切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 406 -408. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2023.03.029

短篇论著

CT纹理特征对肺磨玻璃结节生长倾向的预测意义
邢海东(), 胡满意, 许贺松, 李强   
  1. 100062 北京,北京市普仁医院放射科
    101499 北京,北京怀柔医院放射科
    100071 北京,北京市丰台区中医医院放射科
    100034 北京,北京大学第一医院呼吸内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-06-25
  • 通信作者: 邢海东

Predictive significance of CT texture features on the growth propensity of lung ground glass nodules

Haidong Xing(), Manyi Hu, Hesong Xu   

  • Received:2022-12-27 Published:2023-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Haidong Xing
引用本文:

邢海东, 胡满意, 许贺松, 李强. CT纹理特征对肺磨玻璃结节生长倾向的预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 406-408.

Haidong Xing, Manyi Hu, Hesong Xu. Predictive significance of CT texture features on the growth propensity of lung ground glass nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(03): 406-408.

肺磨玻璃结节(ground-glass nodule, GGN)指薄层计算机断层扫描(thin-section computed tomography, TSCT)呈云雾状密度增加,肺内部小血管与支气管结构不被掩盖的一种小结节[1]。肺结节,分为纯磨玻璃结节(pure ground-glass nodule, PGGN)与部分实性结节(part-solid nodule, PSN)[2]。表现为局部炎症、间质纤维化及出血等组织学类型,为良性疾病;出现长期性GGN提示癌前病变或肺腺癌[3,4]。随着计算机断层扫描(CT)普及,GGN检出率多[5,6]。多数GGN进展缓慢,呈惰性增长。非浸润性腺癌经手术治疗后,5年生存率达100%[7,8]。本文对我院收治的GNN患者102例GGN生长临床特征与放射特征进行比较,建立预测模型,报道如下。

表1 患者GGN增长与无增长临床特征比较[n(%)]
表2 GGN生长多因素Logistic回归分析
1
杨 丽,钱桂生. 肺结节临床精准诊断的新理念[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(1): 1-5.
2
Mazzone PJ, Lam L. Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule:A Review[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(3): 264-273.
3
范子文,谢 冬,姜格宁,等. 肺磨玻璃结节自然生长史研究进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志2019, 26(2): 175-179.
4
Chen K, Bai J, Reuben A, et al. Multiomics analysis reveals distinct immunogenomic features of lung cancer with ground-glass opacity[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021, 204(10): 1180-1192.
5
Li Q, Fan L, Cao ET, et al. Quantitative CT analysis of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodule predicts histological invasiveness[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 89: 67-71.
6
Li CD, Huang ZG, Sun HL, et al. CT-guided preoperative localization of ground glass nodule: comparison between the application of embolization microcoil and the locating needle designed for pulmonary nodules[J]. Br J Radiol, 2021, 94(1123): 20210193.
7
Mirka H, Ferda J, Krakorova G, et al. The use of CT pattern in differentiating non-invasive, minimally invasive and invasive variants of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res, 2021, 41(9): 4479-4482.
8
薛丽敏,李 瀛,强金伟,等. 基于靶扫描和常规扫描CT图像的影像组学模型预测肺磨玻璃结节的2年生长[J]. 复旦学报:医学版2021, 48(6): 739-747.
9
Anyasodor AE, Nwose EU, Bwititi PT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of community diabetes screening: Application of Akaike information criterion in rural communities of Nigeria[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 932631.
10
孟俊祥,柏正尧,计雪伟. 基于CT影像分析的肺部疾病辅助诊断系统应用研究[J]. 中国数字医学2019, 14(3): 92-96.
11
杨兴云,宋立江,王 涛,等. 多层螺旋CT图像后处理技术在肺部结节鉴别诊断中的应用研究[J]. 中国医学装备2019, 16(8): 33-36.
12
潘江峰,邝平定,应明亮,等. 肺部纯磨玻璃结节浸润性肺腺癌与浸润前病变的高分辨靶扫描CT鉴别诊断[J]. 浙江医学2016, 38(11): 826-828.
13
Kobayashi Y, Sakao Y, Deshpande GA, et al. The association between baseline clinical-radiological characteristics and growth of pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity[J]. Lung Cancer, 2014, 83(1): 61-66.
14
尹 柯,伍建林,邱太春. 高分辨率CT征象诊断浸润性肺腺癌的模型建立[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志2019, 27(11): 824-828.
15
Kakinuma R, Muramatsu Y, Kusumoto M, et al. Solitary pure ground-glass nodules 5 mm or smaller: Frequency of growth[J]. Radiology, 2015, 276(3): 873-882.
16
Cho J, Kim ES, Kim SJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of small pulmonary ground-glass nodules stable for 3 years: implications of the proper follow-up period and risk factors for subsequent growth[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2016, 11(9): 1453-1459.
17
Shi Z, Deng J, She Y, et al. Quantitative features can predict further growth of persistent pure ground-glass nodule[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019, 9(2): 283-291.
18
Miyanaga N, Akaza H, Yamakawa M, et al.Tissue elasticity imaging for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a preliminary report[J]. Int J Urol, 2006, 13(12): 1514-1518.
19
Zhang Y, Shen Y, Qiang JW, et al. HRCT features distinguishing pre-invasive from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(9): 2921-2928.
20
Thawani R, McLane M, Beig N, et al. Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: A review for the clinician[J]. Lung Cancer, 2018, 115: 34-41.
21
Chen G, Jiao D, Peng S, et al. Peritumoral abnormalities on dynamic-enhanced CT after brachytherapy for hepatic malignancies: local progression or benign changes?[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(10): 7307-7319.
22
Sun Y, Li C, Jin L, et al. Radiomics for lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules: invasive prediction[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(7): 3650-3659.
23
Zheng H, Zhang H, Wang S, et al. Invasive Prediction of Ground Glass Nodule Based on Clinical Characteristics and Radiomics Feature[J]. Front Genet, 2022, 12: 783391.
24
Fan L, Fang M, Li Z, et al. Radiomics signature: a biomarker for the preoperative discrimination of lung invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as a ground-glass nodule[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(2): 889-897.
25
Sun Q, Huang Y, Wang J, et al. Applying CT texture analysis to determine the prognostic value of subsolid nodules detected during low-dose CT screening[J]. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(1): 59-66.
26
Hu X, Ye W, Li Z, et al. Non-invasive evaluation for benign and malignant subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodules (≤1 cm) based on CT texture analysis[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93(1114): 20190762.
27
Bandara MS, Gurunayaka B, Lakraj G, et al. Ultrasound Based Radiomics Features of Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. Acad Radiol, 2022, 29(2): 229-235.
28
Yaşar S, Voyvoda N, Voyvoda B, et al. Using texture analysis as a predictive factor of subtype, grade and stage of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2020, 45(11): 3821-3830.
29
Yan M, Wang W. A Non-invasive Method to Diagnose Lung Adenocarcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 602.
30
Tao G, Yin L, Shi D, et al. Dependence of radiomic features on pixel size affects the diagnostic performance of radiomic signature for the invasiveness of pulmonary ground-glass nodule[J]. Br J Radiol, 2021, 94(1118): 20200089.
[1] 康亚宁, 付超, 司彩凤, 郭艳飞, 李静, 崔可飞. 不同TI-RADS分类系统对甲状腺结节的诊断效能对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 561-566.
[2] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[3] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[4] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[5] 刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[6] 陈川, 杨太珠, 何泽凤. 肾脏彩色多普勒超声结果对儿童重症医学科急性肾损伤患儿的辅助诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 219-226.
[7] 李雪, 鲁锦, 张弘. 复发性流产孕妇早孕期血栓标志物筛查及干预[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 476-483.
[8] 王锦怡, 鲍珽轶. 血清尿酸及NLRP3炎症小体对妊娠期高血压疾病孕妇并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 663-670.
[9] 赵月, 张宗明, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 朱明文, 邓海, 万柏江, 谢希源, 张李鹏. 老年急性结石性胆囊炎手术时机危急值评判[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 521-524.
[10] 葛卫卫, 李伟, 李荣兴, 成亚会, 李青松. MSCT与HRCT在不同病理类型肺磨玻璃结节中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 572-574.
[11] 叶垚坤, 姜家锁, 叶靖, 张丽莎, 蒋巧会, 丁贵苏, 闵凌峰. 基于CT的影像组学评估自发性气胸患者的预后[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 185-189.
[12] 王康, 陈冬梅, 刘基, 尹婷婷, 陈忠, 史清明. 多层螺旋CT及能谱CT在肺磨玻璃结节中的应用价值[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(03): 361-363.
[13] 方新, 陈山, 臧林. 肺磨玻璃结节CT三维重建精确定位在胸腔镜肺段切除中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 764-766.
[14] 任德标, 周丽娟, 林智刚, 刘威宏. CT放射组学对NSCLC患者抗PD-L1疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 614-616.
[15] 陈志鹏, 张铁凝, 高雷, 曹胜军, 李全. 血栓弹力图在早期烧伤后凝血功能障碍诊断的应用研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 257-261.
阅读次数
全文


摘要