切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 257 -259. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2023.02.029

短篇论著

HSP90α在老年恶性胸腔积液中的诊断意义
康慧方1, 孙莉2, 田应选2, 尚文丽2, 刘凌华2, 霍树芬2,()   
  1. 1. 716000 延安,延安大学医学院;710068 西安,陕西省人民医院呼吸与危重症二科
    2. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院呼吸与危重症二科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-07 出版日期:2023-04-25
  • 通信作者: 霍树芬
  • 基金资助:
    科技部主动健康和老龄化科技应对国家重点研发计划课题(SQ2018YFC200066,2018YFC2002100,2018YFC2002103); 陕西省人民医院拔尖人才支持计划项目(2021BJ-22)

HSP90α diagnostic significance in the malignant pleural effusion in elderly

Huifang Kang1, Li Sun2, Yingxuan Tian2   

  • Received:2022-12-07 Published:2023-04-25
引用本文:

康慧方, 孙莉, 田应选, 尚文丽, 刘凌华, 霍树芬. HSP90α在老年恶性胸腔积液中的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 257-259.

Huifang Kang, Li Sun, Yingxuan Tian. HSP90α diagnostic significance in the malignant pleural effusion in elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(02): 257-259.

恶性胸腔积液(malignant pleural effusion, MPE)是恶性肿瘤引起的胸腔积液,原发于胸膜的恶性肿瘤或其他部位恶性肿瘤转移至胸膜引起,最常见于肺癌,其次乳腺癌和淋巴瘤,中位生存期3~12个月[1,2]。诊断胸腔积液良恶性的主要方法有胸腔积液脱落细胞学和组织病理学检查,细胞学检查敏感度相对较低。胸腔镜是一项较为安全的检查方法,一些老年患者基础疾病多,免疫功能减退,对胸腔镜等有创检查耐受性差,微创侵入性较低的诊断方法具有临床意义[3,4,5]。热休克蛋白(HSP90α)是一种新的全癌诊断生物标记物,在多种癌症中高表达[6]。本文对我院收治的67例胸腔积液患者HSP90α和传统肿瘤标志物表达水平进行分析,报道如下。

表1 两组实验室指标比较
表2 两组胸腔积液指标水平
表3 胸腔积液单项及联合检测的诊断价值
1
中国恶性PE诊断与治疗专家共识组.恶性胸腔积液诊断与治疗专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志2014, 53(3): 252-256.
2
曾 灏,田攀文. 恶性胸腔积液的诊断研究进展[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(2): 247-249.
3
Dorry M, Davidson K, Dash R, et al. Pleural effusions associated with squamous cell lung carcinoma have a low diagnostic yield and a poor prognosis[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2021, 10(6): 2500-2508.
4
刘文媛,刘跃建,高凌云. 良恶性胸腔积液的病因及不同诊断方法的研究进展[J]. 实用医院临床杂志2019, 1: 216-218.
5
Lucía Ferreiro, Juan SuárezAntelo, Manuel ÁlvarezDobaño José, et al. Malignant pleural effusion: Diagnosis and management[J]. Canad Respir J, 2020, PMID: 33273991.
6
刘 颖,吴金如,夏熙郑,等. 老年胸腔积液患者54例内科胸腔镜检查和胸膜活检分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2010, 45(6): 1036-1038.
7
Wei Liu JL, Ping Zhang QH, Shi Feng LL, et al. A novel pan-cancer biomarker plasma heat shock protein 90alpha and its diagnosis determinants in clinic[J]. Cancer Science, 2019, 110(9): 2941-2959.
8
杨建伯. 中国人口平均寿命及流行病学意义[J]. 中国地方病学杂志2003, 22(2): 43-46.
9
陈 永,程 莉. 老年胸腔积液病因分析[J]. 现代医药卫生2006, 22(15): 2329-2330.
10
Chantharakhit C, Sujaritvanichpong N. Developing a prediction score for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion: MPE score[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2022, 23(1): 25-31.
11
Shameek Gayen. Malignant pleural effusion: Presentation, diagnosis,and management[J]. Am J Med, 2022, 135(10): 1188-1192.
12
Feng M, Zhu J, Liang L, et al. Diagnostic value of tumor markers for lung adenocarcinoma associated malignant pleural effusion: a validation study and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2017, 22(2): 1-8.
13
Costa Temm, Raghavendra NM, Penido C. Natural heat shock protein 90 inhibitors in cancer and inflammation[J]. Eur J Med Chem, 2020, 189: 112063.
14
Jafari A, Rezaei-tavirani M, Farhadihosseinabadi B, et al. HSP90 and Cochape rones: impact on tumor progression and prospects for molecular-target-ed cancer therapy[J]. Cancer Investigation, 2020, 38(5): 310-328.
15
Yang Q, Zhang P, Wu R, et al. Identifying the best marker combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for lung cancer screening by combining ROC curve and logistic regression analyses: is it feasible?[J]. Dismarkers, 2018, 2018: 2082840.
16
Guo J, Yu J, Song X, et al. Serum CA125, CA199 and CEA combined detection for epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis: A Meta-analysis[J]. Open Med, 2017, 12(1): 131-137.
17
陈阳育,徐莉莉,伍燕兵,等. 血清及胸腔积液中四种肿瘤标志物联合应用对良恶性肿瘤诊断价值的评估[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志2021, 28(3): 212-222.
18
吴学虹,王丽燕,杨丽英. 联合检测血清和胸腔积液中肿瘤标志物对良恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志2018, 25(S1): 80-81.
19
Faria DK, Faria CS, Doi D, et al. Hybrid panel of biomarkers can be useful in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2019, 497(10): 48-53.
20
Chen X, Zhang N, Dong J, et al. Reactive oxygen species modulator 1, a novel protein, combined with carcinoembryonic antigen in differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion[J]. Tumour Biol, 2017, 39(5): 1-8.
21
Braunschweig T, Chung JY, Choi CH, et al. Assessment of a panel of tumor markers for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant effusions by well-based reverse phase protein array[J]. Diagn Pathol, 2015, 10: 53.
22
Ding Q, Sun YB, Zhang JG, et al. Utility and specificity of plasma heat shock protein 90 alpha, CEA, and CA199 as the diagnostic test in colorectal cancer liver metastasis[J]. J Gastr Oncol, 2022, 13(5): 2497-2504.
23
Yuan ZM, Wang LH, Chen C. Analysis of the prognostic, diagnostic and immunological role of HSP90α in malignant tumors[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 963719.
24
Hou Q, Chen S, An Q, et al. Extracellular Hsp90α Promotes Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(14): 7747.
25
Zhou W, Yang Y, Wang Z, et al. Impact of HSP90α,CEA, NSE, SCC, and CYFRA21-1 on lung cancer patients[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 6929971.
26
苏世红,尹永杰,张 玉,等. TAP和HSP90α检测在肺癌恶性胸腔积液诊断及预后评估的价值[J]. 临床肺科杂志2022, 27(7): 1086-1091.
27
Maloney A, Workman P. HSP90 as a new therapeutic target for cancer therapy: the story unfolds[J]. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2002, 2(1): 3-24.
28
Roe SM, Prodromou C, O′Brien R, et al. Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin[J]. J Med Chem, 1999, 42(2): 260-266.
29
Whitesell L, Mimnaugh EG, De Costa B, et al. Inhibition of heat shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994, 91(18): 8324-8328.
30
Marcu MG, Chadli A, Bouhouche I, et al. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist novobiocin interacts with a previously unrecognized ATP-binding domain in the carboxyl terminus of the chaperone[J]. J Biol Chem, 2000, 275(47): 37181-37186.
31
Zhang T, Li Y, Yu Y, et al. Characterization of celastrol to inhibit hsp90 and cdc37 interaction[J]. J Biol Chem, 2009, 284(51): 35381- 35389.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[6] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[9] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[10] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要