Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05): 539-543. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2019.05.001

• Original Article •     Next Articles

Clinical analysis of intrapleural therapy with endostar or cisplatin for primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion

Zhoufei Wang1, Zihan Xu1, Guangkuo Zhu1, Wenlei Zhuo1, Zhengtang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Cancer Research Institute of PLA, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2019-05-08 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2021-07-19
  • Contact: Zhengtang Chen

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the clinical data of 69 patients with primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and explore the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of endostar and cisplatin in the treatment of lung cancer mediated MPE through intrapleural injection.

Methods

The clinical data of 69 patients with lung cancer mediated MPE in our hospital from 2016 to June 2018 were collected for this study. They were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic regimen: 23 cases were treated with endostar (30 mg through intrapleural injection, twice a week) and the rest 46 cases were treated with cisplatin (30 mg/m2 through intrapleural injection, twice a week). The curative effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed and analyzed.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.5% in the endostar group, which was significantly higher than that in the cisplatin group (26.1%, P<0.05). Stratified analysis showed that in the patients with bloody pleural effusion, the ORRs were 88.9% in the endostar group and 5% in the cisplatin group, and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). In the patients with non-bloody pleural effusion, the ORRs were 35.7% in the endostar group and 42.3% in the cisplatin group. In the patients with lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values (<100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion, the ORRs were 53.8% in the endostar group and 8.3% in the cisplatin group, and statistical significant difference was found between the two groups (P<0.05). In the patients with higher CEA values (>100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion, the ORRs were 50% in the endostar group and 45.4% in the cisplatin group.

Conclusion

Intrapleural therapy of endostar is a safe and effective method for the patients with lung cancer mediated MPE, which shows a higher curative rate than that of cisplatin. The therapeutic effect is more obvious especially for the patients with bloody pleural effusion and the patients with lower CEA values (<100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion. And the endostar group has less adverse reactions and better safety than the cisplatin group. Furthermore, endostar can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients.

Key words: Bronchogenic carcinoma, Malignant pleural effusion, Endostar, Cisplatin, Intrapleural injection

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 023-65425691 E-mail: xqcjld@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd