切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 575 -579. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.04.013

论著

分析MPVR技术在诊断肺磨玻璃结节浸润性中的临床意义
熊廷伟1, 陶阳1, 李王佳1, 付彬洁1, 褚志刚1, 吕发金1,()   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-14 出版日期:2024-08-25
  • 通信作者: 吕发金
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项重点项目(CSTC2021jscx-ksbN0030); 重庆市科卫联合医学科研重点项目(2022ZDXM006)

Exploring the clinical value of multiplanar volume rendering technology in diagnosising the invasiveness of pulmonary ground glass nodules

Tingwei Xiong1, Yang Tao1, Wangjia Li1, Binjie Fu1, Zhigang Chu1, Fajin Lv1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2024-01-14 Published:2024-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Fajin Lv
引用本文:

熊廷伟, 陶阳, 李王佳, 付彬洁, 褚志刚, 吕发金. 分析MPVR技术在诊断肺磨玻璃结节浸润性中的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 575-579.

Tingwei Xiong, Yang Tao, Wangjia Li, Binjie Fu, Zhigang Chu, Fajin Lv. Exploring the clinical value of multiplanar volume rendering technology in diagnosising the invasiveness of pulmonary ground glass nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(04): 575-579.

目的

分析多平面容积再现技术(multiplanar volume rendering, MPVR)在肺磨玻璃结节浸润性诊断中的临床意义。

方法

选择2020年1月至2023年5月我院收治因肺磨玻璃结节(ground glass nodule, GGN)接受手术切除患者1032例,其中303例(29.36%),共325枚组织经病理学证实的GGN,包括114枚原位腺癌(adenocarcinoma in situ, AIS)、104枚微浸润性腺癌(minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, MIA)和107枚浸润性腺癌(invasive adenocarcinoma, IAC)。根据MPVR表现将GGN内部表现分为Ⅰ~Ⅴ型、外部形态表现分为Ⅰ~Ⅲ型。微浸润性腺癌及浸润性腺癌定义为浸润性病变(invasive lesions, ILs),根据MPVR上GGN内孤立性结节最大径与GGN三维(three-dimensional, 3D)最大径比值,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)分析鉴别浸润性病变和浸润性腺癌的截断值。

结果

AIS内部表现以Ⅰ型(75.44%)为主;MIA内部表现以Ⅴ型(50.00%)为主;IAC内部表现以Ⅳ型为主(57.01%),三者差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。内部表现为Ⅱ型的GGN,AIS与IAC间具有统计学差异(P<0.001),MIA与AIS、MIA与IAC间无统计学意义(P>0.05);无内部表现为Ⅲ型的GGN,AIS与MIA及IAC间有统计学差异(P<0.001),MIA与IAC间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。AIS外部MPVR表现以Ⅰ型(86.84%)、MIA外部MPVR表现以Ⅱ型(58.65%)、IAC外部MPVR表现以Ⅲ型(68.22%)为主,组间比较有统计学意义(P<0.001)。鉴别ILs和IACs时,MPVR上GGN内孤立结节最大径与GGN3D长径比值的截断值分别为0.5[曲线下面积(AUC):0.816,敏感性:71.93,特异性:85.71,(P<0.001)]和0.508(AUC:0.883,敏感性:87.5,特异性:79.03,P<0.001)。

结论

MPVR技术给序GGN临床诊断带来依据,对GGN浸润性诊断中有重要作用,临床实践具有意义。

Objective

Exploring the clinical significance of Multiplanar volume rendering (MPVR) technology in diagnosising the invasiveness of pulmonary ground glass nodules.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 325 neoplastic GGNs, 114 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 104 minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and 107 invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) in 303 patients between January 2020 and May 2023. The internal performance of GGN were divided into Ⅰ-Ⅴ types, and the external morphology were divided into Ⅰ-Ⅲ types according to the multiplanar volume rendering (MPVR) performance. Define MIA and IAC as invasive lesions(ILs), and based on the ratio of the maximum diameter of solitary nodules in GGN on MPVR to the 3D maximum diameter of GGN, and then the cutoff value for distinguishing invasive lesions and invasive adenocarcinoma were obtained via ROC analysis.

Results

The internal manifestation of AIS, MIA, IAC on MPVR were mainly type Ⅰ, type Ⅴ and type Ⅳ, and statistical significance (P<0.001) were found between the three groups. there also were statistically significant difference between AIS and IAC in type Ⅱ, and between AIS and MIA, IAC in type Ⅲ (each P<0.001 ). The external manifestation of AIS, MIA, IAC on MPVR were mainly type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, and type Ⅲ, and statistical significance (P<0.001) were found between the three groups. For distinguishing invasive lesions and invasive adenocarcinoma, the cutoff value for the ratio of the maximum diameter of solitary nodules in GGN on MPVR to the 3D maximum diameter of GGN was 0.5 (AUC: 0.816, sensitivity: 71.93, specificity: 85.71, P<0.001), and 0.508 (AUC: 0.883, sensitivity: 87.5, specificity: 79.03, P<0.001).

Conclusion

MPVR technology has important role in evaluating the invasiveness of pulmonary ground glass nodules and has guiding significance for clinical practice.

图1 MPVR上GGN内部表现分型。注:Ⅰ型:无结节(图1A);Ⅱ型:孤立结节,结节形态规则(图1B);Ⅲ型:孤立结节,结节形态不规则(图1C);Ⅳ型:孤立结节,结节形态不规则表现更为复杂(图1D);Ⅴ型:散在分布结节(图1E)
图2 MPVR上GGN外部形态分型。注:A、B:Ⅰ型形态规则;C、D:Ⅱ型形态不规则;E:Ⅲ型形态不规则表现更为复杂
表1 GGN内部表现和MPVR分型
表2 GGN外部表现和MPVR分型
表3 MPVR技术GGN最大径与GGN3D长径比值鉴别浸润性病变
表4 MPVR技术GGN最大径与GGN3D长径比值鉴别浸润性腺癌
图3 病理图;注:A、B:原位腺癌(AIS)的组织病理学图片;C、D:微浸润腺癌(MIA)组织病理学图片;E:浸润性腺癌(IAC)的组织病理学图片,(HE染色,×200)
1
李华娟,唐英俊,王赛妮,等. 肺结节临床与CT影像学特征分析及良恶性预测模型构建[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(3): 318-323.
2
Lee JH, Park CM, Lee SM, et al. Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules with solid portions of 5 mm or smaller: Their natural course and predictors of interval growth[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(6): 1529-1537.
3
Hsu WC, Huang PC, Pan KT, et al. Predictors of invasive adenocarcinomas among pure ground-glass nodules less than 2 cm in diameter[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(16): 3945.
4
Borghesi A, Michelini S, Golemi S, et al. What′s new on quantitative CT analysis as a tool to predict growth in persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules? A literature review[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2020, 10(2): 55.
5
Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Beasley MB, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumors: Impact of advances since 2015[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2022, 17(3): 362-387.
6
Qi L, Lu W, Yang L, et al. Qualitative and quantitative imaging features of pulmonary subsolid nodules: Differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and preinvasive lesions[J]. J ThoracDis, 2019, 11: 4835-4846.
7
Behera M, Owonikoko TK, Gal AA, et al. Lung adenocarcinoma staging using the 2011 IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: A pooled analysis of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2016, 17: e57-64.
8
Hammer MM, Hatabu H. Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective[J]. Eur J Radiol Open, 2020, 7: 100267.
9
Qi LL, Wu BT, Tang W, et al. Long-term follow-up of persistent pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules with deep learning-assisted nodule segmentation[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(2): 744-755.
10
Shi L, Zhao J, Peng X, et al. CT-based radiomics for differentiating invasive adenocarcinomas from indolent lung adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules: Asystematic review[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2021144: 109956.
11
Hammer MM, Palazzo LL, Eckel AL, et al. A decision analysis of follow-up and treatment algorithms for nonsolid pulmonary nodules[J]. Radiology, 2019, 290(2): 506-513.
12
Kou J, Gu X, Kang L. Correlation analysis of computed tomography features and pathological types of multifocal ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022, 2022: 7267036.
13
Li X, Zhang W, Yu Y, et al. CT features and quantitative analysis of subsolid nodule lung adenocarcinoma for pathological classification prediction[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 60.
14
Fang W, Zhang G, Yu Y, et al. Identification of pathological subtypes of early lung adenocarcinoma based on artificial intelligence parameters and CT signs[J]. Biosci Rep, 2022, 42(1): BSR20212416.
15
Kou J, Gu X, Kang L. Correlation analysis of computed tomography features and pathological types of multifocal ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Comput math methods med, 2022, 2022: 7267036.
16
Wang H, Weng Q, Hui J, et al. Value of TSCT features for differentiating preinvasive and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodules smaller than 3 cm[J]. Acad radiol, 2020, 27(3): 395-403.
17
Gao J, Qi Q, Li H, et al. Artificial-intelligence-based computed tomography histogram analysis predicting tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as radiological part-solid nodules[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1096453.
18
Lee JH, Kim TH, Lee S, et al. High versus low attenuation thresholds to determine the solid component of ground-glass opacity nodules[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0205490.
19
Li WJ, Lv FJ, Tan YW, et al. Benign and malignant pulmonary part-solid nodules: differentiation via thin-section computed tomography[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(1): 699-710.
20
Lee HW, Jin KN, Lee JK, et al. Long-term follow-up of ground-glass nodules after 5 years of stability[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2019, 14(8): 1370-1377.
21
Gao C, Li J, Wu L, et al. The natural growth of subsolid nodules predicted by quantitative initial CT features: A systematic review[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 318.
22
He S, Chen C, Wang Z, et al. The use of the mean computed-tomography value to predict the invasiveness of ground-glass nodules: A meta-analysis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(2): 677-682.
23
Zhang H, Wang D, Li W, et al. Artificial intelligence system-based histogram analysis of computed tomography features to predict tumor invasiveness of ground-glass nodules[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2023, 13(9): 5783-5795.
[1] 吕衡, 董理聪, 谢海琴, 赵卓非, 刘俐, 孙德胜. 基于CT-超声对照的肝脏局灶性病变超声漏诊状况分析:一项单中心横断面质量控制调查报告[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 712-716.
[2] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[3] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[4] 刘化胜, 郑龙波, 秦琛, 王伟芹, 郑学风, 马金龙, 马正, 王洪霞, 刘磊, 胡继霖. 基于影像学指标构建永久性乙状结肠造口旁疝发病风险预测模型[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 75-82.
[5] 潘忠军, 戎国祥, 丁明, 殷优宏, 张双龙. 非气管插管麻醉下单孔胸腔镜手术对肺结节及血流动力学、炎性指标的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 272-275.
[6] 陆祥, 陈卫荣. 单孔胸腔镜肺段切除术与单孔胸腔镜肺楔形切除术在直径2 cm以下肺磨玻璃结节的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 95-98.
[7] 葛卫卫, 李伟, 李荣兴, 成亚会, 李青松. MSCT与HRCT在不同病理类型肺磨玻璃结节中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 572-574.
[8] 刘思佚, 拉周措毛. 肺尘埃沉着的影像学及支气管镜表现分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 412-414.
[9] 邹健, 从建华, 田玥, 黄旻坤, 孙婷, 王志勤, 沈俪骅, 高臻晖. 肺磨玻璃结节与幽门螺杆菌感染的相关性研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 258-262.
[10] 贾绘, 倪薇, 包成明, 褚爱萍, 谷存谦, 郭坤, 常新. CT和彩色多普勒超声对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的临床诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 239-243.
[11] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 948-954.
[12] 倪管崟, 缪小赟, 丁家安, 田鹏程, 倪才方. 锥形束计算机断层扫描在肝癌介入诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 256-260.
[13] 王靖玺, 赵丽, 吕滨. 人工智能在肺栓塞CT检查中的临床研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 26-31.
[14] 王宇, 张泽锴, 吴明胜, 王高祥, 孙效辉, 王君, 徐美青, 李田, 徐世斌, 解明然. 术后病理诊断为良性肺结节323例患者临床特征分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 167-174.
[15] 刘云泽, 李宬润, 任红, 郭俊唐, 刘阳. CT影像组学在肺结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 120-129.
阅读次数
全文


摘要