切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 164 -168. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2023.02.003

论著

高危肺结节患者认知及焦虑状况调查分析
陈冀1, 邓才霞2, 张厚丽2, 祝冰晶2, 刘攀2, 何建2, 唐春兰2, 周向东2, 罗虎2,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第一附属医院门诊部;400038 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第一附属医院肺结节MDT团队
    2. 400038 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科;400038 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第一附属医院肺结节MDT团队
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-14 出版日期:2023-04-25
  • 通信作者: 罗虎
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科卫联合项目(2020FYYX012); 重庆市卫生适宜技术推广项目(2020jstg016)

Study on the cognitive and anxiety status of patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules

Ji Chen1, Caixia Deng2, Houli Zhang2, Bingjing Zhu2, Pan Liu2, Jian He2, Chunlan Tang2, Xiangdong Zhou2, Hu Luo2,()   

  1. 1. Outpatient Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China; Multidisciplinary Treatment Team for Pulmonary Nodules, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
    2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China; Multidisciplinary Treatment Team for Pulmonary Nodules, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2022-10-14 Published:2023-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Hu Luo
引用本文:

陈冀, 邓才霞, 张厚丽, 祝冰晶, 刘攀, 何建, 唐春兰, 周向东, 罗虎. 高危肺结节患者认知及焦虑状况调查分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 164-168.

Ji Chen, Caixia Deng, Houli Zhang, Bingjing Zhu, Pan Liu, Jian He, Chunlan Tang, Xiangdong Zhou, Hu Luo. Study on the cognitive and anxiety status of patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(02): 164-168.

目的

分析高危肺结节患者的认知、焦虑状况及影响因素。

方法

利用肺结节多学科会诊平台,通过自制的认知调查问卷表和广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)对高危肺结节进行调查分析。

结果

712例符合条件的高危肺结节患者纳入调查。认知调查分析发现,565例(79.35%)患者认同胸部CT为肺结节的主要筛查手段、分别有585例(82.16%)和584例(82.02%)的患者认同长期吸烟与肺癌发生和肺结节良恶性有关;645例(90.59%)的患者选择手术作为高危肺结节的主要治疗手段;585例(82.16%)患者将互联网作为获取肺结节相关知识的主要来源。GAD-7焦虑评分发现:高危肺结节患者普遍存在焦虑状况684例(96.07%),其中轻度焦虑为292例(41.01%),中度焦虑240例(33.71%),重度焦虑152例(21.35%)。对患者的焦虑进行影响因素分析,结果发现,年龄段为41~50岁和51~60岁、女性、结节直径在2~3 cm、磨玻璃结节、有癌症家族史、近1年胸部CT次数≥3次、因肺结节就诊医院≥3家的患者,其GAD-7焦虑评分显著高于其他组患者(P<0.05);结节数量、吸烟情况与GAD-7评分无明显关联。女性、年龄段在51~60岁、结节大小≥2 cm、近1年胸部CT次数≥3次、肺结节就诊次数≥3次是高危肺结节患者出现重度焦虑的危险因素。

结论

高危肺结节患者对肺结节的认知仍存在不足,建议借助于网络平台进行针对性的科普教育;中年、女性、结节直径越大、反复多次就诊的患者更容易出现焦虑,临床上需重点关注,及时引导。

Objective

To understand the cognitive and anxiety status and influencing factors of patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules.

Methods

Using a multidisciplinary consultation platform for pulmonary nodules, a self-administered cognitive questionnaire form and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) were used to investigate and analyze high-risk pulmonary nodules.

Results

A total of 712 eligible patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules were included in this survey study. The cognitive survey analysis revealed that 565 cases(79.35%) of patients agreed that chest CT was the main screening tool for lung nodules, 585 cases(82.16%) and 584 cases(82.02%) of patients agreed that long-term smoking was associated with lung cancer development and benign and malignant lung nodules, respectively, 645 cases(90.59%) of patients chose surgery as the main treatment for high-risk lung nodules, and 585 cases(82.16%) of patients used the Internet as the However, the majority of patients still considered pulmonary nodules to be the main treatment. The GAD-7 anxiety score revealed that patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules were generally anxious 684 cases(96.07%), with mild anxiety 292 cases(41.01%), moderate anxiety 240 cases(33.71%), and severe anxiety 152 cases(21.35%), respectively. Patients′anxiety was analyzed for influencing factors, and it was found that patients in the age groups of 41-50 and 51-60 years, female, nodule diameter of 2-3 cm, ground glass nodules, family history of cancer, ≥3 chest CTs in the last 1 year, and ≥3 hospital visits for pulmonary nodules had significantly higher GAD-7 anxiety scores than patients in other groups (P<0.05); while the number of nodules, smoking status were not significantly associated with GAD-7 scores. The number of nodules and smoking status were not significantly associated with GAD-7 scores, while women, age between 51-60, nodule size ≥2 cm, number of chest CTs≥3 times in the last 1 year, and number of visits for pulmonary nodules ≥3 times were risk factors for severe anxiety in patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules.

Conclusion

Patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules still have more deficiencies in their knowledge of pulmonary nodules, and it is recommended that targeted science education be conducted with the help of online platforms; middle-aged, female, larger nodule diameters, and patients with repeated multiple visits are more likely to have anxiety, which requires focused clinical attention and timely guidance.

表1 高危肺结节患者对肺结节相关知识的认知情况[n(%)]
肺结节相关问题 知晓度选择频率
肺结节是一个影像学概念,并不代表良恶性 101(14.19)
胸部CT是最常用于肺部结节筛查的手段,比胸片等方式更容易发现肺部小结节 565/(79.35)
肺结节是个常见问题,其检出率呈增加趋势 316(44.38)
绝大部分体检发现的肺小结节都是良性的 85(11.90)
大部分肺结节是不会出现临床症状的 126(17.70)
你认为哪些临床特征可能和肺结节的良恶性风险有关?  
年龄 285(40.03)
职业暴露情况(如有毒粉尘、石棉吸入等) 324(45.51)
长期吸烟史(包括二手烟) 585(82.16)
癌症家族史 412(57.87)
肺部疾病史(如既往肺结核、COPD、尘肺等) 487(68.40)
你认为哪些影像学特征和肺结节良恶性判断有关?(可多选)  
肺结节大小 614(86.24)
肺结节密度(如实性、亚实性或混合密度、磨玻璃) 478(67.13)
肺结节的一些特征(如分叶、毛刺等) 512(71.91)
肺结节的生长情况(如随访过程中的增长情况) 329(46.21)
肺癌的高危人群包括哪些方面?(可多选)  
40岁以上的长期吸烟者 584(82.02)
长期接触煤烟、油烟或者二手烟者 526(73.87)
有肺癌或其他癌症家族史的人群 425(59.69)
职业上接触有毒物质(如石棉)或放射线者 354(49.72)
有慢性肺部基础疾病者,如COPD、肺结核等 356(50.00)
利用胸部CT对肺结节进行规律随访是一种很好的管理策略 288 (40.45)
对于高危肺结节,有哪些可选择的治疗手段?(可多选)  
手术 645(90.59)
射频消融 11(1.54)
定向放疗 8(1.12)
药物治疗 356(50.00)
大部分体检发现的肺结节是不需要药物治疗的 128(17.98)
肺结节相关知识的获取途径(可多选)  
电视报刊 102(14.33)
互联网(如百度、微信等) 585(82.16)
医师当面宣教 212(29.78)
社区宣教 88(12.36)
其他 72(10.11)
表2 高危肺结节患者GAD-7评分及重度焦虑影响因素分析
1
Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3):analysis of individual records for 37513025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries[J]. Lancet, 2018: S0140673617333263.
2
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA: A Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
3
Research T, Aberle DR, Berg CD, et al. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design[J]. Radiology, 2011, 258(1): 243-253.
4
周清华,范亚光,王 颖,等. 中国肺部结节分类、诊断与治疗指南(2016年版)[J]. 中国肺癌杂志2016, 19(12): 793-798.
5
范卫杰,张 冬. 影像组学及深度学习在肺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的新理念[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(5): 549-553.
6
娄月妍,吴学玲,范碧君,等. 肺结节患者心理健康状况及影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(6): 729-733.
7
中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组,中国肺癌防治联盟专家组. 肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志2018, 41(10): 9.
8
中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2022版)[J]. 中华医学杂志2022, 102(23): 35.
9
He S, Li H, Cao M, et al. Trends and risk factors of lung cancer in China[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2020, 32(6): 683-694.
10
Li N, Tan F, Chen W, et al, National lung cancer screening programme. One-off low-dose CT for lung cancer screening in China: a multicenter, population-based, prospective cohort study[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 202210(4): 378-391.
11
中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 早期肺癌诊断中国专家共识(2023年版) [J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志2023, 46(1): 1-18.
12
赵俊松,崔 利,何江波,等. 上海22351例无症状体检者低剂量CT肺癌筛查及随访结果初步分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践2019, 18(2): 6.
13
Ather S, Kadir T, Gleeson F. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in pulmonary nodule management: current status and future applications[J]. Clin Radiol, 2020, 75(1): 13-19.
14
Chen L, Gu D, Chen Y, et al. An artificial-intelligence lung imaging analysis system (ALIAS) for population-based nodule computing in CT scans[J]. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2021, 89: 101899.
15
Zhang Y, Jiang B, Zhang L, et al. Lung nodule detectability of artificial intelligence-assisted CT image reading in lung cancer screening[J]. Curr Med Imaging, 2022, 18(3): 327-334.
16
Wang XH, Wang T, Ao M, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of anxiety in patients with unconfirmed pulmonary nodules[J]. Clin Respir J, 2023, doi: 10.1111/crj.13576.
17
Andersson E, Dai YY, Johannesson M, et al. Surveillance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected with CT in a Swedish population-based study (SCAPIS): psychosocial consequences and impact on health-related quality of life-a multicentre prospective cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(9): e048721.
18
Wiener RS, Clark JA, Koppelman E, et al. Patient vs clinician perspectives on communication about results of lung cancer screening: A qualitative study[J]. Chest, 2020, 158(3): 1240-1249.
19
Kassem K, Shapiro M, Gorenstein L, et al. Evaluation of high-risk pulmonary nodules and pathologic correlation in patients enrolled in a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) program[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(4): 1165-1169.
20
王丽娜,韦媛媛,胡华青,等. 肺结节患者焦虑抑郁与Th17/Treg和炎症水平改变的相关性研究[J]. 中国肺癌杂志2020, 23(7): 554-560.
21
田 蓉,苏鸣岗,田 野,等. 影响孤立性肺结节良恶性鉴别的因素分析及恶性可能性预测[J]. 四川大学学报:医学版2012, 43(3): 5.
22
Yang Q, Luo LC, Li FM, et al. Survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation compared with surgery in patients with early-stage primary non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis[J]. Respir Investig, 2022, 60(3): 337-344.
23
Chan MV, Huo YR, Cao C, et al. Survival outcomes for surgical resection versus CT-guided percutaneous ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(7): 5421-5433.
24
Farre N, Belda-Sanchis J, Guarino M, et al. The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Transl Res, 2021, 7(1): 34-48.
25
Syed YA, Stokes W, Rupji M, et al. Surgical outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer at facilities with stereotactic body radiation therapy programs[J]. Chest, 2022, 161(3): 833-844.
26
Esser P, Hartung TJ, Friedrich M, et al. The generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) and the anxiety module of the Hospital and Depression Scale (HADS-A) as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder among cancer patients[J]. Psychooncology, 2018, 27(6): 1509-1516.
27
Baker AM, Holbrook JT, Yohannes AM, et al. Test performance characteristics of the AIR, GAD-7, and HADS-anxiety screening questionnaires for anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2018, 15(8): 926-934.
28
Slatore CG, Golden SE, Ganzini L, et al. Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules. A cohort study[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2015, 12(2): 184-192.
[1] 蒋庆梅, 巫韧, 杨岸, 陈晓艳, 钟庆. 对囊周神经阻滞在股骨粗隆间骨折患者全麻术中的镇痛效果及认知功能影响的分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 204-209.
[2] 梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.
[3] 李大伟, 吴宏飞, 韩鹏, 孙盼盼, 邢红伟. 静脉-吸入复合麻醉与全静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜疝修补术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 458-462.
[4] 林静, 陈芳, 刘小霞. COPD患者认知功能障碍影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 569-571.
[5] 吴新高, 李伟, 马俊, 刘红, 黄平. 癫痫患者定量脑电图功率谱相关参数与认知功能损伤的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 304-308.
[6] 郭翃江, 符雪彩, 朱妍妍, 严之红, 王丽娜, 纪红. 基于影响因素的老年阿尔茨海默病认知功能障碍预测模型构建及电子化认知康复训练的应用价值[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 156-161.
[7] 王姗姗, 徐小汝, 史振仙, 张德杰. 丹参多酚酸联合尤瑞克林治疗急性分水岭脑梗死的疗效及对认知功能、脑血流动力学和血清LPA、ox-LDL、MMP-9水平的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 142-149.
[8] 常文轩, 王婷, 刘伟, 蓝天琦, 彭静, 汪诗瑶, 张晓鹏, 冯晨, 宫雪梅, 朱敏. 脑小血管病所致执行障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 179-182.
[9] 朱莹, 周阿香, 李森, 王旭, 齐光辉, 杨策. "长新冠"诊断基础及其对直升机飞行人员作业效能的影响[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 145-152.
[10] 段园霞, 顾柳娜, 张磊, 周丽婷, 朱海瀛, 杨超, 陈海英, 顾晓青, 高宗尚, 黄蛟灵. 上海市奉贤区基层全科医师对心房颤动的认知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 154-159.
[11] 刘澳, 周菁, 孙永兵, 和俊雅, 林新贝, 乔琦, 李中林, 张建成, 武肖玲, 邹智, 胡扬喜, 肖新广, 吕雪, 李昊, 李永丽. 减重代谢手术后神经影像改变与认知功能评估的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 203-208.
[12] 刘感哲, 艾芬. MiRNA-210通过抑制HIF-1α的表达改善大鼠血管性认知功能障碍[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 489-494.
[13] 孙畅, 赵世刚, 白文婷. 脑卒中后认知障碍与内分泌激素变化的关系[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 471-476.
[14] 王道合, 施媛媛. 8-iso-PGF2α及P选择素在评估脑小血管病患者认知功能中的价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 364-368.
[15] 夏禹, 刘寒, 朱瑞. 阿尔茨海默病及相关认知障碍疾病与早老素2基因相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 290-293.
阅读次数
全文


摘要