Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03): 447-451. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2025.03.019

• Original articles • Previous Articles    

Risk analysis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with mechanical ventilation

Limei Xu1, Haiyan Wu1, Haili Lin1, Shunni Ji1, Chunru Chen1, Jiaojiao Fu1, Zhongren Chen2, Xiaomei Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology,Haikou People's Hospital,Haikou 570208,China
    2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Haikou People's Hospital,Haikou 570208,China
  • Received:2025-02-27 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-17
  • Contact: Xiaomei Wu

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with mechanical ventilation based on an interpretable machine learning model.

Methods

All of 77 patients with mechanical ventilation in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2024 were selected. 19 cases with VAP were divided into the observation group and 58 cases without VAP were divided into the control group. Clinical data were collected,and the features related to VAP were screened by LASSO regression analysis. Logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine were used. SVM,multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (xGBoost) were four machine learning(ML) algorithms to construct the prediction model,and SHAP was used to analyze the interpretability of the model.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ,APACHEⅡ) (21.53±2.50) minutes and mechanical ventilation time (10.37±3.30) d were higher than those of control group (18.59±2.80) minutes and mechanical ventilation time (8.38±2.55) d. Glasgow score (10.79±2.07) and albumin level (30.08±3.79) g/L in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (12.14±1.94) and albumin level (34.22±5.20) g/L. There were significant differences in age,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,diabetes,sedative use and antibiotic type between observation group and control group (P <0.05). LASSO regression results showed that age,APACHE Ⅱscore,mechanical ventilation time and albumin were risk factors for VAP in patients with mechanical ventilation. Four ML models were constructed based on the above four risk factors,and the area under the curve(AUC) of xGBoost model was 0.882,the accuracy was 81.30%,the sensitivity was 84.00%,and the specificity was 82.00%. SHAP results showed that the top 4 characteristics of VAP risk contribution were APACHE Ⅱscore,age,mechanical ventilation time and albumin.

Conclusion

xGBoost model has high sensitivity and specificity,which can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool to quickly and accurately determine the risk of VAP in patients with mechanical ventilation,and provide reference for clinical decision-making.

Key words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Mechanical ventilation, Machine learning, Risk analysis

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 023-65425691 E-mail: xqcjld@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd