切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 762 -767. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2025.05.018

论著

布地格福吸入气雾剂联合可加温湿化的经鼻氧疗与无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床分析
葛敏1, 朱祥1, 晁东鹏1, 王军1,(), 郭依丹1, 王蓓娟1, 吉泽1, 王增成2   
  1. 1215000 苏州,上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院呼吸与危重症医学科
    2215000 苏州,上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-16 出版日期:2025-10-25
  • 通信作者: 王军

Clinical analysis of the efficacy of budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol combined with HFNC and NIPPV in the treatment of patients with COPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure

Min Ge1, Xiang Zhu1, Dongpeng Chao1, Jun Wang1,(), Yidan Guo1, Beijuan Wang1, Ze Ji1, Zengcheng Wang2   

  1. 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou 215000, China
    2Department of Pediatrics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou 21500, China
  • Received:2025-04-16 Published:2025-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Jun Wang
引用本文:

葛敏, 朱祥, 晁东鹏, 王军, 郭依丹, 王蓓娟, 吉泽, 王增成. 布地格福吸入气雾剂联合可加温湿化的经鼻氧疗与无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 762-767.

Min Ge, Xiang Zhu, Dongpeng Chao, Jun Wang, Yidan Guo, Beijuan Wang, Ze Ji, Zengcheng Wang. Clinical analysis of the efficacy of budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol combined with HFNC and NIPPV in the treatment of patients with COPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 18(05): 762-767.

目的

比较布地格福吸入气雾剂分别联合经鼻氧疗(high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, HFNC)与无创正压通气(non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, NIPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, COPD)并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者。

方法

纳入我院收治的COPD并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者96例为对象,根据治疗方案不同,分为对照组45例与观察组51例,对照组给予布地格福吸入气雾剂联合NIPPV治疗,观察组给予布地格福吸入气雾剂联合HFNC治疗,两组连续治疗7~10 d。比较临床疗效,呼吸频率(respiratory rate, RR)、心率(heart rate, HR)、动脉血气分析参数:计算氧合指数(oxygenation index, PaO2/FiO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PaCO2)、动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of arterial oxygen, PaO2)、pH,电子计算机断层肺扫描(computed tomography, CT)及肺功能指标[呼气峰流速(peak expiratory flow, PEF)、第1秒用力呼吸容积/用力肺活量(forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC)、最大吸气末容积(maximal inspiratory volume, MIV)、最大呼气末容积(maximal expiratory volume, MEV)],氧化应激与炎症指标[β2-微球蛋白(β2-microglobulin, β2-MG)、胆碱酯酶(cholinesterase, CHE)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, sICAM-1)、脂质过氧化物(lipid peroxidation, LPO)],呼吸情况、治疗舒适度及不良反应[COPD评估测试(COPD assessment test, CAT)、Kolcaba舒适状况量表(general comfort questionnaire, GCQ)评分、改良呼吸困难指数评分(modified medical research council, mMRC)]。

结果

观察组肺功能改善45例(88.24%)高于对照组34例(75.56%)(P<0.05);观察组RR(18.43±1.85)次/min、HR(82.89±3.24)次/min、PaCO2(49.83±3.14)mmHg、LPO(4.56±1.31)nmol/L、sICAM-1(185.45±19.77)ng/ml、β2-MG水平(2.19±0.48)mg/L、MIV(4 287.51±314.27)、MEV(2 123.06±274.33)及CAT(13.74±2.18)分、mMRC评分(1.57±0.33)分低于对照组(19.54±2.02)次/min、(84.57±3.36)次/min、(51.35±3.43)mmHg、(5.35±1.47)nmol/L、(196.52±22.37)ng/ml、(2.19±0.48)mg/L、(4 431.24±329.45)、(2 269.62±285.47)、(15.13±2.32)分、(1.76±0.38)分(P<0.05);观察组PaO2/FiO2(304.54±22.71)mmHg、PaO2(66.11±3.56)mmHg、PEF(356.42±25.68)L/min、pH(7.37±0.08)、FEV1/FVC值(70.07±5.22)%、CHE(3876.29±455.38)U/L、GCQ评分(85.07±4.12)高于对照组的(292.36±24.42)mmHg、(64.25±3.43)mmHg、(343.26±24.73)L/min、(7.33±0.09)、(67.76±4.84)%、(3 658.17±423.35)U/L、(82.75±4.34)分(P<0.05)。

结论

布地格福联合HFNC对COPD伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭有疗效,可降低患者体内氧化应激与炎症反应,改善生理、呼吸功能、通气状况及舒适度具有意义。

Objective

To compare the effects of budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol combined with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) respectively in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure.

Methods

A total of 96 patients with COPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure admitted to our hospital were collected as the research objects. They were divided into a control group with 45 cases and an observation group with 51 cases. The control group was treated with budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol combined with NIPPV, and the observation group was treated with budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol combined with HFNC. Both groups were continuously treated for 7 to 10 days. The clinical efficacy, arterial blood gas analysis [respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), potential of hydrogen (pH)], computed tomography (CT) of the lungs and pulmonary function indexes [peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), maximal inspiratory volume (MIV), maximal expiratory volume (MEV)], oxidative stress and inflammatory indexes [β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), cholinesterase (CHE), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), lipid peroxidation (LPO)], respiratory status, treatment comfort level and adverse reactions [COPD assessment test (CAT), Kolcaba general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) score, modified medical research council (mMRC) score] were compared between the two groups.

Results

In the observation group, 32 cases were effective and 15 cases were improved, and the improvement rate of pulmonary function was 45 cases(88.24%), which was higher than that in the control group (24 cases were effective and 11 cases were improved, and the improvement rate of pulmonary function was 34 cases(75.56%). The levels of RR, HR, PaCO2, LPO, sICAM-1, β2-MG, MIV, MEV, CAT and mMRC scores in the observation group were (18.43±1.85) times/min, (82.89±3.24) times/min, (49.83±3.14) mmHg, (4.56±1.31) nmol/L, (185.45±19.77) ng/ml, (2.19±0.48) mg/L, (4287.51±314.27), (2123.06±274.33), (13.74±2.18) points and (1.57±0.33) points respectively, which were lower than those in the control group [(19.54±2.02) times/min, (84.57±3.36) times/min, (51.35±3.43) mmHg, (5.35±1.47) nmol/L, (196.52±22.37) ng/ml, (2.19±0.48) mg/L, (4 431.24±329.45), (2 269.62±285.47), (15.13±2.32) points and (1.76±0.38) points] (P<0.05). The levels of PaO2/FiO2, PaO2, PEF, pH, FEV1/FVC value, CHE level and GCQ score in the observation group were (304.54±22.71) mmHg, (66.11±3.56) mmHg, (356.42±25.68) L/min, (7.37±0.08), (70.07±5.22)%, (3 876.29±455.38) U/L and (85.07±4.12) points respectively, which were higher than those in the control group (292.36±24.42) mmHg, (64.25±3.43) mmHg, (343.26±24.73) L/min, (7.33±0.09), (67.76±4.84)%, (3 658.17±423.35) U/L and (82.75±4.34) points (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Budesonide, glycopyrronium bromide and formoterol fumarate combined with HFNC has an obvious curative effect on COPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure, which can reduce the oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction in patients, and improve their physiological function, respiratory function, ventilation status and comfort level.

表1 两组COPD并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者动脉血气分析(±s)
表2 两组患者COPD并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭氧化应激与炎症指标(±s)
表3 两组COPD患者并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者肺CT及肺功能指标(±s)
表4 两组COPD患者并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭呼吸情况、治疗舒适度[分,(±s)]
1
杨敏,吴文艳. 少阴论治慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的研究——评《伤寒论》[J]. 世界中医药2023, 18(9): 1356.
2
李强,赵凤德,王瑞瑞,等. 布地格福联合白葡奈氏菌片维持治疗中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的临床观察[J]. 中国药房2024, 35(19): 2391-2396.
3
杨明福,王永兴. HFNC与NPPV在AECOPD伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭中的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(6): 804-808.
4
刘易其,李冬琼,陈明菊,等. 经鼻高流量湿化氧疗与无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者疗效的研究[J]. 西南医科大学学报2020, 43(4): 349-353.
5
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病工作委员会. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2021年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志2021, 44(3): 170-205.
6
王辰,高占成. 内科学呼吸与危重症医学分册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016: 265-270.
7
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志2013, 36(4): 255-264.
8
孟现玲,何玉廷,毛若琳,等. 圣乔治呼吸问卷、CAT及mMRC评分在慢性阻塞性肺病中的应用[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2022, 49(6): 862-868, 876.
9
Fu X, Wang L, Wang G, et al. Delirium in elderly patients with COPD combined with respiratory failure undergoing mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2022, 22(1): 266.
10
牛家龙,李可立,石晓燕. 无创正压通气联合常规治疗在COPD并发呼吸衰竭中的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(2): 249-251.
11
Xu X, Ma D, Zhou F. Efficacy of naloxone combined with noninvasive ventilator in the treatment of COPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure[J]. Minerva Surg, 2022, 77(6): 634-636.
12
连玉菲,刘洪涛,邱学佳,等. 卫生技术评估在布地格福与氟替美维快速遴选中的应用与实践[J]. 中国医院药学杂志2022, 42(1): 74-80, 92.
13
景国强,吕姗,刘凯,等. 《成人危重症患者的雾化吸入治疗:关于各种呼吸支持模式下雾化给药策略的共识》要点解读[J]. 中国实用内科杂志2024, 44(9): 740-744, 751.
14
宣瑞萍,刘笑琴,王平,等. 无创正压通气与经鼻高流量氧疗治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(3): 346-348.
15
邱璇,黄海屏,韩晓瑜,等. 化痰理肺定喘汤治疗痰热壅肺型慢阻肺的随机、对照研究[J/OL]. 辽宁中医杂志2024, 1-12. 2024-06-07 [2025-03-21].

URL    
16
Zhang QJ, Huang JC, Chen J, et al. Peak expiratory flow is a reliably household pulmonary function parameter correlates with disease severity and survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. BMC Neurol, 2022, 22(1): 105.
17
林幽草,施晓瑜,黄芳,等. CT定量参数联合NLR与COPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者肺功能的相关性及预测预后的价值[J]. 放射学实践2024, 39(8): 1040-1044.
18
鲁梅珊,王新博,张宏民,等. 阶梯化气道管理策略对重症超高龄患者医院获得性肺炎的影响[J]. 协和医学杂志2024, 15(3): 567-572.
19
张国英,王静,王传霞,等. 经鼻高流量湿化氧疗对急性心源性肺水肿患者的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58(1): 77-80, 86.
20
Zhang L, Wang Y, Ye Y, et al. Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula with conventional oxygen therapy in patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2023, 18: 895-906.
21
Xu J, Zeng Q, Li S, et al. Inflammation mechanism and research progress of COPD[J/OL]. Front Immunol, 2024, 15: 1404615. 2024-08-09[2025-03-21]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404615.
22
王海霞. 清热解毒口服液治疗急性上呼吸道感染的疗效和对患者睡眠质量的影响[J]. 世界睡眠医学杂志2023, 10(1): 39-41, 44.
23
俞昌赫,甘甜,宋红磊. N-乙酰半胱氨酸联合硫酸特布他林片辅助常规治疗老年COPD并呼吸衰竭对功能康复及β2-MG、CHE血清水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志2022, 42(6): 1385-1389.
[1] 高瞻, 唐莎莎, 秦蘅, 王关嵩, 张雯. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺癌的临床特征及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 685-690.
[2] 周滇妹, 字楷, 文富强. 中性粒细胞-白蛋白比值对慢性阻塞性肺疾病危重患者全因死亡风险的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 702-707.
[3] 常亮, 王瀚宇, 徐阳, 王建龙, 王宝, 郑国强, 郝巍山, 李小燕. 经鼻高流量氧疗与无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并低氧血症的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 737-741.
[4] 同娟, 乔燕, 田丹, 高萌, 毛书祥, 杨洋. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴心力衰竭患者继发肺部感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 516-520.
[5] 余辉, 王双兰, 吴庆能, 杨昌其, 彭峰扬, 郭灯亮, 张艺, 崔丽, 吴佳佳. 血清骨保护素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病骨丢失和骨质疏松诊断的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 546-551.
[6] 丁增巴姆, 杨轲, 帅维正, 陈婷, 李盼盼, 马静, 宋韦, 王萍, 王倩, 刘欢. 呼吸训练仪对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能及依从性的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 575-579.
[7] 汪锐, 陈自武, 杨朴强, 田静, 陈莹, 林成, 汪伟. 基于血清标志物机器学习模型对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期机械通气风险的预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 615-619.
[8] 师董芳, 吕红, 陆兵, 张念志, 周宝银, 苗伟. 益气健脾化痰汤对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者改善肺功能的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 643-646.
[9] 陈欧丽, 王桢黎. 新型三联治疗药物在COPD中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 650-653.
[10] 孙晓容, 钟瑶, 张雯, 刘佳铭, 叶东樊. 肺癌免疫治疗并发脊髓炎救治成功一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 657-659.
[11] 王丹, 王昌锋, 王丽, 綦彬, 叶媛媛, 范浩. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者认知功能减退与睡眠呼吸暂停程度临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 390-394.
[12] 吴春兴, 廖庆, 杨海玲, 袁海娟, 彭小林, 张峰, 范日升, 谢良骏. 低剂量SPECT/CT 肺灌注显像诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病并发肺栓塞的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 350-354.
[13] 沈月秋, 曹梦琳, 许梅杰, 吴敏丹, 吴凯怡, 陆琳娟. 基于可解释机器学习预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重风险研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 380-384.
[14] 宋春雪, 王亮亮, 袁玺, 徐庚辰, 刘柳, 马银娟, 丁琦, 魏霞. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在不同血嗜酸性粒细胞水平慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者中的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 416-422.
[15] 尤宁, 秦卫, 徐斌, 彭一莲, 杨小玉. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病并发重症社区获得性肺炎预后风险预测[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 479-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?