切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 212 -220. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.02.005

论著

先天免疫-气细胞型与增殖型肺微血管内皮细胞在急性肺损伤气血屏障维持中的时序性作用
尤恒1,2, 王冉1, 李权1, 李嘉玉1, 王南博1, 王创业1, 徐智1,()   
  1. 1400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科
    2730030 兰州,中国人民解放军西部战区疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-11 出版日期:2026-04-25
  • 通信作者: 徐智
  • 基金资助:
    重庆英才项目(CQYC20220303525); 新桥医院青年博士孵化项目(2024YQB057)

Sequential roles of innate immune aerocytes and proliferative capillary in maintaining the alveolar-capillary barrier during acute lung injury

Heng You1,2, Ran Wang1, Quan Li1, Jiayu Li1, Nanbo Wang1, Chuangye Wang1, Zhi Xu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400037, China
    2The Disease Prevention and Control Center of the Western Theater Command of the People′s Liberation Army of China, Gansu, 730030, China
  • Received:2026-02-11 Published:2026-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhi Xu
引用本文:

尤恒, 王冉, 李权, 李嘉玉, 王南博, 王创业, 徐智. 先天免疫-气细胞型与增殖型肺微血管内皮细胞在急性肺损伤气血屏障维持中的时序性作用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 212-220.

Heng You, Ran Wang, Quan Li, Jiayu Li, Nanbo Wang, Chuangye Wang, Zhi Xu. Sequential roles of innate immune aerocytes and proliferative capillary in maintaining the alveolar-capillary barrier during acute lung injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(02): 212-220.

目的

通过分析单细胞测序数据(single-cell RNA sequencing, scRNA-seq),构建急性肺损伤(acute lung injury, ALI)中肺微血管内皮细胞(pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, PMVECs)的单细胞动态变化图谱,解析损伤进程中细胞异质性及通讯特征。

方法

从基因表达综合数据库(gene expression omnibus, GEO)获取单细胞RNA测序数据集(GSE148499)。利用Seurat软件包进行质量控制、降维聚类和细胞注释。通过基因本体(gene ontology, GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, KEGG)进行差异基因富集分析。采用Monocle3包和CellChat包分别进行拟时序轨迹推断和细胞间通讯分析。利用GSE207651数据集及体外细胞实验进行验证。

结果

PMVECs共鉴定出5种功能亚群,其中先天免疫-气细胞型微血管内皮细胞(innate immune aerocytes, IIAerocytes)和增殖型微血管内皮细胞(proliferative capillary, PCap)是关键调控亚群。ALI早期(6 h~24 h),高表达Car4、Prx、Sox9和Ptgse的IIAerocytes迅速扩增,第1天达峰值(细胞占比13.4%)。该亚群共鉴定出338个差异基因(adj. P<0.05, |log2FC|>1),显著富集于先天免疫激活与病原体应答通路,功能上可通过ESAM信号增强内皮间连接,调控炎症反应与血管通透性。ALI修复期(3 d),高表达Gpihbp1、Tm4sf1、Cdk1、E2f1和Cdk4的PCap扩增至细胞占比32.7%。该亚群共鉴定出441个差异表达基因(adj. P<0.05, |log2FC|>1),显著富集于细胞周期与DNA修复。拟时序分析显示IIAerocytes源自Aerocytes的分化轨迹,PCap起源于GCap。脓毒症模型中同样鉴定出类似IIAerocytes亚群(高表达Car4、Prx、Ltbp2及Higd1b),功能集中于趋化因子信号、白细胞迁移调控及中性粒细胞募集。体外脂多糖刺激实验中,人PMVECs的Cdk4蛋白表达在刺激后第1天达峰值(P<0.0001),E2f1在第2天达峰值(P<0.0001)。细胞免疫荧光染色结果与蛋白印迹分析趋势高度一致,Cdk4和E2f1细胞内荧光强度分别于刺激后第1天、第2天达到峰值(P<0.0001),与PCap增殖标志物的时序表达特征相符。

结论

基于scRNA-seq揭示了ALI下PMVECs功能特征由促炎向促血管生成转换,为ALI病理机制解析及靶向干预提供新见解。

Objective

To construct a single-cell dynamic atlas of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVECs) in acute lung injury (ALI) by analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, and to decipher cellular heterogeneity and communication characteristics during the injury progression.

Methods

The single-cell RNA sequencing dataset (GSE148499) was retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Quality control, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and cell annotation were performed using the Seurat package. Differential gene enrichment analysis was conducted through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Pseudotemporal trajectory inference and intercellular communication analysis were carried out using the Monocle3 and CellChat packages, respectively. Validation was performed using the GSE207651 dataset and in vitro cellular experiments.

Results

PMVECs were classified into five functional subpopulations, among which innate immune aerocytes (IIAerocytes) and proliferative capillary(PCap) were identified as key regulatory subpopulations. During the early phase of ALI (6 h~24 h), IIAerocytes highly expressing Car4, Prx, Sox9, and Ptgse rapidly expanded, reaching peak abundance on day 1 (13.4% of total cells). This subpopulation exhibited 338 differentially expressed genes (adj. P<0.05, |log2FC|>1), significantly enriched in pathways associated with innate immune activation and pathogen response. Functionally, IIAerocytes may enhance endothelial junctions through ESAM signaling, thereby regulating inflammatory responses and vascular permeability. Entering the repair phase of ALI (3 d), PCap highly expressing Gpihbp1, Tm4sf1, Cdk1, E2f1, and Cdk4 dramatically expanded to 32.7% of total cells. This subpopulation exhibited 441 differentially expressed genes (adj. P<0.05, |log2FC|>1), significantly enriched in cell cycle and DNA repair pathways. Pseudotime analysis revealed that IIAerocytes originated from the differentiation trajectory of Aerocytes, whereas PCap derived from GCap. In a sepsis model, a similar IIAerocyte subpopulation (highly expressing Car4, Prx, Ltbp2, and Higd1b) was also identified; however, its functions were more concentrated on chemokine signaling, leukocyte migration regulation, and neutrophil recruitment. In vitro LPS stimulation experiments demonstrated that Cdk4 protein expression in human PMVECs peaked on day 1 post-stimulation (P<0.0001), while E2f1 peaked on day 2 (P<0.0001). Immunofluorescence staining results were highly consistent with Western blot analysis trends, with intracellular fluorescence intensities of Cdk4 and E2f1 reaching peaks on day 1 and day 2 post-stimulation, respectively (P<0.0001), consistent with the temporal expression characteristics of PCap proliferative markers.

Conclusions

Based on scRNA-seq, this study reveals that PMVECs undergo a functional transition from pro-inflammatory to pro-angiogenic phenotypes during ALI, providing novel insights into the pathological mechanisms and targeted therapeutic interventions for ALI.

图1 肺内皮细胞scRNA-seq图谱构建及差异基因GO及KEGG富集分析。图A为PMVECs的无监督聚类、细胞簇注释;图B为不同实验分组细胞组成成分比例;图C为IIAerocytes差异基因的GO及KEGG富集结果;图D为PCap差异基因的GO及KEGG富集结果注:scRNA-seq为单细胞RNA测序;PMVECs为肺微血管内皮细胞;UMAP为统一流形近似投影;Aerocytes为气细胞型;IICap为先天免疫型微血管内皮细胞;GCap为普通型微血管内皮细胞;IIAerocytes为先天免疫-气细胞型微血管内皮细胞;PCap为增殖型微血管内皮细胞;Sample为样本;CellName为细胞名称;GO为基因本体论;KEGG为京都基因与基因组百科全书;Baseline为基线组;LPS-6 h为脂多糖刺激6小时组;LPS-1 d为脂多糖刺激1天组;LPS-2 d为脂多糖刺激2天组;LPS-3 d为脂多糖刺激3天组;LPS-5 d为脂多糖刺激5天组;LPS-7 d为脂多糖刺激7天组;Ratio为比例;GeneRatio为基因比例;p.adjust为调整后p值;Count为数量;BP为生物学过程;CC为细胞组分;MF为分子功能
图2 LPS诱导ALI中IIAerocytes与PCap细胞轨迹动态及细胞间通讯网络分析。图A为LPS暴露第1天IIAerocytes的单细胞拟时序轨迹重建;图B为LPS暴露第3天PCap的单细胞拟时序轨迹重建;图C为细胞通讯网络相互作用数量及多信号受配体贡献排名前10的可视化图;图D为ESAM信号通路在不同细胞中的通讯情况注:UMAP为统一流形近似投影;Aerocytes为气细胞型;IICap为先天免疫型微血管内皮细胞;GCap为普通型微血管内皮细胞;IIAerocytes为先天免疫-气细胞型微血管内皮细胞;PCap为增殖型微血管内皮细胞;pseudotime为拟时序;Number of interactions为相互作用数量;Contribution of each L-R pair为每对左-右配对的贡献度;Relatve contribution为相对贡献度;ESAM signaling network为ESAM信号网络;Sources(Sender)为信号来源(发送信号的细胞群);Communication Prob为细胞通讯概率
图3 CLP公共数据与体外功能实验验证。图A为PMVECs的无监督聚类、细胞簇注释;图B为IIAerocytes差异基因的GO富集结果;图C为LPS刺激各时间点人微血管内皮细胞Cdk4和E2f1蛋白表达情况;图D为LPS刺激各时间点人PMVECs内Cdk4、E2f1荧光强度定量注:CLP为盲肠结扎穿孔术;PMVECs为肺微血管内皮细胞;Aerocytes为气细胞型;IICap为先天免疫型微血管内皮细胞;GCap为普通型微血管内皮细胞;IIAerocytes为先天免疫-气细胞型微血管内皮细胞;PCap为增殖型微血管内皮细胞;GO为基因本体论;NC为基线对照组;LPS-6 h为脂多糖刺激6小时组;LPS-1 d为脂多糖刺激1天组;LPS-2 d为脂多糖刺激2天组;LPS-3 d为脂多糖刺激3天组;LPS-5 d为脂多糖刺激5天组;LPS-7 d为脂多糖刺激7天组;GeneRatio为基因比例;p.adjust为调整后P值;Count为数量;BP为生物学过程;CC为细胞组分;MF为分子功能;LPS为脂多糖;DAPI为4′,6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚荧光染料;Merge为合并;β-Tubulin为β-微管蛋白;GAPDH为甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶;KDa为千道尔顿;Relative Cdk4 protein expression为相对Cdk4蛋白表达水平;Relative E2f1 protein expression为相对E2f1蛋白表达水平;Mean Fluorescence Intensity of Cdk4为Cdk4的平均荧光强度;Mean Fluorescence Intensity of E2f1为E2f1的平均荧光强度;数据以均值±标准差表示(n>3),ns,无统计学意义;*,P<0.05;**,P<0.01;***,P<0.001;****,P<0.0001
1
Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, Bozza FA, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in brazilian intensive care units (the sepsis PREvalence assessment database, SPREAD): an observational study[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2017, 17(11): 1180-1189.
2
Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2019, 5(1): 18.
3
Matthay MA, Zemans RL. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathogenesis and treatment[J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2011, 6: 147-163.
4
Meyer NJ, Gattinoni L, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10300): 622-637.
5
Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. The american-european consensus conference on ARDS. definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994, 149(3 Pt 1): 818-824.
6
Baykara N, Akalın H, Arslantaʂ MK, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study[J]. Crit Care, 2018, 22(1): 93.
7
Tunstead C, Volkova E, Dunbar H, et al. The ARDS microenvironment enhances MSC-induced repair via VEGF in experimental acute lung inflammation[J]. Mol Ther, 2024, 32(10): 3422-3432.
8
Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: Advances in diagnosis and treatment[J]. Jama, 2018, 319(7): 698-710.
9
Ouyang H, Wang Y, Wu J, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells barrier dysfunction induced by LPS: The roles of ceramides and the Txnip/NLRP3 inflammasome[J]. Microvasc Res, 2023, 147: 104491.
10
Milling S. Sophisticated specificity in the innate immune response[J]. Immunology, 2019, 158(2): 61-62.
11
张梦薇,李玉英. 间充质干细胞治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:希望和挑战[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(4): 589-592.
12
赵咏梅,王瑞,李新宇,等. ANGPTL4对LPS诱导的人肺微血管内皮细胞损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(2): 192-195.
13
Zhang L, Gao S, White Z, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of lung endothelial cells identifies dynamic inflammatory and regenerative subpopulations[J]. JCI Insight, 2022, 7(11): e158079.
14
Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2016, 42(12): 1980-1989.
15
Olaniru OE, Kadolsky U, Kannambath S, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic and spatial landscapes of the developing human pancreas[J]. Cell Metab, 2023, 35(1): 184-199.
16
Schupp JC, Adams TS, Cosme C, et al. Integrated single-cell atlas of endothelial cells of the human lung[J]. Circulation, 2021, 144(4): 286-302.
17
Gillich A, Zhang F, Farmer CG, et al. Capillary cell-type specialization in the alveolus[J]. Nature, 2020, 586(7831): 785-789.
18
Xie J, Wang H, Kang Y, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A national cross-sectional survey[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(3): e209-e218.
19
Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition[J]. Jama, 2012, 307(23): 2526-2533.
20
Gorman EA, O′kane CM, Mcauley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management[J]. Lancet, 2022, 400(10358): 1157-1170.
21
Zhou Y, Yang K, Zhang Z, et al. The HIF2α-dependent upregulation of SETDB1 facilitates hypoxia-induced functional and phenotypical changes of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells[J]. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2025, 328(1): C40-C55.
22
Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman R B, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(16): 1671-1684.
23
Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, et al. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2015, 33(5): 495-502.
24
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, et al. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2018, 36(5): 411-420.
25
Heumos L, Schaar A C, Lance C, et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2023, 24(8): 550-572.
26
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression[J]. Genes Dev, 1999, 13(12): 1501-1512.
27
Li Q, Zhu Z, Wang L, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals vascular endothelial cell heterogeneity in human skin[J]. Theranostics, 2021, 11(13): 6461-76.
28
Lee JY, Mcmurtry SA, Stevens T. Single cell cloning generates lung endothelial colonies with conserved growth, angiogenic, and bioenergetic characteristics[J]. Pulm Circ, 2017, 7(4): 777-792.
29
Niethamer TK, Stabler CT, Leach JP, et al. Defining the role of pulmonary endothelial cell heterogeneity in the response to acute lung injury[J]. Elife, 2020, 9: e53072.
30
Hirata K, Ishida T, Penta K, et al. Cloning of an immunoglobulin family adhesion molecule selectively expressed by endothelial cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(19): 16223-16231.
31
Nasdala I, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Wolburg H, et al. A transmembrane tight junction protein selectively expressed on endothelial cells and platelets[J]. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277(18): 16294-16303.
[1] 金烨莹, 王艺璇, 杨瑞. 基于单细胞RNA测序的乳腺癌肿瘤相关巨噬细胞亚群鉴定与临床预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 339-347.
[2] 何林霞, 相阳, 刘心如, 郑兴锋. 巨噬细胞代谢重编程在脓毒症急性肺损伤中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 69-74.
[3] 张晓波, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 王宏宇. 间充质干细胞外泌体改善急性肺损伤机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(01): 81-85.
[4] 贾艳慧, 原毅轩, 官浩, 胡大海. 清除衰老细胞在减轻脓毒症小鼠急性肺损伤中的作用机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(01): 55-60.
[5] 郭瑞铭, 邱伟, 房付春. 单细胞RNA测序技术的发展及其在牙周炎研究中的应用与展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 75-83.
[6] 吴秀琳, 郭亮, 蔡俊, 何志强, 王悦, 杨天仪, 唐敏, 李明霞, 杨智勇, 易斌, 熊玮, 廖江荣, 吴学玲. PALM3对铜绿假单胞菌致血管内皮细胞损伤作用的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 679-684.
[7] 谭宜, 许新才, 万秋风, 曹博威, 李春兴, 郭杨超. 麦冬皂苷D对急性肺损伤和肠黏膜屏障损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 527-533.
[8] 赵才林, 向青, 钱航, 施雯, 邱凌霄, 王斌. 基于生物信息学解析急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征铁死亡枢纽基因及其与免疫分型的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 503-509.
[9] 杨春, 游洋伟, 周宇, 林泽超, 刘亮, 袁堃. 白细胞介素-10 调节辅助性T 细胞17/调节性T 细胞对小鼠输血相关急性肺损伤的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 355-361.
[10] 王鹏森, 吴慧锋, 温建芳, 韦阳, 董龙浩, 刘博强, 李占, 石春锋, 雷晓栋, 吴雄雄. 脓毒症并发急性肺损伤血清miR-146a 的表达及与预后相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 241-245.
[11] 宗晓龙, 林源希, 张天翼, 刘雅茹, 李端阳, 李真玉. 紫檀芪通过抑制炎症反应和NETs 形成对减轻脓毒症小鼠急性肺损伤的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 29-35.
[12] 张敏龙, 杨翠平, 王博, 崔云杰, 金发光. MiR-200b-3p 通过抑制HIF-1α 表达减轻海水吸入诱导的肺水肿作用及机制[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 696-700.
[13] 姜露, 周菊, 毛杨, 代黔. 单细胞和bulk RNA测序的综合分析预测肺鳞状细胞癌治疗反应和预后[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 535-542.
[14] 倪美铃, 周芳. 单细胞RNA测序技术在再生障碍性贫血中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(12): 945-950.
[15] 杨珂, 程梓荷, 王胜昱. 多组学技术在急性肺损伤中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 159-164.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?