切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.01.008

所属专题: 专题评论 总编推荐 文献

论著

慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试评分对预后的评估意义
王昌明1,(), 翁帮琼1, 魏卿2   
  1. 1. 611930 四川,四川省彭州市人民医院呼吸内科
    2. 611930 四川,四川省彭州市人民医院重症监护室
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-23 出版日期:2017-02-25
  • 通信作者: 王昌明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81300197)

Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Changming Wang1,(), Bangqiong Weng1, Qing Wei2   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory, Pengzhou People′s Hospital, Pengzhou, Sichuan 611930, China
  • Received:2016-02-23 Published:2017-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Changming Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Changming, Email:
引用本文:

王昌明, 翁帮琼, 魏卿. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试评分对预后的评估意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(01): 35-40.

Changming Wang, Bangqiong Weng, Qing Wei. Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(01): 35-40.

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评分与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者预后因素之间的相关性,明确CAT评分对COPD患者预后评估的应用价值。

方法

选取2013年1月至2015年1月我院呼吸内科住院及门诊就诊的106例COPD患者为研究对象。对106例患者治疗前后进行CAT评分、6 min步行实验(6MWD)、改良英国MRC呼吸困难指数(mMRC)、BODE(B为体质量指数,O为气道阻塞程度,D为呼吸困难分数,E为运动耐力)指数、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分及肺功能的测定。采用单因素线性相关分析CAT评分与患者各临床特征之间的相关性。

结果

随着CAT评分的升高,患者6MWD、用力呼气容积(FVC)实测值、FVC实测/预测值、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)实测值、FEV1实测/预测值、FEV1/FVC、呼气峰流速(PEF)实测值、PEF实测/预测值均明显降低(P<0.05),而mMRC评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分明显升高(P<0.05);患者经短期治疗后,CAT评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),而6MWD、FEV1实测值、FEV1实测/预测值、FEV1/FVC则均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05);单因素相关分析发现,治疗前CAT评分与mMRC评分(r=0.254,P=0.018)、BODE指数(r=0.426,P=0.009)及SGRQ总评分(r=0.563,P=0.007)呈显著正相关,与6MWD(r=-0.387,P=0.008)、FVC实测值(r=-0.181,P=0.023)、FVC实测/预测值(r=-0.192,P=0.021)、FEV1实测值(r=-0.201,P=0.016)、FEV1实测/预测值(r=-0.214,P=0.013)及FEV1/FVC(r=-0.223,P=0.012)呈显著负相关;治疗后CAT评分与mMRC评分(r=0.304,P=0.011)、BODE指数(r=0.382,P=0.010)及SGRQ总评分(r=0.621,P=0.004)呈显著正相关,与6MWD(r=-0.407,P=0.007)、FEV1实测值(r=-0.211,P=0.014)、FEV1实测/预测值(r=-0.228,P=0.012)及FEV1/FVC(r=-0.231,P=0.011)呈显著负相关。

结论

CAT评分与COPD患者mMRC评分、BODE指数、SGRQ总评分、6MWD及肺功能指标均有较好的相关性,具有较好的预测COPD患者预后的应用价值。

Objective

To study the correlation between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score (CAT) and prognostic factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and explore the clinical application value of CAT in assessing the prognosis of patients with COPD.

Methods

Au 106 patients with diagnosed COPD in the department of resiratory of our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were enrolled in the study. The CAT score, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), modified medical British research council (mMRC), BODE index, St George′s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and pulmonary function indices were collected before and after treatment. The correlation between the CAT scores and clinical characteristics were analyzed by univariate linear correlation.

Results

With the CAT scores increased, the 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC) measured values, FVC observed/predicted value, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured values, FEV1 observed/predicted values, FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured values, PEF observed/predicted values were significantly lower (P<0.05), while mMRC score, BODE index and SGRQ total score were significantly higher (P<0.05); After the short-term treatment for patients, the CAT scores, BODE index and SGRQ total scores were significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), while 6MWD, FEV1 measured values, FEV1 observed/predicted values, FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05); The univariate analysis found that the CAT score in pre-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.254, P=0.018), BODE index (r=0.426, P=0.009) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.563, P=0.007), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.387, P=0.000), FVC measured values (r=-0.181, P=0.023), FVC observed/predicted value (r=-0.192, P=0.021), FEV1 measured values (r=-0.201, P=0.016), FEV1 observed/predicted values (r=-0.214, P=0.013) and FEV1/FVC (r=-0.223, P=0.012); the CAT score in post-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.304, P=0.011), BODE index (r=0.382, P=0.010) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.621, P=0.004), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.407, P=0.000), FEV1 measured values (r=-0.211, P=0.014), FEV1 observed/predicted values (r=-0.228, P=0.012) and FEV1/FVC (r=-0.231, P=0.011).

Conclusions

The CAT score has a good correlation with mMRC scale, BODE index, SGRQ, 6MWD and pulmonary function in COPD patients, suggesting which has a potential to predict the prognosis of COPD.

表1 不同CAT评分COPD患者的临床特征比较(±s)
表2 106例COPD患者治疗前后相关临床特征比较(±s)
表3 治疗前后COPD患者CAT评分与预后因素的相关性分析
1
任成山,钱桂生. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病机制研究现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志:电子版,2009, 2(2): 104-115.
2
Cleutjens F, Triest F, Wilke S, et al. New insights in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidity[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 191(9): 1081-1082.
3
万敏,张巧,李莹,等. 首诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病认知情况调查[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2011, 33(23): 2527-2529.
4
吕青兰. 慢性心力衰竭合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者预后影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2013, 33(14): 3338-3339.
5
Minov J, Karadzinska-Bislimovska J, Vasilevska K, et al. Course of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores during bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated in outpatient setting[J]. Open Respir Med J, 2015, 9: 39-45.
6
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17.
7
Saglam M, Vardar-Yagli N, Savci S, et al. Functional capacity, physical activity, and quality of life in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 423-428.
8
蔡睿,侯刚,王秋月,等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试对生存质量的评估价值研究[J]. 中国实用内科杂志,2011, 31(11): 847-849.
9
Becker C, Schäfer J, Carvalho LL, et al. CAT correlates positively with respiratory rate and is a significant predictor of the impact of COPD on daily life of patients: a cross sectional study[J]. Multidiscip Respir Med, 2014, 9(1): 47.
10
Suetomo M, Kawayama T, Kinoshita T, et al. COPD assessment tests scores are associated with exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japanese patients[J]. Respir Investig, 2014, 52(5): 288-295.
11
尹慧,龙翔,宋卫东. 振动排痰对不同肺功能分级慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志:电子版,2014, 7(1): 66-67.
12
Papaioannou M, Pitsiou G, Manika K, et al. COPD assessment test: a simple tool to evaluate disease severity and response to treatment[J]. COPD, 2014, 11(5): 489-495.
13
Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Limsukon A, et al. Detection of acute deterioration in health status visit among COPD patients by monitoring COPD assessment test score[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 277-282.
14
Feliz-Rodriguez D, Zudaire S, Carpio C, et al. Evolution of the COPD Assessment Test score during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: determinants and prognostic value[J]. Can Respir J, 2013, 20(5): e92-e97.
15
Hoogendoorn M, Feenstra TL, Hoogenveen RT, et al. Association between lung function and exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD[J]. nt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2010, 5: 435-444.
16
Tantucci C, Modina D. Lung function decline in COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2012, 7: 95-99.
17
Kurzaj M, Wierzejski W, Dor A, et al. The impact of specialized physiotherapy methods on BODE index in COPD patients during hospitalization[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2013, 22(5): 721-730.
18
Araujo ZT, Holanda GDoes the BODE index correlate with quality of life in patients with COPD?[J]. J Bras Pneumol, 2010, 36(4): 447-452.
19
Lin YX, Xu WN, Liang LR, et al. The cross-sectional and longitudinal association of the BODE index with quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2009, 122(24): 2939-2944.
20
Tang CY, Taylor NF, Blackstock FC. Chest physiotherapy for patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review[J]. Physiotherapy, 2010, 96(1): 1-13.
21
Celli BR. Predictors of mortality in COPD[J]. Respir Med, 2010, 104(6): 773-779.
[1] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[2] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[5] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[6] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[7] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[8] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[9] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[10] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[11] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 魏红涛, 普布仓决, 格桑央宗, 黎燕, 益西旺扎, 李鹏. 拉萨地区上消化道溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌感染及治疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 662-665.
阅读次数
全文


摘要