[J].Radiol,2019,291(1):205-211.
26
Hammer MM,Palazzo LL,Kong CY,et al.Cancer risk in subsolid nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial[J].Radiol,2019,293(2):441-448.
27
Yu J Y,Lee B,Ju S,et al.Proportion and characteristics of transient nodules in a retrospective analysis of pulmonary nodules[J].Thorac Cancer,2012,3(3):224-228.
[1] 郑永乐, 庞祖才, 陈家敏, 孙丙银. 骨碎补总黄酮抑制牵张成骨模型骨质疏松的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 604-608.
[2] 王世美, 薛超, 李志鹏, 蔡伟鑫. 基于锥形束CT的下牙槽神经管走行测量分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 237-242.
[3] 钱春蕊, 周燕, 张晶, 蔡笃财, 门慧, 王松海, 黎莉, 邢龙. 高分辨率CT 与多层螺旋CT 在肺结节及早期肺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 827-830.
[4] 犹成亿, 尤恒, 叶东樊, 张雯, 刘禹, 王仁宇, 苏琳茜, 甘慧, 徐智. 基于3D Res U-Net-Faster RCNN 技术和CT 影像学特征的肺结节性质预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 673-679.
[5] 刘锦程, 王斌, 张雯, 张明周, 刘禹, 叶东樊, 黄赞胜, 邱凌霄, 卿斌, 王创业, 王南博, 王苹, 郭宇航, 周培花, 程秋霞, 徐智. 肺泡灌洗液RASSF1A及SHOX2甲基化联合径向超声特征对肺结节性质鉴别诊断的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 505-511.
[6] 孙志红, 庞红艳, 王睿. 呼出气体中VOCs联合CT征象诊断非实性肺结节的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 442-445.
[7] 沙敏, 瞿秋霞, 朱卫东, 陈成. 肺结核与肺结节病相关肉芽肿组织中CXCR5的差异性表达[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 189-194.
[8] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[9] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[10] 孙铭远, 褚恒, 徐海滨, 张哲. 人工智能应用于多发性肺结节诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 785-790.
[11] 杨松林, 黄仕豪, 王丽珠, 李禧萌, 邹飞翔, 李坤炜, 梁明柱, 陈炳辉. 良性肺结节生长变化的影像学评价[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-350.
[12] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[13] 王嘉巍, 张广健, 杜昊楠, 余宸傲, 张佳. 混合现实技术在肺结节手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 254-259.
[14] 王宇, 张泽锴, 吴明胜, 王高祥, 孙效辉, 王君, 徐美青, 李田, 徐世斌, 解明然. 术后病理诊断为良性肺结节323例患者临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 167-174.
[15] 刘云泽, 李宬润, 任红, 郭俊唐, 刘阳. CT影像组学在肺结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 120-129.
阅读次数
全文


摘要