慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试评分对预后的评估意义

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.01.008

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评分与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者预后因素之间的相关性，明确CAT评分对COPD患者预后评估的应用价值。

方法

选取2013年1月至2015年1月我院呼吸内科住院及门诊就诊的106例COPD患者为研究对象。对106例患者治疗前后进行CAT评分、6 min步行实验(6MWD)、改良英国MRC呼吸困难指数(mMRC)、BODE(B为体质量指数，O为气道阻塞程度，D为呼吸困难分数，E为运动耐力)指数、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分及肺功能的测定。采用单因素线性相关分析CAT评分与患者各临床特征之间的相关性。

结果

随着CAT评分的升高，患者6MWD、用力呼气容积(FVC)实测值、FVC实测/预测值、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)实测值、FEV₁实测/预测值、FEV₁/FVC、呼气峰流速(PEF)实测值、PEF实测/预测值均明显降低(P<0.05)，而mMRC评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分明显升高(P<0.05)；患者经短期治疗后，CAT评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05)，而6MWD、FEV₁实测值、FEV₁实测/预测值、FEV₁/FVC则均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05)；单因素相关分析发现，治疗前CAT评分与mMRC评分(r＝0.254，P＝0.018)、BODE指数(r＝0.426，P＝0.009)及SGRQ总评分(r＝0.563，P＝0.007)呈显著正相关，与6MWD(r＝－0.387，P＝0.008)、FVC实测值(r＝－0.181，P＝0.023)、FVC实测/预测值(r＝－0.192，P＝0.021)、FEV₁实测值(r＝－0.201，P＝0.016)、FEV₁实测/预测值(r＝－0.214，P＝0.013)及FEV₁/FVC(r＝－0.223，P＝0.012)呈显著负相关；治疗后CAT评分与mMRC评分(r＝0.304，P＝0.011)、BODE指数(r＝0.382，P＝0.010)及SGRQ总评分(r＝0.621，P＝0.004)呈显著正相关，与6MWD(r＝－0.407，P＝0.007)、FEV₁实测值(r＝－0.211，P＝0.014)、FEV₁实测/预测值(r＝－0.228，P＝0.012)及FEV₁/FVC(r＝－0.231，P＝0.011)呈显著负相关。

结论

CAT评分与COPD患者mMRC评分、BODE指数、SGRQ总评分、6MWD及肺功能指标均有较好的相关性，具有较好的预测COPD患者预后的应用价值。

关键词: 肺疾病，慢性阻塞性, 评估测试，肺疾病，慢性阻塞性, 预后, 相关性

Objective

To study the correlation between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score (CAT) and prognostic factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and explore the clinical application value of CAT in assessing the prognosis of patients with COPD.

Methods

Au 106 patients with diagnosed COPD in the department of resiratory of our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were enrolled in the study. The CAT score, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), modified medical British research council (mMRC), BODE index, St George′s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and pulmonary function indices were collected before and after treatment. The correlation between the CAT scores and clinical characteristics were analyzed by univariate linear correlation.

Results

With the CAT scores increased, the 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC) measured values, FVC observed/predicted value, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) measured values, FEV₁ observed/predicted values, FEV₁/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured values, PEF observed/predicted values were significantly lower (P<0.05), while mMRC score, BODE index and SGRQ total score were significantly higher (P<0.05); After the short-term treatment for patients, the CAT scores, BODE index and SGRQ total scores were significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), while 6MWD, FEV₁ measured values, FEV₁ observed/predicted values, FEV₁/FVC were significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05); The univariate analysis found that the CAT score in pre-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.254, P=0.018), BODE index (r=0.426, P=0.009) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.563, P=0.007), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.387, P=0.000), FVC measured values (r=-0.181, P=0.023), FVC observed/predicted value (r=-0.192, P=0.021), FEV₁ measured values (r=-0.201, P=0.016), FEV₁ observed/predicted values (r=-0.214, P=0.013) and FEV₁/FVC (r=-0.223, P=0.012); the CAT score in post-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.304, P=0.011), BODE index (r=0.382, P=0.010) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.621, P=0.004), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.407, P=0.000), FEV₁ measured values (r=-0.211, P=0.014), FEV₁ observed/predicted values (r=-0.228, P=0.012) and FEV₁/FVC (r=-0.231, P=0.011).

Conclusions

The CAT score has a good correlation with mMRC scale, BODE index, SGRQ, 6MWD and pulmonary function in COPD patients, suggesting which has a potential to predict the prognosis of COPD.

Key words: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment, Prognosis, Correlation

表1 不同CAT评分COPD患者的临床特征比较(±s)

临床资料	A组(n＝19)	B组(n＝41)	C组(n＝32)	D组(n＝14)
年龄(±s，岁)	65.3±10.3	67.2±11.3	66.8±16.1	67.0±13.6
BMI指数(kg/m²)	23.1±6.3	22.6±5.3	23.5±5.8	24.0±6.1
6MWD (m)	365.5±43.2	272.6±32.0^a	260.1±27.4^a	223.5±25.8^a
mMRC (分)	1.15±0.32	1.89±0.24^a	2.13±0.38^a	3.58±0.46^a
BODE指数(分)	1.2±0.6	2.8±0.5^a	3.3±0.7^a	3.7±0.5^a
SGRQ总评分(分)	31.5±9.2	43.2±8.5^a	56.3±10.2^a	68.6±8.5^a
FVC实测值(L)	3.50±0.72	2.65±0.88^a	2.44±0.95^a	2.13±0.86^a
FVC实测/预测值	105.6±12.5	86.3±8.6^a	76.4±8.0^a	70.5±9.1^a
FEV₁实测值(L)	3.24±0.85	2.35±0.75^a	2.12±0.68^a	1.86±0.47^a
FEV₁实测/预测值	82.3±8.6	75.5±7.0^a	65.3±7.2^a	57.8±6.6^a
FEV₁/FVC(%)	68.5±6.9	59.4±5.8^a	58.7±7.0^a	50.2±6.3^a
PEF实测值(L/s)	5.64±1.2	3.92±1.0^a	3.64±1.1^a	3.55±1.2^a
PEF实测/预测值	68.5±7.1	49.5±6.3^a	46.1±5.0^a	43.0±5.6^a

表1 不同CAT评分COPD患者的临床特征比较(±s)

临床资料	A组(n＝19)	B组(n＝41)	C组(n＝32)	D组(n＝14)
年龄(±s，岁)	65.3±10.3	67.2±11.3	66.8±16.1	67.0±13.6
BMI指数(kg/m²)	23.1±6.3	22.6±5.3	23.5±5.8	24.0±6.1
6MWD (m)	365.5±43.2	272.6±32.0^a	260.1±27.4^a	223.5±25.8^a
mMRC (分)	1.15±0.32	1.89±0.24^a	2.13±0.38^a	3.58±0.46^a
BODE指数(分)	1.2±0.6	2.8±0.5^a	3.3±0.7^a	3.7±0.5^a
SGRQ总评分(分)	31.5±9.2	43.2±8.5^a	56.3±10.2^a	68.6±8.5^a
FVC实测值(L)	3.50±0.72	2.65±0.88^a	2.44±0.95^a	2.13±0.86^a
FVC实测/预测值	105.6±12.5	86.3±8.6^a	76.4±8.0^a	70.5±9.1^a
FEV₁实测值(L)	3.24±0.85	2.35±0.75^a	2.12±0.68^a	1.86±0.47^a
FEV₁实测/预测值	82.3±8.6	75.5±7.0^a	65.3±7.2^a	57.8±6.6^a
FEV₁/FVC(%)	68.5±6.9	59.4±5.8^a	58.7±7.0^a	50.2±6.3^a
PEF实测值(L/s)	5.64±1.2	3.92±1.0^a	3.64±1.1^a	3.55±1.2^a
PEF实测/预测值	68.5±7.1	49.5±6.3^a	46.1±5.0^a	43.0±5.6^a

表2 106例COPD患者治疗前后相关临床特征比较(±s)

预后因素	A、B组(＝60)		C、D组(＝46)
预后因素	治疗前	治疗后	治疗前	治疗后
平均CAT评分	12.39±3.54	10.60±2.65^a	27.20±4.04	18.30±2.67^a
BMI指数(kg/m²)	22.70±6.32	23.50±5.06	23.60±7.12	24.10±6.51
6MWD (m)	302.1±33.2	325.6±25.7^a	248.9±35.4	284.5±34.7^a
mMRC (分)	1.48±0.22	1.02±0.26^a	2.67±0.47	2.03±0.35^a
BODE指数(分)	2.4±0.7	1.2±0.5^a	3.5±0.6	2.2±0.4^a
SGRQ总评分(分)	36.3±9.4	28.1±5.8^a	62.6±9.5	39.5±8.4^a
FVC实测值(L)	2.91±0.97	3.21±1.24	2.34±1.19	2.85±1.21
FVC实测/预测值	92.4±12.1	94.0±13.4	74.6±8.6	80.4±9.0
FEV₁实测值(L)	2.63±0.79	2.95±0.45^a	2.04±0.97	2.68±0.35^a
FEV₁实测/预测值	79.7±8.6	85.4±9.0^a	63.0±7.4	72.2±8.3^a
FEV₁/FVC(%)	62.9±6.3	75.8±7.2^a	56.1±4.8	63.4±5.3^a
PEF实测值(L/s)	4.43±1.25	5.32±1.35	3.61±1.04	4.35±1.34
PEF实测/预测值	55.5±10.2	58.4±8.6	45.1±6.7	54.7±6.8

表2 106例COPD患者治疗前后相关临床特征比较(±s)

预后因素	A、B组(＝60)		C、D组(＝46)
预后因素	治疗前	治疗后	治疗前	治疗后
平均CAT评分	12.39±3.54	10.60±2.65^a	27.20±4.04	18.30±2.67^a
BMI指数(kg/m²)	22.70±6.32	23.50±5.06	23.60±7.12	24.10±6.51
6MWD (m)	302.1±33.2	325.6±25.7^a	248.9±35.4	284.5±34.7^a
mMRC (分)	1.48±0.22	1.02±0.26^a	2.67±0.47	2.03±0.35^a
BODE指数(分)	2.4±0.7	1.2±0.5^a	3.5±0.6	2.2±0.4^a
SGRQ总评分(分)	36.3±9.4	28.1±5.8^a	62.6±9.5	39.5±8.4^a
FVC实测值(L)	2.91±0.97	3.21±1.24	2.34±1.19	2.85±1.21
FVC实测/预测值	92.4±12.1	94.0±13.4	74.6±8.6	80.4±9.0
FEV₁实测值(L)	2.63±0.79	2.95±0.45^a	2.04±0.97	2.68±0.35^a
FEV₁实测/预测值	79.7±8.6	85.4±9.0^a	63.0±7.4	72.2±8.3^a
FEV₁/FVC(%)	62.9±6.3	75.8±7.2^a	56.1±4.8	63.4±5.3^a
PEF实测值(L/s)	4.43±1.25	5.32±1.35	3.61±1.04	4.35±1.34
PEF实测/预测值	55.5±10.2	58.4±8.6	45.1±6.7	54.7±6.8

表3 治疗前后COPD患者CAT评分与预后因素的相关性分析

预后因素	治疗前(n＝106)		治疗后(n＝106)
预后因素	r值	P值	r值	P值
BMI指数(kg/m²)	0.027	0.420	0.030	0.343
6MWD (m)	－0.387	0.008	－0.407	0.007
mMRC (分)	0.254	0.018	0.304	0.011
BODE指数(分)	0.426	0.009	0.382	0.010
SGRQ总评分(分)	0.563	0.007	0.621	0.004
FVC实测值(L)	－0.181	0.023	0.057	0.062
FVC实测/预测值	－0.192	0.021	0.074	0.055
FEV₁实测值(L)	－0.201	0.016	－0.211	0.014
FEV₁实测/预测值	－0.214	0.013	－0.228	0.012
FEV₁/FVC(%)	－0.223	0.012	－0.231	0.011
PEF实测值(L/s)	0.054	0.057	0.062	0.051
PEF实测/预测值	0.049	0.072	0.070	0.072

表3 治疗前后COPD患者CAT评分与预后因素的相关性分析

预后因素	治疗前(n＝106)		治疗后(n＝106)
预后因素	r值	P值	r值	P值
BMI指数(kg/m²)	0.027	0.420	0.030	0.343
6MWD (m)	－0.387	0.008	－0.407	0.007
mMRC (分)	0.254	0.018	0.304	0.011
BODE指数(分)	0.426	0.009	0.382	0.010
SGRQ总评分(分)	0.563	0.007	0.621	0.004
FVC实测值(L)	－0.181	0.023	0.057	0.062
FVC实测/预测值	－0.192	0.021	0.074	0.055
FEV₁实测值(L)	－0.201	0.016	－0.211	0.014
FEV₁实测/预测值	－0.214	0.013	－0.228	0.012
FEV₁/FVC(%)	－0.223	0.012	－0.231	0.011
PEF实测值(L/s)	0.054	0.057	0.062	0.051
PEF实测/预测值	0.049	0.072	0.070	0.072

1	任成山，钱桂生. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病机制研究现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志：电子版，2009, 2(2): 104-115.
2	Cleutjens F, Triest F, Wilke S, et al. New insights in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidity[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 191(9): 1081-1082.
3	万敏，张巧，李莹，等. 首诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病认知情况调查[J]. 第三军医大学学报，2011, 33(23): 2527-2529.
4	吕青兰. 慢性心力衰竭合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者预后影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2013, 33(14): 3338-3339.
5	Minov J, Karadzinska-Bislimovska J, Vasilevska K, et al. Course of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores during bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated in outpatient setting[J]. Open Respir Med J, 2015, 9: 39-45.
6	中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志，2007，30(1):8-17.
7	Saglam M, Vardar-Yagli N, Savci S, et al. Functional capacity, physical activity, and quality of life in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 423-428.
8	蔡睿，侯刚，王秋月，等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试对生存质量的评估价值研究[J]. 中国实用内科杂志，2011, 31(11): 847-849.
9	Becker C, Schäfer J, Carvalho LL, et al. CAT correlates positively with respiratory rate and is a significant predictor of the impact of COPD on daily life of patients: a cross sectional study[J]. Multidiscip Respir Med, 2014, 9(1): 47.
10	Suetomo M, Kawayama T, Kinoshita T, et al. COPD assessment tests scores are associated with exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japanese patients[J]. Respir Investig, 2014, 52(5): 288-295.
11	尹慧，龙翔，宋卫东. 振动排痰对不同肺功能分级慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志：电子版，2014, 7(1): 66-67.
12	Papaioannou M, Pitsiou G, Manika K, et al. COPD assessment test: a simple tool to evaluate disease severity and response to treatment[J]. COPD, 2014, 11(5): 489-495.
13	Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Limsukon A, et al. Detection of acute deterioration in health status visit among COPD patients by monitoring COPD assessment test score[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 277-282.
14	Feliz-Rodriguez D, Zudaire S, Carpio C, et al. Evolution of the COPD Assessment Test score during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: determinants and prognostic value[J]. Can Respir J, 2013, 20(5): e92-e97.
15	Hoogendoorn M, Feenstra TL, Hoogenveen RT, et al. Association between lung function and exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD[J]. nt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2010, 5: 435-444.
16	Tantucci C, Modina D. Lung function decline in COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2012, 7: 95-99.
17	Kurzaj M, Wierzejski W, Dor A, et al. The impact of specialized physiotherapy methods on BODE index in COPD patients during hospitalization[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2013, 22(5): 721-730.
18	Araujo ZT, Holanda GDoes the BODE index correlate with quality of life in patients with COPD？[J]. J Bras Pneumol, 2010, 36(4): 447-452.
19	Lin YX, Xu WN, Liang LR, et al. The cross-sectional and longitudinal association of the BODE index with quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2009, 122(24): 2939-2944.
20	Tang CY, Taylor NF, Blackstock FC. Chest physiotherapy for patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review[J]. Physiotherapy, 2010, 96(1): 1-13.
21	Celli BR. Predictors of mortality in COPD[J]. Respir Med, 2010, 104(6): 773-779.

[1]	马中正, 杨云川, 马翔, 周迟, 丁丁, 霍俊一, 徐楠, 崔培元, 周磊. 胰腺癌双硫死亡相关的lncRNA预后模型的构建及免疫反应研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 368-376.
[2]	屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[3]	顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[4]	付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[5]	梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6]	张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7]	孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[8]	张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[9]	伍细蓉, 徐立文, 陈亚琼. 基于LPR和FARI构建肝衰竭患者生存预后模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 675-681.
[10]	刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[11]	肖丹, 陈辰, 查晔军, 公茂琪, 花克涵, 孙伟桐, 蒋协远. 改良松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的疗效及危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-263.
[12]	李素娟, 王文玲, 董洪敏, 李小凯, 黄思成, 王刚. 多原发与单原发大肠腺癌的预后分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 407-412.
[13]	孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[14]	唐诗, 薛传优, 叶兴, 张鸿举, 戴瑞. 急性病毒性肝炎患者血脂、血糖、蛋白、尿酸变化特点及其与预后的关联[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 396-399.
[15]	郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease