Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02): 282-288. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2026.02.015

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in 89 patients with severe pneumonia

Yingkai Feng1,(), Chen Su2, Bo Peng3, Zhili Han4, Xiaoming Wang1, Guanyu Tao1, Liubo Xiong1, Lian Wang1, Xingbing Chen4   

  1. 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu 610200, China
    2Department of traditional Chinese medicine, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu 610200, China
    4Intensive Care Unit, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu 610200, China
    3Department of Respiratory Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2025-09-09 Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-05-12
  • Contact: Yingkai Feng

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescriptions in improving the early outcomes and prognosis of severe pneumonia when used in combination with comprehensive treatments such as anti-infection therapy, glucocorticoids, and Xuebijing, and to explore the optimal TCM prescription for early integrated TCM-Western medicine therapy in severe pneumonia to enhance treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Methods

A total of 89 patients with early-stage severe pneumonia who met the inclusion criteria were selected and divided into a control group (antibiotic, glucocorticoid, and Xuebijing group, 46 cases) and an observation group (antibiotic, glucocorticoid, Xuebijing, and TCM group, 43 cases) based on their willingness to take TCM. The control group received treatment with levofloxacin, hydrocortisone, and Xuebijing. The observation group received additional TCM prescriptions tailored to their syndrome differentiation on the basis of the control group′s treatment. The serum infection markers [white blood cell count (WBC), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], oxygenation indicators, treatment efficacy, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

After treatment, serum infection markers (WBC, hs-CRP, PCT, SAA, IL-6) in both groups showed significant improvement compared to pre-treatment levels. The observation group exhibited lower levels of WBC(9.78±0.85)×109/L、hs-CRP(7.23±0.15) mg/L、PCT (0.09±0.00)pg/ml、SAA (10.27±0.25)mg/L、IL-6 9.35 (7.48, 13.32) pg/ml than those of the control group(11.15±0.76)×109/L, (12.73 ± 0.89) mg/L, (0.15±0.00) pg/ml, (24.20±1.32) mg/L, 18.34 (13.54, 21.51) pg/ml. The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in reducing serum inflammatory markers, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Notably, IL-6 levels decreased markedly, approaching the normal reference range. After, arterial blood gas oxygenation indicators (PaO2, SaO2, oxygenation index PaO2/FiO2) in both groups improved significantly compared to pre-treatment levels. The observation group showed higher PaO2(95.64±8.25) mmHg, SaO2(98.58±4.41)%、PaO2/FiO2(333.27±10.89)mmHg than those of the control group(84.74±5.90) mmHg, (94.63±7.39)%, (240.50±12.01) mmHg. The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in improving arterial oxygenation indicators, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The observation group had shorter durations for fever resolution (2.38 days), cough and sputum relief (6.32 days), mechanical ventilation (75.38 hours), chest CT inflammation absorption (8.46 days), and average hospitalization (10.74 days) compared to the control group (5.31 days, 11.88 days, 128.53 hours, 13.25 days, 13.34 days, respectively). The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in reducing these indicators, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Both groups showed reduced CPIS scores at D14 compared. The observation group achieved a CPIS score of 4.15, which was significantly lower than the control group′s 6.57. The effective rate in the observation group (79.07%) was slightly higher than that in the control group (76.40%), but the difference was not statistically significant; The mortality rate in the observation group (16.28%) was comparable to that in the control group (17.39%), with no statistically significant difference. The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (27.91%) was similar to that in the control group (28.26%), showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Most adverse reactions were mild, including rashes, slight dizziness, and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, bloating), with no severe myocardial damage or liver and kidney function impairment observed.

Conclusion

The combined treatment of traditional Chinese and Western medicine (anti infection+ hydrocortisone+ Xuebijing+ Chinese herbal formula) can significantly improve various inflammatory indicators, improve oxygenation, shorten the course of disease, achieve ideal therapeutic effects, and have mild adverse reactions and good safety. It can be used as the preferred early treatment plan for severe pneumonia. (2) Traditional Chinese medicine formulas have certain adjuvant therapeutic value for severe pneumonia, but there is no definite advantage in improving overall efficacy and reducing mortality.

Key words: Severe pneumonia, Treatment plan, Corticosteroids, Xuebijing, Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation and treatment

京ICP 备07035254号-28
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 023-65425691 E-mail: xqcjld@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd