切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 227 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.02.007

论著

83例慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期D-二聚体与白蛋白比值、CT参数和肺功能相关性分析
郑旭峰1, 陈法桂2, 高永槟1, 郑锦镇2, 朱慈燕2, 张庆武1, 林黛英1,()   
  1. 1515000 汕头,汕头市中心医院放射科
    2515000 汕头,汕头市中心医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-25 出版日期:2026-04-25
  • 通信作者: 林黛英
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金立项项目(B2023426); 汕头市医疗卫生科技计划(221118176491192)

Correlation between D-dimer-to-albumin ratio, chest CT indicators and pulmonary function in 83 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Xufeng Zheng1, Fagui Chen2, Yongbin Gao1, Jinzhen Zheng2, Ciyan Zhu2, Qingwu Zhang1, Daiying Lin1,()   

  1. 1Department of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou 515000, China
    2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shantou 515000, China
  • Received:2025-09-25 Published:2026-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Daiying Lin
引用本文:

郑旭峰, 陈法桂, 高永槟, 郑锦镇, 朱慈燕, 张庆武, 林黛英. 83例慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期D-二聚体与白蛋白比值、CT参数和肺功能相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 227-233.

Xufeng Zheng, Fagui Chen, Yongbin Gao, Jinzhen Zheng, Ciyan Zhu, Qingwu Zhang, Daiying Lin. Correlation between D-dimer-to-albumin ratio, chest CT indicators and pulmonary function in 83 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(02): 227-233.

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, AECOPD)D-二聚体与白蛋白比值(D-dimer and albumin ratio, DAR)和计算机断层扫描(computed tomography, CT)参数与肺功能的关系。

方法

回顾性纳入2019年3月至2024年12月我院收治的83例AECOPD患者为观察组、82例COPD患者为对照组。比较两组肺功能、DAR、CT参数。采用Spearman秩相关分析DAR、胸部CT和肺功能的关系。

结果

观察组DAR高于对照组[17.90(12.17,38.93)比8.39(6.27,13.73),P<0.001]。DAR诊断AECOPD受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)0.827高于C反应蛋白AUC 0.803、中性粒细胞计数AUC 0.647、淋巴细胞计数AUC 0.639、单核细胞计数AUC 0.637。观察组肺容积小于对照组[(3.58±0.93) L比(4.77±1.14) L,t=7.351,P<0.001],肺气肿指数(emphysema index, EI)[19.36(10.62,30.46)% 比6.03(3.83,12.08)%,Z=-6.965,P<0.001]和空气潴留指数(air trapping index, ATI)[0.97±0.02比0.91±0.02,t=19.270,P<0.001]高于对照组,第1秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1)[53.00(42.00,69.00)% 比62.50(50.00,74.00)%,Z=-2.259,P=0.024]、FEV1/用力肺活量百分比(forced vital capacity, FVC)[58.22(51.87,65.48)% 比63.71(55.23,68.77)%,Z=-2.720,P=0.007]、最大呼气中段流量速(maximum mid-expiratory flow, MMEF)[25.00(15.25,34.50)% 比29.55(21.05,41.00)%,Z=-2.030,P=0.042]、一氧化碳弥散量(carbon monoxide dispersion capacity, DLCO)[63.00(45.50,77.50)% 比75.00(55.25,89.00)%,Z=-3.222,P=0.001]低于对照组(P<0.05)。Spearman及多元线性回归分析显示,DAR与FEV1(Rho=-0.287,P<0.001)、FEV1/FVC(Rho=-0.264,P<0.001)、MMEF(Rho=-0.267,P<0.001)呈负相关。肺容积与FEV1(Rho=0.336,P<0.001)、FEV1/FVC(Rho=0.281,P<0.001)、MMEF(Rho=0.215,P=0.001)、DLCO(Rho=0.195,P=0.011)呈正相关,ATI与FEV1(Rho=-0.311,P<0.001)、FEV1/FVC(Rho=-0.309,P<0.001)、MMEF(Rho=-0.286,P<0.001)、DLCO(Rho=-0.299,P<0.001)呈负相关,EI与FEV1(Rho=-0.281,P<0.001)、FEV1/FVC(Rho=-0.289,P<0.001)、DLCO(Rho=-0.162,P=0.038)呈负相关。DAR预测AECOPD再入院或死亡AUC为0.783(95%CI:0.575~0.992),最佳截断值为16.448,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,DAR<16.448(n=18)AECOPD无事件生存率高于DAR≥16.448(n=19)患者(88.89% 比47.37%,χ2=6.973,P=0.008)。

结论

AECOPD患者DAR、肺容积、EI和ATI与肺功能指标存在相关性。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the D-dimer to albumin ratio (DAR), chest computed tomography (CT) parameters, and pulmonary function in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients with AECOPD (observation group) and 82 patients with COPD (control group) admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2024. Pulmonary function, DAR, and CT parameters were compared between the two groups. Spearman′s rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships among DAR, chest CT parameters, and pulmonary function.

Results

The DAR in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [17.90 (12.17, 38.93) vs. 8.39 (6.27, 13.73), P<0.001]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for DAR in diagnosing AECOPD was 0.827, which was higher than that of C-reactive protein (AUC 0.803), neutrophil count (AUC 0.647), lymphocyte count (AUC 0.639), and monocyte count (AUC 0.637). The lung volume in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [(3.58±0.93)L vs. (4.77±1.14)L, t=7.351, P<0.001], while the emphysema index (EI) [19.36(10.62, 30.46)% vs. 6.03(3.83, 12.08)%, Z=-6.965, P<0.001] and air trapping index (ATI) [0.97±0.02 vs. 0.91±0.02, t=19.270, P<0.001] were significantly higher. The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) [53.00 (42.00, 69.00)% vs. 62.50 (50.00, 74.00)%, Z=-2.259, P=0.024], FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) [58.22 (51.87, 65.48)% vs. 63.71 (55.23, 68.77)%, Z=-2.720, P=0.007], maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) [25.00 (15.25, 34.50)% vs. 29.55 (21.05, 41.00)%, Z=-2.030, P=0.042], and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) [63.00 (45.50, 77.50)% vs. 75.00 (55.25, 89.00)%, Z=-3.222, P=0.001] were significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P<0.05). Spearman′s rank correlation and multiple linear regression analyses showed that DAR was negatively correlated with FEV1 (Rho=-0.287, P<0.001), FEV1/FVC (Rho=-0.264, P<0.001), and MMEF (Rho=-0.267, P<0.001). Lung volume was positively correlated with FEV1(Rho=0.336, P<0.001), FEV1/FVC (Rho=0.281, P<0.001), MMEF (Rho=0.215, P=0.001), and DLCO (Rho=0.195, P=0.011). ATI was negatively correlated with FEV1 (Rho=-0.311, P<0.001), FEV1/FVC (Rho=-0.309, P<0.001), MMEF (Rho=-0.286, P<0.001), and DLCO (Rho=-0.299, P<0.001). EI was negatively correlated with FEV1 (Rho=-0.281, P<0.001), FEV1/FVC (Rho=-0.289, P<0.001), and DLCO (Rho=-0.162, P=0.038). The AUC of DAR for predicting readmission or death in AECOPD was 0.783 (95%CI: 0.575~0.992), with an optimal cutoff value of 16.448. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the event-free survival rate of AECOPD patients with DAR<16.448 (n=18) was significantly higher than that of patients with DAR ≥16.448(n=19) (88.89% vs. 47.37%, χ2=6.973, P=0.008).

Conclusion

DAR, lung volume, EI, and ATI in AECOPD patients are correlated with pulmonary function parameters.

表1 两组COPD患者临床资料结果比较
临床资料 观察组(n=83) 对照组(n=82) t/Z2 P
合并症[n(%)]        
高血压 21(25.30) 13(15.85) 2.250 0.134
糖尿病 6(7.23) 4(4.88) 0.746a
冠状动脉疾病 9(10.84) 6(7.32) 0.621 0.431
GOLD分级[n(%)]     0.334 0.564
Ⅰ~Ⅱ级 67(80.72) 69(84.15)    
Ⅲ~Ⅳ级 16(19.28) 13(15.85)    
用药史[n(%)]        
吸入性糖皮质激素 79(95.18) 74(90.24) 1.491 0.222
长效β2受体激动剂 73(87.95) 70(85.37) 0.239 0.625
长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂 59(71.08) 61(74.39) 0.227 0.634
实验室检查[M50(Q25Q75)]        
CPR(mg/L) 32.20(9.97,94.66) 4.58(1.65,13.37) -6.714 0.000
NEU(×109/L) 5.55(3.97,8.65) 4.40(3.23,6.07) -3.269 0.001
LYM(×109/L) 0.97(0.63,1.39) 1.31(0.96,1.82) -3.090 0.002
MON(×109/L) 0.50(0.39,0.70) 0.43(0.27,0.53) -3.041 0.002
丙氨酸氨基转移酶(U/L) 15.26(11.71,23.94) 14.57(11.63,21.15) -0.319 0.749
门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(U/L) 22.80(18.44,35.34) 20.27(16.71,26.49) -0.575 0.610
甘油三酯(mmol/L) 1.03(0.73,1.44) 1.00(0.72,1.49) -0.223 0.823
血清肌酐(μmol/L) 66.88(56.36,86.51) 63.25(52.73,72.70) -1.216 0.127
血清尿素氮(mmol/L) 6.68(4.84,8.92) 6.23(4.87,7.21) -1.042 0.141
DAR 17.90(12.17,38.93) 8.39(6.27,13.73) -7.251 0.000
肺功能指标[M50(Q25Q75)]        
FEV1(%) 53.00(42.00,69.00) 62.50(50.00,74.00) -2.259 0.024
FEV1/FVC(%) 58.22(51.87,65.48) 63.71(55.23,68.77) -2.720 0.007
MMEF(%) 25.00(15.25,34.50) 29.55(21.05,41.00) -2.030 0.042
DLCO(%) 63.00(45.50,77.50) 75.00(55.25,89.00) -3.222 0.001
表2 AECOPD患者的ROC曲线结果分析
图1 73岁男性(GOLD Ⅲ级)AECOPD胸部CT扫描。图A为CT横断位平扫显示,支气管壁增厚且界限不清,气管内黏液,毛玻璃样混浊,伴有轻度纵隔淋巴结病;图B为CT矢状位平扫显示小叶中央型肺气肿征象,胸廓膨胀,左下叶异常低密度,其间血管影稀疏
表3 DAR、CT参数与肺功能的相关性分析
1
任成山,王关嵩,钱桂生. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成因及其治疗的困惑与希望[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(2): 127-141.
2
Chow R, So OW, Im JHB, et al. Predictors of readmission, for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-A systematic review[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2023, 18: 2581-2617.
3
Siu DCH, Gafni-Lachter L. Addressing barriers to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care: Three innovative evidence-based approaches: A review[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2024, 19: 331-341.
4
Kahnert K, Jörres RA, Behr J, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of COPD and its comorbidities[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2023, 120(25): 434-444.
5
Jeyachandran V, Hurst JR. Advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: management of exacerbations[J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond), 2022, 83(7): 1-7.
6
Hurst JR, Han MK, Singh B, et al. Prognostic risk factors for moderate-to-severe exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review[J]. Respir Res, 2022, 23(1): 213.
7
Xu J, Zeng Q, Li S, et al. Inflammation mechanism and research progress of COPD[J]. Front Immunol, 2024, 15: 1404615.
8
Lin P, Shen C, Li Q, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in asia: risk factors for readmission and readmission rate[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2024, 24(1): 388.
9
Ji M, Li Y, Zhu X, et al. Associating serum IgM, IgA levels with thoracic CT indicators and pulmonary function indexes in acutely exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients[J]. Discov Med, 2023, 35(178): 815-822.
10
Kyriakopoulos C, Gogali A, Kostikas K, et al. Hypercoagulable state in COPD-A comprehensive literature review[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(8): 1447.
11
Xiao B, Yang Z, Liang H, et al. Predictive value of D-dimer to albumin ratio for severe illness and mortality in patients with COVID-19[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2024, 11: 1410179.
12
Lu W, Jia F, Rao M, et al. Predicting preoperative deep vein thrombosis using d-dimer-to-albumin ratio combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in older patients with hip fracture[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2025, 20: 873-879.
13
Wei L, Xie H, Wang Q, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative D-dimer to albumin ratio for overall survival and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer[J]. Front Physiol, 2024, 15: 1369855.
14
Thawanaphong S, Nair P. Contemporary concise review 2024: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Respirology, 2025, 30(7): 574-586.
15
Agustí A, Celli BR, Criner GJ, et al. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease 2023 report: GOLD executive summary[J]. Eur Respir J, 2023, 61(4): 2300239.
16
Xu Z, Li F, Xin Y, et al. Prognostic risk prediction model for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Respir Res, 2024, 25(1): 410.
17
Neder JA, Berton DC, O′Donnell DE. Using the pulmonary function laboratory to assist in disease management: COPD[J]. J Bras Pneumol, 2023, 49(3): e20230171.
18
高鹏宇. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者TEG参数与凝血四项指标变化的相关性[J]. 河南医学研究2021, 30(9): 1706-1708.
19
Reid BE, DiGiuseppe S, Akbarian-Tefaghi H. Elevated D-dimer levels in the exacerbation of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) with hypercapnia[J]. Cureus, 2025, 17(2): e79574.
20
王建国,张东友,李昂,等. D-二聚体在高龄老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者中的临床意义[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志2024, 16(10): 1250-1252.
21
武晓敏,李雷花. D-二聚体与纤维蛋白原比值在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 河南医学研究2024, 33(8): 1430-1433.
22
Lan CC, Yang MC, Su WL, et al. Unraveling the immune landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Insights into inflammatory cell subtypes, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2025, 26(7): 3365.
23
Cai C, Zeng W, Wang H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) as biomarkers in diagnosis evaluation of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective, observational study[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2024, 19: 933-943.
24
王丽萍,王真真,葛庆波,等. A2DS2评分联合中性粒细胞百分比/白蛋白比值、D-二聚体对AIS患者发生卒中相关性肺炎的预测价值[J]. 现代生物医学进展2025, 25(14): 2335-2342.
25
任思达,吴展陵. 超敏C反应蛋白/前白蛋白、D-二聚体在结核性渗出性胸膜炎中表达水平及诊断价值[J]. 中国医学工程2024, 32(6): 52-56.
26
Eygi E, Bayrakci S. Association of albumin-to-D-dimer ratio with mortality in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(11): 3917.
27
Kyriakopoulos C, Chronis C, Papapetrou E, et al. Prothrombotic state in patients with stable COPD: an observational study[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2021, 7(4): 00297-2021.
28
Zinellu E, Fois AG, Sotgiu E, et al. Serum albumin concentrations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(2): 269.
29
Sun J, Liao X, Yan Y, et al. Detection and staging of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a computed tomography-based weakly supervised deep learning approach[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(8): 5319-5329.
30
Zou X, Tian B, Lin Q, et al. Diagnostic value of CT in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at high altitude: Observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2024, 103(44): e40291.
31
徐纪文,徐静雅,宗斌,等. COPD并发肺部感染TLR4/NF-κB通路与细胞因子水平及意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(2): 221-223.
32
Liu Q, Wu B, Xie R, et al. Association between serum albumin and pulmonary function in adolescents: analyses of NHANES 2007-2012[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2024, 24(1): 554.
33
Aydin C, Yıldız BP, Hattatoglu DG. D-dimer/Fibrinogen ratio and recurrent exacerbations might have a potential impact to predict 90-day mortality in patients with COPD exacerbation[J]. Malawi Med J, 2021, 33(4): 276-280.
[1] 黄恩民, 侯泽辉, 马宁, 陈双, 周太成. 腹腔镜下膈肌折叠术在成人膈膨升中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 422-426.
[2] 肖攀云, 吴晓玲, 郝晓敏, 卫飞飞, 杨薇. 贝达喹啉合并肠内营养支持治疗对57例耐多药肺结核的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 106-111.
[3] 王辉, 汪海涛, 张建庆. 立体定向放射治疗后使用替雷利珠单抗治疗112例mNSCLC患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 124-131.
[4] 吴蓉, 蔡喆燚, 黄运华, 乐金海, 张萍, 陈献, 易琼. 跨肺驱动压导向呼气末正压通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺功能及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 866-871.
[5] 王春, 许斌, 刘丹, 陶承志, 林欢, 张海涛. 支气管肺泡灌洗液PTPN2水平与矽肺患者疾病严重程度和肺功能的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 904-910.
[6] 李晓颜, 邢爱花, 董瑞生, 王瑞玲, 贾子江, 郑丽琴. 血管细胞黏附分子-1、肝素结合蛋白蛋白及调节性T细胞水平检测对支气管哮喘并发肺部感染患者的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 911-916.
[7] 张雯, 王关嵩, 张立根, 王霞. 肺部超声在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1023-1026.
[8] 唐林, 宋诗涛, 周许, 苗连海, 张云凤, 袁晨. 衰弱指数与老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重期病情程度的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 985-990.
[9] 刘雅文, 孙延虎, 许晓函, 李岳, 王旭东. 电阻抗断层成像技术指导滴定呼气末正压通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 966-972.
[10] 付建力, 李鹏飞, 尹珊珊, 张艳彬, 胥杰, 刘涌. 吸入性皮质类固醇/长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β2受体激动剂联用治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病哮喘重叠综合征的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 961-965.
[11] 杨苗苗, 顾翔, 杨柳, 孙天宇, 王梦林, 张拓, 王婷. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴肺气肿患者嗜酸性粒细胞计数与肺泡损伤的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 955-960.
[12] 林隆, 卜小宁, 党斌温, 胡嘉艺, 贾雪宏, 牛津牧. 布地格福吸入气雾剂联合无创正压通气对AECOPD并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 779-783.
[13] 刘虹, 李国蓉, 战祥哲, 高海燕, 刘洪千, 赵永辉. 高频胸壁振荡排痰与传统气道廓清术在治疗重症肺炎中的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 802-806.
[14] 王东, 莫才周, 古子文, 赵雅丽, 郭娇贤, 金朝红, 陆漫, 马国祥. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者血清电解质及营养状况与预后的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 824-827.
[15] 常亮, 王瀚宇, 徐阳, 王建龙, 王宝, 郑国强, 郝巍山, 李小燕. 经鼻高流量氧疗与无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并低氧血症的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 737-741.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?