切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 450 -456. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.03.018

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

一线用药的EGFR抑制剂治疗临床选择型非小细胞肺癌有效性的系统评价
田春琴1,(), 赵新汉2, 耿会生3, 崔立春4, 王旋4, 杜建飞4   
  1. 1. 710061 西安,西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤科;710016 西安,国际合作长安医院肿瘤科
    2. 710061 西安,西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤科
    3. 710016 西安,国际合作长安医院放疗中心
    4. 710016 西安,国际合作长安医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-24 出版日期:2017-08-20
  • 通信作者: 田春琴

System evalution on effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy in treatment of clinical-selected non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Chunqin Tian1,(), Xinhan Zhao2, Huisheng Geng3, Lichun Cui4, Xuan Wang4, Jianfei Du4   

  1. 1. Oncology Department of Xi′an jiaotong university first affiliated hospital, xi an 710061 China; Oncology Department of the International cooperation Chang′an Hospital, Xi′an China 710016
    3. Radiotherapy Centre Department of the International cooperation Chang′an Hospital, xi′an 710016 China
    4. Oncology Department of the International cooperation Chang′an Hospital, Xi′an China 710016
  • Received:2016-06-24 Published:2017-08-20
  • Corresponding author: Chunqin Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Chunqin, Email:
引用本文:

田春琴, 赵新汉, 耿会生, 崔立春, 王旋, 杜建飞. 一线用药的EGFR抑制剂治疗临床选择型非小细胞肺癌有效性的系统评价[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(04): 450-456.

Chunqin Tian, Xinhan Zhao, Huisheng Geng, Lichun Cui, Xuan Wang, Jianfei Du. System evalution on effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy in treatment of clinical-selected non-small-cell lung carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(04): 450-456.

目的

系统评价并对比表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)与化疗对一线治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者的疗效。

方法

自PubMed、Cochrane library、EMBASE中检索相关的主题词及自由词,收集EGFR-TKIs与化疗相比一线治疗临床选择型NSCLC疗效的随机对照研究文献(randomized controlled trials, RCT)。按纳入标准及排除标准筛选文献,采用cochrane偏倚风险评估表对纳入文献进行质量评价,自纳入文献中提取有效数据,应用RevMan 5.3.5和STATA 12.0分析并对比临床选择型NSCLC患者在EGFR-TKIs治疗中的疗效。采用敏感性分析和发表偏倚分析评价结果的稳定性和可靠性。

结果

共纳入5篇RCT文献,共1 719例患者,Meta分析结果显示:对于临床选择型(亚裔、腺癌、不吸烟)的NSCLC患者:一线EGFR-TKIs(吉非替尼)治疗与化疗相比,总生存期(overall survival, OS)、无进展生存期(progress free survival, PFS)、相对危险度(risk ratio, RR)无明显差异;EGFR-TKIs联合化疗的一线治疗与单纯化疗相比,OS、PFS、RR无明显差异。

结论

对比化疗,选择型NSCLC患者一线EGFR-TKIs治疗无获益。

Objective

To analyze the effectiveness of epithelial growth factor receptor-TKIs(EGFR-TKIs) compared with chemotherapy on the clinical-selected patients.

Method

Randomized controlled trials(RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy as first line treatment of the clinical-selected NSCLC were obtained from PubMed, the Cochrane library and EMBASE. All literatures were assessed by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment and data abstraction. The Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3.5 (Cochrane Collaboration) and STATA 12.0 (STATA Corp, College station, TX) software and was contrasted in EGFR TKIs-treatment of the clinical-selected NSCLC patients curative effect. The stability and reliability were evaluated by sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis.

Results

A total of 5 trials with 1 719 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The RR, PFS and OS of clinical-selected NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs alone or EGFR-TKIs in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy didn′t significantly increased compared with that of the patients treated with chemotherapy.

Conclusion

EGFR-TKIs therapy as first-line treatment was not suit for clinical-selected NSCLC patients.

图1 检索流程
表1 纳入Meta分析的2项研究的基本资料
表2 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂对比化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者的方法学偏倚
图2 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂对比化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者总体生存期的森林图
表3 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者RCT基线资料
表4 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者RCT的方法学偏倚
图3 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者无进展生存期的森林图
图4 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者总体生存期的森林图
图5 作为一线用药的EGFR抑制剂联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗临床选择型NSCLC患者客观反应率的森林图
1
钱桂生. 肺癌不同病理类型发病率的变化情况及原因[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(1): 1-6.
2
杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,等. 中国肺癌死亡趋势分析及发病、死亡的估计与预测[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2005, 8(4): 274-278.
3
Han JY, Park K, Kim SW, et al. First-SIGNAL: first-line single-agent iressa versus gemcitabine and cisplatin trial in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30 (10): 1122-1128.
4
Fukuoka M, Wu YL, ThongprasertS, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase Ⅲ,randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(21): 2866-2874.
5
Michael M, White SC, Abdi E, et al. Multicenter randomized, open-label phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS two patients with advanced NSCLC[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 2015, 11(1): 4-14.
6
Liang J, Ahn M, Kang J, et al. First-line treatment (txt) with pemetrexed-cisplatin (PC), followed sequentially by gefitinib (G) or pemetrexed, in Asian, never-smoker (n/smkr) patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC: An open-label, randomized phase Ⅱ trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28, 7591.
7
Choi YJ, Kim SW, Lee DH, et al. Paclitaxel/carboplatin (pc) intercalated with gefiinib or paclitaxel/carboplatin (pc) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) in selected population who were smoker or wild-type EGFR: randomized phase ii study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(15):e19079.
8
Arteaga CL. ErbB-targeted therapeutic approaches in human cancer[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2003, 284(1): 122- 130.
9
Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 50(21): 2129-2139.
10
Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5676): 1497-1500.
11
Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications[J]. Cancer Res, 2004, 64(24): 8919-8923.
12
Rizvi NA, Rusch V, Pao W, et al. Molecular characteristics predict clinical outcomes: prospective trial correlating response to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib with the presence of sensitizing mutations in the tyrosine binding domain of the EGFR gene[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2011, 17(10): 3500-3506.
13
Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(10): 981-988.
14
Kris MG, Johnson BE, Berry LD, et al. Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(19): 1998-2006.
[1] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[2] 王雪菲, 海琳悦, 李立方, 肖春花. Luminal A型乳腺癌的内分泌治疗与化疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 294-300.
[3] 杨薇, 郝霞, 朱冬振, 张劲柏, 田雪飞, 姚斌. 中医药治疗烧烫伤患者临床效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 419-426.
[4] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 燕速. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫指征与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 480-484.
[9] 汪洋, 李志鹏, 王可兵. 上尿路尿路上皮癌术后预防性膀胱灌注化疗的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 649-652.
[10] 刘恒, 侯宇川. 膀胱癌新型灌注药物的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 445-451.
[11] 黄承路, 廖飞, 刘显平, 王志强. 血清外泌体Has_circ_0060937过度表达与NSCLC转移和不良预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 490-494.
[12] 高加林, 曹亚娟. 腹腔镜解剖性肝右后叶切除治疗食管癌根治术后孤立性肝转移[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 239-242.
[13] 吴晨瑞, 廖锐, 贺强, 潘龙, 黄平, 曹洪祥, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄俊杰, 孙睿锐. MDT模式下肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗肝细胞癌多处转移一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 713-716.
[14] 李斌奎. 不可切除肝内胆管细胞癌的转化治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 511-516.
[15] 牛文博, 吴凤鹏, 刘月平, 周超熙, 张娟, 胡旭华, 李保坤, 王贵英. 新辅助放化疗对局部进展期直肠癌疗效及肿瘤免疫微环境变化的研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要