径向探头超声支气管镜引导支气管透壁肺活检术在外周肺病变诊断中的应用

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2019.05.009

目的

探讨径向探头超声支气管镜引导支气管透壁肺活检术(R-EBUS-TBLB)在外周肺病变(PPLs)诊断中的价值及应用，评估其诊断成功率、影响因素及安全性。

方法

回顾性总结2017年8月至2019年1月在我科接受R-EBUS-TBLB检查的86例患者的临床资料，观察R-EBUS对病灶的定位能力，分析其诊断成功率及影响因素，观察有无并发症，进行安全性评估。

结果

R-EBUS病灶探及率为89.53%(77/86)，R-EBUS-TBLB在PPLs中的总诊断率为59.30%(51/86)，对直径≥2 cm、位于中下叶、距离肺门近、超声内部回声不均匀、边缘不连续的病灶确诊率均高于直径<2 cm、位于上叶、距离肺门远、超声内部回声均匀、边缘连续的病灶(P<0.05)；病灶包绕超声探头的诊断率为78.26%(36/46)，病灶边缘临近超声探头的诊断率为41.94%(13/31)，两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。R-EBUS-TBLB对PPLs的诊断敏感性为59.30%，特异性为100%，阳性预测值以及阴性预测值分别为100%和42.22%。R-EBUS-TBLB的安全性较高，86例受检者中仅有7例需要镜下局部止血，其余均为少量出血，无需特殊处理，未见气胸等并发症的发生。

结论

R-EBUS-TBLB安全有效，对PPLs有重要的诊断意义和较高的应用价值。病灶大小、部位以及超声探头和病灶的位置关系是影响R-EBUS-TBLB诊断效能的主要因素。

关键词: 超声支气管镜, 外周肺病变, 支气管透壁肺活检, 测量技术

Objective

To explore the application and value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscope for transbronchial lung biopsy (R-EBUS-TBLB) in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) and to evaluate the diagnostic success rate, influencing factors and safety.

Methods

The clinical data of 86 patients with PPLs who received R-EBUS-TBLB in our hospital from August 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively summarized. The ability of R-EBUS to locate the lesions was observed, the success rate of diagnosis and its influencing factors were analyzed, and the complications were observed for safety assessment.

Results

The detection rate of R-EBUS for lesions was 89.53% (77/86) and the total diagnosis rate of R-EBUS-TBLB in the patients with PPLs was 59.30% (51/86). The diagnosis rate of the lesions with the diameter ≥2 cm, being located in the middle or lower lobe, close to the hilum, with uneven echo inside the ultrasound, and with discontinuous edges was higher than that of the lesions with the diameter <2 cm, being located in the upper lobe, far from the hilum, with uniform echo inside the ultrasound, and with continuous edges (P<0.05). The diagnosis rate of the lesions wrapping the ultrasonic probe was 78.26% (36/46) and the diagnosis rate of the lesions whose edges were adjacent to the ultrasonic probe was 41.94 % (13/31). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity of R-EBUS-TBLB to PPLs was 59.30%, the specificity was 100%, and the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 100% and 42.22%, respectively. The safety of R-EBUS-TBLB was relatively high. Only 7 out of the 86 subjects needed local hemostasis under the microscope, and the rest with small amounts of bleeding needed no special treatment. No pneumothorax or other complications were observed.

Conclusion

R-EBUS-TBLB is safe and effective, which has an important diagnostic significance and a high application value for PPLs. The size and location of the lesions, the relationship between the ultrasonic probe, and the location of the lesions are the main factors affecting the diagnostic efficacy of R-EBUS-TBLB.

Key words: Endobronchial ultrasonography, Peripheral pulmonary lesions, Transbronchial lung biopsy, Measurement techniques

图1 正常R-EBUS超声图像呈暴风雪改变

图2 A：胸部CT示PPL(左肺上叶结节)；B：R-EBUS示超声探头位于病灶内；C：TBLB病理回报肺腺癌(HE ×100)

图3 A：胸部CT示PPL(右肺上叶密度增高影)；B：R-EBUS示超声探头位于病灶边缘；C：TBLB病理回报肺结核(HE ×100)

表1 R-EBUS-TBLB诊断率与超声探头位置、超声图像特征、病灶大小、病灶位置以及麻醉方式的关系比较

临床资料		例数	确诊例数(%)	χ²值	P值
超声探头位置
	在病灶内	46	36(78.26)	15.852	<0.001
	邻近病灶	31	13(41.94)
	未探及病灶	9	2(22.22)
超声图像边缘
	连续	41	20(48.78)	7.047	0.008
	不连续	36	29(80.56)
超声内部回声
	均匀	31	12(38.71)	12.188	<0.001
	不均匀	46	37(80.43)
病灶直径大小
	直径≥3 cm	19	16(84.21)	19.896	<0.001
	2 cm≤直径<3 cm	44	37(61.36)
	直径<2 cm	23	8(34.78)
病灶位置
	双上叶	21	7(33.33)	8.202	0.017
	右中叶	35	25(71.42)
	双下叶	30	19(63.33)
病灶与肺门距离
	距离肺门≥5 cm	41	18(43.90)	6.528	0.011
	距离肺门<5 cm	45	33(73.33)
麻醉方式
	局麻	23	12(52.17)	0.319	0.572
	全麻	63	39(61.90)

表1 R-EBUS-TBLB诊断率与超声探头位置、超声图像特征、病灶大小、病灶位置以及麻醉方式的关系比较

临床资料		例数	确诊例数(%)	χ²值	P值
超声探头位置
	在病灶内	46	36(78.26)	15.852	<0.001
	邻近病灶	31	13(41.94)
	未探及病灶	9	2(22.22)
超声图像边缘
	连续	41	20(48.78)	7.047	0.008
	不连续	36	29(80.56)
超声内部回声
	均匀	31	12(38.71)	12.188	<0.001
	不均匀	46	37(80.43)
病灶直径大小
	直径≥3 cm	19	16(84.21)	19.896	<0.001
	2 cm≤直径<3 cm	44	37(61.36)
	直径<2 cm	23	8(34.78)
病灶位置
	双上叶	21	7(33.33)	8.202	0.017
	右中叶	35	25(71.42)
	双下叶	30	19(63.33)
病灶与肺门距离
	距离肺门≥5 cm	41	18(43.90)	6.528	0.011
	距离肺门<5 cm	45	33(73.33)
麻醉方式
	局麻	23	12(52.17)	0.319	0.572
	全麻	63	39(61.90)

1	Fuso L, Varone F, Magnini D, et al. Role of ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Lung Cancer, 2013, 81(1): 60-64.
2	Jacobs PC, Mall WP, Grobbee DE, et al. Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: a systematic review[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2008, 32(2): 214-221.
3	Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines[J]. Chest, 2013, 143(5 Suppl): e142S-e165S.
4	Wang C, Li X, Zhou Z, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography with guide sheath versus computed tomography guided transthoracic needle biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a propensity score matched analysis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(10): 2758-2764.
5	Muñoz-Largacha JA, Litle VR, Fernando HC, et al. Navigation bronchoscopy for diagnosis and small nodule location[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(Suppl 2): S98-S103.
6	Casutt A, Prella M, Beigelman-Aubry C, et al. Fluoroscopic-guided radial endobronchial ultrasound without guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A safe and efficient combination[J]. Arch Bronconeumol, 2015, 51(7): 338-343.
7	Ali MS, Trick W, Mba BI, et al. Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Respirology, 2017, 22 (3): 443-453.
8	Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, et al. Analysis of the internal structure of peripheral pulmonary lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography[J]. Chest, 2002, 122(6): 1887-1894.
9	Hayama M, Izumo T, Matsumoto Y, et al. Complications with endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Respiration, 2015, 90(2): 129-135.
10	Zhang SJ, Zhang M, Zhou J, et al. Radial endobronchial ultrasonography with distance measurement through a thin bronchoscope for the diagnosis of malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2018, 7(1): 80-87.
11	房延凤，李王平，顾　兴，等. 超细支气管镜联合EBUS-GS对周围型肺癌诊断效能及影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(4): 406-409.
12	Oki M, Saka H, Ando M, et al. Ultrathin bronchoscopy with multimodal devices for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomized trial[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 192(4): 468-476.
13	Izumo T, Sasada S, Chavez C, et al. The diagnostic value of histology and cytology samples during endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2015, 45(4): 362-366.
14	Xu CH, Yuan Q, Yu LK, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial biopsy with guide-sheath for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(35): 58272-58277.
15	Fielding D, Kurimoto N. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2018, 39(1): 111-123.
16	Zhang SJ, Zhang M, Zhou J, et al. Comparison of radial endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath and with distance by thin bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a prospective randomized crossover trial[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(11): 3112-3118.
17	Asano F, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation for peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Respiration, 2014, 88(5): 430-440.
18	Dhillon SS, Harris K. Bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(Suppl 10): S1047-S1058.
19	Haidong H, Yunye N, Wei Z, et al. Multiple guided technologies based on radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of solitary peripheral pulmonary lesions: a single-center study[J]. J Cancer, 2017, 8(17): 3514-3521.
20	Toba H, Kondo K, Miyoshi T, et al. Fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic resection after computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic metallic coil marking for small peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 44(2): e126-132.
21	Ozgul G, Cetinkaya E, Ozgul MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy with or without radial endobronchial ultrasound for peripheral lung lesions[J]. Endosc Ultrasound, 2016, 5(3): 189-195.
22	Matsumoto Y, Izumo T, Sasada S, et al. Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath under the computed tomography workstation (ziostation) for small peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Clin Respir J, 2017, 11(2): 185-192.
23	Schuhmann M, Bostanci K, Bugalho A, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided cryobiopsies in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a feasibility study[J]. Eur Respir J, 2014, 43(1): 233-239.
24	Kuo CH, Lin SM, Lee KY, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and brushing: a comparative evaluation for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 45(5): 894-898.
25	Kunimasa K, Tachihara M, Tamura D, et al. Diagnostic utility of additional conventional techniques after endobronchial ultrasonography guidance during transbronchial biopsy[J]. Respirology, 2016, 21(6): 1100-1105.
26	Hayama M, Okamoto N, Suzuki H, et al. Radial endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for diagnosis of peripheral cavitary lung lesions: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2016, 16(1): 76-85.
27	Okachi S, Imai N, Imaizumi K, et al. Factors affecting the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in peripheral lung cancer[J]. Intern Med, 2016, 55(13): 1705-1712.
28	Maekura T, Sugimoto C, Tamiya A, et al. Combination of virtual bronchoscopic navigation, endobronchial ultrasound, and rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosing small peripheral pulmonary lesions: a prospective phase Ⅱ study[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(7): 1930-1936.
29	Gupta A, Suri JC, Bhattacharya D, et al. Comparison of diagnostic yield and safety profile of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscopic lung biopsy with computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in evaluation of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Lung India, 2018, 35(1): 9-15.
30	Uchimura K, Yamasaki K, Ishimoto H, et al. Factors associated with diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath for peripheral lung cancer[J]. J UOEH, 2016, 38(1): 17-23.
31	Evison M, Crosbie PA, Morris J, et al. Can computed tomography characteristics predict outcomes in patients undergoing radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of peripheral lung lesions[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2014, 9(9): 1393-1397.

[1]	李慧, 曹敏, 徐庆庆, 黄妹, 李蕤, 苗立云, 肖永龙, 孟凡青, 蔡后荣, 代静泓. 超声支气管镜引导下针吸活检术与常规支气管镜活检术对结节病诊断价值的比较[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2016, 13(02): 144-149.
[2]	曹关义, 李泉, 朱红岩, 邢顺鹏. 脉波轮廓温度稀释连续心排量测量技术在重症急性胰腺炎合并急性呼吸道窘迫综合征患者液体管理中的应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(02): 96-100.
[3]	刘颖, 张业, 颜晶晶, 刘政. 经引导鞘超声支气管镜对肺外周结节的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 794-796.
[4]	黄赞胜, 王爽, 王苹, 张明周, 郭洁汝, 范晔. 超声支气管镜引导下电刀辅助开窗活检钳活检在纵膈疾病诊断中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 592-596.
[5]	顾兴, 颜西刚, 王琰, 周艳敏, 谢永宏, 金发光, 张红军. 全身麻醉下行EBUS-TBNA诊断纵隔病变的临床经验[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 137-140.
[6]	韩茜, 崔江禹, 唐纯丽. 经支气管针吸活检模拟教学方法比较[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 251-255.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscope for transbronchial lung biopsy in diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscope for transbronchial lung biopsy in diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions