切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 197 -204. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.02.003

论著

STE20家族基因在559例肺鳞癌中的表达及临床意义
袁婷1, 陈婷婷1, 毛杨2, 王文静2, 李德峰2,()   
  1. 1400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院心内科
    2400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-13 出版日期:2026-04-25
  • 通信作者: 李德峰
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金博士后科学基金(cstc2021jcyj bshX0071)

Comprehensive analysis of STE20 family gene expression, immune infiltration, prognosis, and partial experimental validation in 559 patients of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma

Ting Yuan1, Tingting Chen1, Yang Mao2, Wenjing Wang2, Defeng Li2,()   

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University(Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400037
    2Clinical Medical Research Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University(Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400037
  • Received:2025-06-13 Published:2026-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Defeng Li
引用本文:

袁婷, 陈婷婷, 毛杨, 王文静, 李德峰. STE20家族基因在559例肺鳞癌中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 197-204.

Ting Yuan, Tingting Chen, Yang Mao, Wenjing Wang, Defeng Li. Comprehensive analysis of STE20 family gene expression, immune infiltration, prognosis, and partial experimental validation in 559 patients of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(02): 197-204.

目的

探讨STE20家族基因在肺鳞癌(lung squamous cell carcinoma, LUSC)中的表达特征、临床意义及与免疫浸润关系,分析预后标志物和治疗靶点潜在价值。

方法

整合TCGA、GTEx及GEO数据库(GSE229509、GSE268175)中85例正常肺组织和559例LUSC组织的转录组数据,分析STE20家族成员在LUSC中表达差异。采用ESTIMATE和TIMER数据库判断STE20s与免疫细胞浸润的相关性。通过LASSO回归构建预后风险模型,利用随机森林模型判断MST4的预后。采用GO和KEGG富集分析探讨MST4潜在功能。通过qRT-PCR和Western blotting在LUSC细胞系(NCIH520、H-1703、SK MES 1)中验证关键基因表达。

结果

STE20家族中SPAK、PAK1、PAK6及MST4在LUSC组织中表达上调(P<0.05),MST1、OSR1、TAO2、MINK、TNIK、LOK表达下调(P<0.05)。免疫浸润分析显示,MST3、MYO3B、TNIK与免疫评分呈正相关,MST1、MST4、PAK1、PAK6与免疫评分呈负相关。TIMER分析表明,MST4表达与CD8 T细胞(r=-0.23,P<0.001)、CD4 T细胞(r=-0.19,P<0.01)及巨噬细胞浸润(r=-0.21,P<0.001)呈负相关。LASSO回归筛选出5个预后相关基因(PAK1、PAK6、MST1、OSR1、MST4),风险评分模型显示高风险组总生存期显著短于低风险组(HR=2.34,95%CI:1.78~3.08,P<0.001)。随机森林模型预测1年、3年、5年生存率的受试者工作特征工作(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.71、0.75、0.75。MST4高表达与不良预后相关(HR=1.89,95%CI:1.42~2.51,P<0.001)。GO/KEGG富集分析显示MST4参与细胞周期、ECM受体互作及EMT相关通路。qRT-PCR和Western blotting验证结果显示,LUSC细胞系中PAK1、PAK6、MST4 mRNA及蛋白表达水平高于正常肺上皮细胞(BEAS-2B)(P<0.01),MST1和OSR1表达水平降低(P<0.01)。

结论

STE20家族基因在LUSC中表达异常,与免疫浸润及预后密切相关。MST4可能通过调控细胞周期和ECM重塑促进LUSC进展,可作为预后标志物和治疗靶点。

Objective

To investigate the expression characteristics and clinical significance of STE20 family genes in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and to explore their association with immune infiltration and their potential as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Methods

Transcriptomic data from TCGA, GTEx, and GEO databases (GSE229509, GSE268175) comprising 85 normal lung tissues and 559 LUSC tissues were integrated to analyze the differential expression of STE20 family members. ESTIMATE and TIMER databases were used to evaluate the correlation between STE20s and immune cell infiltration. LASSO regression was employed to construct a prognostic risk model, and random forest model was used to assess the prognostic value of MST4. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed to explore the potential functions of MST4. qRT-PCR and Western blotting were used to validate the expression of key genes in LUSC cell lines (NCIH520, H-1703, SK MES 1).

Results

Among STE20 family members, SPAK, PAK1, PAK6, and MST4 were significantly upregulated in LUSC tissues (P<0.05), while MST1, OSR1, TAO2, MINK, TNIK, and LOK were significantly downregulated (P<0.05). Immune infiltration analysis revealed that MST3, MYO3B, and TNIK were positively correlated with immune scores, whereas MST1, MST4, PAK1, and PAK6 were negatively correlated. TIMER analysis showed that MST4 expression was significantly negatively correlated with infiltration of CD8+ T cells (r=-0.23, P<0.001), CD4+ T cells (r=-0.19, P<0.01), and macrophages (r=-0.21, P<0.001). LASSO regression identified five prognosis-related genes (PAK1, PAK6, MST1, OSR1, MST4). The risk score model indicated that the high-risk group had significantly shorter overall survival than the low-risk group (HR=2.34, 95%CI: 1.78~3.08, P<0.001). The random forest model predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival achieved AUC values of 0.71, 0.75, and 0.75, respectively. High MST4 expression was associated with poor prognosis (HR=1.89, 95%CI: 1.42~2.51, P<0.001). GO/KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that MST4 is involved in cell cycle, ECM-receptor interaction, and EMT-related pathways. qRT-PCR and Western blotting confirmed that mRNA and protein levels of PAK1, PAK6, and MST4 were significantly higher in LUSC cell lines than in normal lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) (P<0.01), while MST1 and OSR1 were significantly lower (P<0.01).

Conclusion

STE20 family genes are aberrantly expressed in LUSC and are closely associated with immune infiltration and prognosis. MST4, as a key member, may promote LUSC progression by regulating cell cycle and ECM remodeling, highlighting its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

图1 肺鳞癌中STE20s mRNA表达。图A为TCGA的配对LUSC和正常组织中STE20s的mRNA表达;图B为TCGA和GTEx非配对LUSC和正常组织中STE20s的mRNA表达(*P<0.05)注:LUSC为肺鳞癌;Nor为正常组
图2 STE20s与肺鳞癌免疫浸润的相关性A:EstimateScore、ImmuneScore和StromalScore评估STE20s在肺鳞癌中免疫浸润分数;B:STE20s表达与EstimateScore、ImmuneScore和StromalScore免疫浸润得分最正相关的前6个STE20s(MST3、STK10、TNIK、MST1、MST4和OSR1);C:LUSC中免疫检查点相关性分析注:StromalScore为肿瘤微环境中间质细胞比例;ImmuneScore为免疫细胞比例;EstimateScore为对应两个比例总和
图3 MST4在肺鳞癌中功能富集分析及关键生物标志物表达验证。图A为MST4的DEGs,|Log2FC|>1,P<0.05;图B为MST4的GO分析;图C为MST4的KEGG分析;图D为NCIH520细胞系中验证关键生物标志物表达;图E为H-1703细胞系中验证关键生物标志物表达;图F为SK MES 1细胞系中验证关键生物标志物表达;图G为Western blotting检测NCIH520细胞系和对应正常细胞系中5个关键生物标志物蛋白表达水平注:BP为生物过程;CC为细胞组成;MF为分子功能;*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001
1
杨丽,刘雪萍,贺斌峰,等. miR-126调控肺鳞癌细胞增殖的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(6): 664-669.
2
Pankova OV, Rodionov EO, Miller SV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with intraoperative radiotherapy is effective to prevent recurrence in high-risk non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2020, 9(4): 988-999.
3
段楚骁,李梦晨,付圣灵,等. CK14在低分化非小细胞肺癌中区分鳞癌和腺癌的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(6): 651-652.
4
Arbour KC, Riely GJ. Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer:a review[J]. Jama, 2019, 322(8): 764-774.
5
Lai YH, Chen WN, Hsu TC, et al. Overall survival prediction of non-small cell lung cancer by integrating microarray and clinical data with deep learning[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 4679.
6
Zinatizadeh MR, Miri SR, Zarandi PK, et al. The hippo tumor suppressor pathway (YAP/TAZ/TEAD/MST/LATS) and EGFR-RAS-RAF-MEK in cancer metastasis[J]. Genes Dis, 2019, 8(1): 48-60.
7
Wang G, Lu X, Dey P, et al. Targeting YAP-dependent MDSC infiltration impairs tumor progression[J]. Cancer Discov, 2016, 6: 80-95.
8
Guo X, Zhao Y, Yan H, et al. Single tumor-initiating cells evade immune clearance by recruiting type II macrophages[J]. Genes Dev, 2017, 31: 247-259.
9
Janse van Rensburg HJ, Azad T, Ling M, et al. The Hippo pathway component TAZ promotes immune evasion in human cancer through PD-L1[J]. Cancer Res, 2018, 78: 1457-1470.
10
Ru B, Wong CN, Tong Y, et al. TISIDB: an integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions[J]. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35(20): 4200-4202.
11
Šutic M, Dmitrovic B, Jakovcevic A, et al. Transcriptomic profiling for prognostic biomarkers in early-stage squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC) [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(4): 720.
12
Mao G, Li J, Wang N, et al. SIRPG promotes lung squamous cell carcinoma pathogenesis via M1 macrophages: a multi-omics study integrating data and Mendelian randomization[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14: 1392417.
13
Zhou Ling, Wang Heng, Fang Zhi, et al. The microRNA-381(miR-381)/Spindlin1(SPIN1) axis contributes to cell proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway[J]. Bioengineered, 2021, 12(2): 12036-12048.
14
Malik P, Rani R, Solanki R, et al. Understanding the feasibility of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic targets against non-small cell lung cancers: an update of resistant responses and recent combinatorial therapies[J]. Explor Target Antitumor Ther, 2023, 4(5): 850-895.
15
Zinatizadeh MR, Miri SR, Zarandi PK, et al. The hippo tumor suppressor pathway (YAP/TAZ/TEAD/MST/LATS) and EGFR-RAS-RAF-MEK in cancer metastasis[J]. Genes Dis, 2019, 8(1): 48-60.
16
Hu Y, Wang B, Wang L, et al. Mammalian STE20 like kinase 1 regulates pancreatic cancer cell survival and migration through Mfn2 mediated mitophagy [J]. Mol Med Rep, 2020, 22(1): 398-404.
17
Kühnel F. Ste20-like Kinase STK25: A potential target in prevention and therapy of NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma?[J]. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 13(2): 676-677.
18
Chuang HC, Tan TH. MAP4K3/GLK in autoimmune disease, cancer and aging[J]. J Biomed Sci, 2019, 26(1): 82.
19
Sharif AAD, Hergovich A. The NDR/LATS protein kinases in immunology and cancer biology[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2018, 48: 104-114.
20
Wang Y, Jia A, Cao Y, et al. Hippo kinases MST1/2 regulate immune cell functions in cancer, infection, and autoimmune diseases[J]. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr, 2020, 30(5): 427-442.
21
Luo F, Zhou J, Wang S, et al. microRNA-222 promotes colorectal cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting MST3[J]. FEBS Open Bio, 2019, 9(5): 901-913.
22
Arora R, Kim JH, Getu AA, et al. MST4: A potential oncogene and therapeutic target in breast cancer[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(24): 4057.
23
An L, Nie P, Chen M, et al. MST4 kinase suppresses gastric tumorigenesis by limiting YAP activation via a non-canonical pathway[J]. J Exp Med, 2020, 217(6): e20191817.
24
Christofides A, Strauss L, Yeo A, et al. The complex role of tumor-infiltrating macrophages [J]. Nat Immunol, 2022, 23(8): 1148-1156.
25
Lei X, Lei Y, Li JK, et al. Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment: Biological functions and roles in cancer immunotherapy[J]. Cancer Lett, 2020, 470: 126-133.
26
Peña-Romero AC, Orenes-Piñero E. Dual effect of immune cells within tumour microenvironment: pro-and anti-tumour effects and their triggers [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(7): 1681.
27
Zhang Y, Zhang Z. The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy:understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications [J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2020, 17(8): 807-821.
28
Yuan H, Liu J, Zhang J. The current landscape of immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(5): 1392.
29
Anichini A, Perotti VE, Sgambelluri F, et al. Immune escape mechanisms in non small cell lung cancer [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(12): 3605.
30
Lutfi F, Wu L, Sunshine S, et al. Targeting the CD27-CD70 Pathway to improve outcomes in both checkpoint immunotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 715909.
31
Hui E, Cheung J, Zhu J, et al. T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1-mediated inhibition [J]. Science, 2017, 355(6332): 1428-1433.
32
Kean MJ, Ceccarelli DF, Goudreault M, et al. Structure-function analysis of core STRIPAK Proteins: a signaling complex implicated in Golgi polarization [J]. J Biol Chem, 2011, 286(28): 25065-25075.
33
Wang R, Wu ST, Yang X, et al. Pdcd10-Stk24/25 complex controls kidney water reabsorption by regulating Aqp2 membrane targeting [J]. JCI Insight, 2021, 6(12): e142838.
[1] 李乐桐, 林加曼, 王强. 1-磷酸鞘氨醇受体1 在乳腺癌患者中的表达及其对预后和免疫浸润的影响[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 105-114.
[2] 李怡泉, 谢宇斌, 胡宏, 张燕茹, 陈图锋. 基于生物信息学分析HDAC8在结肠癌中的临床意义及其与免疫浸润的关系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 275-281.
[3] 王欢欢, 郑少祥, 郝金锦, 陈文亮. 胃癌分子分型的研究进展及相关联系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 229-234.
[4] 李洁, 吴迪, 刘璐, 赵冰鹤, 王浩亚, 王鑫鑫, 谢天宇. 昼夜节律基因与结直肠癌恶性进展的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 170-174.
[5] 王勇, 黄铁模, 于守君. RPS21在肝细胞癌中的表达及与免疫浸润和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 413-417.
[6] 唐林娟, 王槿樾, 王欣, 黄娜, 杨凯. 嘌呤生物合成关键酶PAICS在肺腺癌中的表达及功能研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 942-948.
[7] 赵才林, 向青, 钱航, 施雯, 邱凌霄, 王斌. 基于生物信息学解析急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征铁死亡枢纽基因及其与免疫分型的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 503-509.
[8] 贾乃龙, 李传资, 王绥煌, 张余鹏, 林志华, 林昌昆, 黄垂志. 低剂量能谱CT结合多平面重建技术对肺癌和肺炎性结节鉴别诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 247-251.
[9] 王志鹏, 张倩, 黄燕华, 孙赟, 方晓明, 施宇佳. 肺鳞癌血清外泌体hsa_circ_0018430的表达和临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 774-778.
[10] 袭厚榕, 隋晓峰. 基于生物信息学分析乳腺癌组织STIP1表达在免疫浸润中的作用[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 208-216.
[11] 郑希彦, 吴润鹏, 杜飞, 谢玉芬, 王平根, 张广权, 翟航, 何函樨, 李瑞曦. 基于生信分析SLC29A3 在肝癌中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 290-295.
[12] 曾谣, 谢琴, 陈显育, 王平根, 毛玲秋, 何丹玲, 杜飞, 郑希彦, 何函樨. CDC42EP2基因与肝癌预后、免疫细胞浸润关系及其对细胞迁移侵袭的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 363-369.
[13] 程亚飞, 任长远, 李海马, 孙恺, 马亚群. FSTL1基因在胶质瘤发展中作用的研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 206-215.
[14] 李燕, 姚毅冰, 毛志远, 于海燕, 刘昕, 樊再雯. NCAPH在肺鳞癌中表达的临床意义及与免疫微环境浸润的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 446-454.
[15] 曹琪, 罗治文, 车云. CD68蛋白可预测ⅠB期肺鳞癌术后复发风险[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2025, 12(03): 144-151.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?