切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.01.008

所属专题: 专题评论 总编推荐 文献

论著

慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试评分对预后的评估意义
王昌明1,(), 翁帮琼1, 魏卿2   
  1. 1. 611930 四川,四川省彭州市人民医院呼吸内科
    2. 611930 四川,四川省彭州市人民医院重症监护室
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-23 出版日期:2017-02-25
  • 通信作者: 王昌明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81300197)

Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Changming Wang1,(), Bangqiong Weng1, Qing Wei2   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory, Pengzhou People′s Hospital, Pengzhou, Sichuan 611930, China
  • Received:2016-02-23 Published:2017-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Changming Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Changming, Email:
引用本文:

王昌明, 翁帮琼, 魏卿. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试评分对预后的评估意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(01): 35-40.

Changming Wang, Bangqiong Weng, Qing Wei. Prognostic values of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(01): 35-40.

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评分与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者预后因素之间的相关性,明确CAT评分对COPD患者预后评估的应用价值。

方法

选取2013年1月至2015年1月我院呼吸内科住院及门诊就诊的106例COPD患者为研究对象。对106例患者治疗前后进行CAT评分、6 min步行实验(6MWD)、改良英国MRC呼吸困难指数(mMRC)、BODE(B为体质量指数,O为气道阻塞程度,D为呼吸困难分数,E为运动耐力)指数、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分及肺功能的测定。采用单因素线性相关分析CAT评分与患者各临床特征之间的相关性。

结果

随着CAT评分的升高,患者6MWD、用力呼气容积(FVC)实测值、FVC实测/预测值、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)实测值、FEV1实测/预测值、FEV1/FVC、呼气峰流速(PEF)实测值、PEF实测/预测值均明显降低(P<0.05),而mMRC评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分明显升高(P<0.05);患者经短期治疗后,CAT评分、BODE指数及SGRQ总评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),而6MWD、FEV1实测值、FEV1实测/预测值、FEV1/FVC则均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05);单因素相关分析发现,治疗前CAT评分与mMRC评分(r=0.254,P=0.018)、BODE指数(r=0.426,P=0.009)及SGRQ总评分(r=0.563,P=0.007)呈显著正相关,与6MWD(r=-0.387,P=0.008)、FVC实测值(r=-0.181,P=0.023)、FVC实测/预测值(r=-0.192,P=0.021)、FEV1实测值(r=-0.201,P=0.016)、FEV1实测/预测值(r=-0.214,P=0.013)及FEV1/FVC(r=-0.223,P=0.012)呈显著负相关;治疗后CAT评分与mMRC评分(r=0.304,P=0.011)、BODE指数(r=0.382,P=0.010)及SGRQ总评分(r=0.621,P=0.004)呈显著正相关,与6MWD(r=-0.407,P=0.007)、FEV1实测值(r=-0.211,P=0.014)、FEV1实测/预测值(r=-0.228,P=0.012)及FEV1/FVC(r=-0.231,P=0.011)呈显著负相关。

结论

CAT评分与COPD患者mMRC评分、BODE指数、SGRQ总评分、6MWD及肺功能指标均有较好的相关性,具有较好的预测COPD患者预后的应用价值。

Objective

To study the correlation between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score (CAT) and prognostic factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and explore the clinical application value of CAT in assessing the prognosis of patients with COPD.

Methods

Au 106 patients with diagnosed COPD in the department of resiratory of our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were enrolled in the study. The CAT score, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), modified medical British research council (mMRC), BODE index, St George′s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and pulmonary function indices were collected before and after treatment. The correlation between the CAT scores and clinical characteristics were analyzed by univariate linear correlation.

Results

With the CAT scores increased, the 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC) measured values, FVC observed/predicted value, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured values, FEV1 observed/predicted values, FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured values, PEF observed/predicted values were significantly lower (P<0.05), while mMRC score, BODE index and SGRQ total score were significantly higher (P<0.05); After the short-term treatment for patients, the CAT scores, BODE index and SGRQ total scores were significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), while 6MWD, FEV1 measured values, FEV1 observed/predicted values, FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05); The univariate analysis found that the CAT score in pre-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.254, P=0.018), BODE index (r=0.426, P=0.009) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.563, P=0.007), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.387, P=0.000), FVC measured values (r=-0.181, P=0.023), FVC observed/predicted value (r=-0.192, P=0.021), FEV1 measured values (r=-0.201, P=0.016), FEV1 observed/predicted values (r=-0.214, P=0.013) and FEV1/FVC (r=-0.223, P=0.012); the CAT score in post-treatment was positive correlated with mMRC scale (r=0.304, P=0.011), BODE index (r=0.382, P=0.010) and SGRQ total scores (r=0.621, P=0.004), which was negative correlated with 6MWD (r=-0.407, P=0.000), FEV1 measured values (r=-0.211, P=0.014), FEV1 observed/predicted values (r=-0.228, P=0.012) and FEV1/FVC (r=-0.231, P=0.011).

Conclusions

The CAT score has a good correlation with mMRC scale, BODE index, SGRQ, 6MWD and pulmonary function in COPD patients, suggesting which has a potential to predict the prognosis of COPD.

表1 不同CAT评分COPD患者的临床特征比较(±s)
表2 106例COPD患者治疗前后相关临床特征比较(±s)
表3 治疗前后COPD患者CAT评分与预后因素的相关性分析
1
任成山,钱桂生. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病机制研究现状与展望[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志:电子版,2009, 2(2): 104-115.
2
Cleutjens F, Triest F, Wilke S, et al. New insights in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidity[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 191(9): 1081-1082.
3
万敏,张巧,李莹,等. 首诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病认知情况调查[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2011, 33(23): 2527-2529.
4
吕青兰. 慢性心力衰竭合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者预后影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2013, 33(14): 3338-3339.
5
Minov J, Karadzinska-Bislimovska J, Vasilevska K, et al. Course of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores during bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated in outpatient setting[J]. Open Respir Med J, 2015, 9: 39-45.
6
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17.
7
Saglam M, Vardar-Yagli N, Savci S, et al. Functional capacity, physical activity, and quality of life in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 423-428.
8
蔡睿,侯刚,王秋月,等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试对生存质量的评估价值研究[J]. 中国实用内科杂志,2011, 31(11): 847-849.
9
Becker C, Schäfer J, Carvalho LL, et al. CAT correlates positively with respiratory rate and is a significant predictor of the impact of COPD on daily life of patients: a cross sectional study[J]. Multidiscip Respir Med, 2014, 9(1): 47.
10
Suetomo M, Kawayama T, Kinoshita T, et al. COPD assessment tests scores are associated with exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japanese patients[J]. Respir Investig, 2014, 52(5): 288-295.
11
尹慧,龙翔,宋卫东. 振动排痰对不同肺功能分级慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志:电子版,2014, 7(1): 66-67.
12
Papaioannou M, Pitsiou G, Manika K, et al. COPD assessment test: a simple tool to evaluate disease severity and response to treatment[J]. COPD, 2014, 11(5): 489-495.
13
Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Limsukon A, et al. Detection of acute deterioration in health status visit among COPD patients by monitoring COPD assessment test score[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2015, 10: 277-282.
14
Feliz-Rodriguez D, Zudaire S, Carpio C, et al. Evolution of the COPD Assessment Test score during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: determinants and prognostic value[J]. Can Respir J, 2013, 20(5): e92-e97.
15
Hoogendoorn M, Feenstra TL, Hoogenveen RT, et al. Association between lung function and exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD[J]. nt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2010, 5: 435-444.
16
Tantucci C, Modina D. Lung function decline in COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2012, 7: 95-99.
17
Kurzaj M, Wierzejski W, Dor A, et al. The impact of specialized physiotherapy methods on BODE index in COPD patients during hospitalization[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2013, 22(5): 721-730.
18
Araujo ZT, Holanda GDoes the BODE index correlate with quality of life in patients with COPD?[J]. J Bras Pneumol, 2010, 36(4): 447-452.
19
Lin YX, Xu WN, Liang LR, et al. The cross-sectional and longitudinal association of the BODE index with quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2009, 122(24): 2939-2944.
20
Tang CY, Taylor NF, Blackstock FC. Chest physiotherapy for patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review[J]. Physiotherapy, 2010, 96(1): 1-13.
21
Celli BR. Predictors of mortality in COPD[J]. Respir Med, 2010, 104(6): 773-779.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[10] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 王涛, 刘静, 高玉伟, 王兴华, 胡秀红, 崔红蕊, 徐保振, 杨洪娟. 抗生素耐药背景下中医药防治腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 340-344.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要