切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 543 -548. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2017.05.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变的检测与分子靶向治疗
方平1,(), 王沣1, 江富来1, 林琳1, 赵铁1   
  1. 1. 244002 铜陵,铜陵人民医院呼吸内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-22 出版日期:2017-10-20
  • 通信作者: 方平
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省铜陵市卫生局科研基金(卫科研(2014)10)

Detection of EGFR mutations in non small cell lung cancer and molecular targeted therapy

Ping Fang1,(), Feng Wang1, Fulai Jiang1, Lin Lin1, Tie Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory Disease, Tongling People′s Hospital, Tongling 244002, China
  • Received:2017-01-22 Published:2017-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Ping Fang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fang Ping, Email:
引用本文:

方平, 王沣, 江富来, 林琳, 赵铁. 非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变的检测与分子靶向治疗[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(05): 543-548.

Ping Fang, Feng Wang, Fulai Jiang, Lin Lin, Tie Zhao. Detection of EGFR mutations in non small cell lung cancer and molecular targeted therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(05): 543-548.

目的

探讨非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变率和突变类型,分析其临床特征,并观察EGFR突变与表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)治疗疗效的相关性。

方法

收集203例非小细胞肺癌患者外科手术、淋巴结活检、经皮肺穿刺活检、气管镜活检和胸腔积液沉渣石蜡标本,应用ADx-ARMS法进行EGFR基因突变检测,分析基因的突变率及其与临床特征的关系;观察非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)接受EGFR-TKIs治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。应用SPSS23.0软件进行统计学分析,计数资料比较采用χ2检验,采用Kaplan-Meier法计算患者的PFS,采用Log-Rank检验分析各种因素对生存期的影响。

结果

203例NSCLC患者,男性116例,女性87例,年龄为25~82岁。吸烟指数≥400支/者61例,小于400支/年和不吸烟者142例,腺癌152例,鳞癌21例,腺鳞癌14例,其他NSCLC16例。203例NSCLC患者EGFR总突变率为51.2%(104/203),包括19外显子缺失突变51例(49.0%),21外显子L858R突变44例(42.3%),19del及L858R总突变率占所有突变的96.1%,18外显子G719X点突变3例(2.9%),19del+L858R双突变3例(2.9%),1例20ins,2例T790M突变分别为1例19del+T790M和1例L858R+T790M。EGFR基因阳性突变率女性组高于男性组(66.7% vs. 36.2%);非吸烟组高于吸烟组(63.4% vs. 16.4%);腺癌组高于鳞癌组(53.3% vs. 33.3%),P<0.05。而EGFR基因突变状况与标本类型如手术、淋巴结活检、肺穿刺活检、气管镜活检和胸腔积液沉渣标本间无统计学差异,P=0.418。101例接受TKI治疗的NSCLC患者客观缓解率(ORR)为61.4%,疾病控制率(DCR)为71.3%,中位疾病无进展生存期(PFS)为10个月。其中EGFR突变阳性患者接受EGFR-TKIs治疗的ORR及DCR均要显著高于EGFR突变阴性及EGFR突变状态未明确人群(88.6% vs. 16.7% vs. 43.1%,P=0.000;95.5% vs. 16.7% vs. 56.9%,P=0.000)。EGFR突变阳性患者接受EGFR-TKIs治疗的中位PFS较EGFR突变阴性及EGFR突变状态未明确患者延长,有统计学差异(P=0.001)。进一步分析EGFR突变阳性19del组NSCLC患者ORR、DCR均高于L858R组(91.2% vs. 85%,P=0.646;100% vs. 90%,P=0.201);19del组NSCLC患者TKI治疗后中位PFS 14.5个月较L858R组10个月长,有统计学差异(P=0.010)。

结论

非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR突变高,以女性、不吸烟、腺癌为优势人群,EGFR敏感突变阳性者对EGFR-TKI疗效好,EGFR突变中19del者较L858R疗效更佳,基因检测结果可以较好地预测分子靶向药物的疗效,降低肿瘤进展的风险。

Objective

To detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and to study the relationship between EGFR mutation and clinical features, pathological features, the therapy efficacy.

Methods

Collect 203 NSCLC patients, specimens, including surgical specimen, lymph node tissues, transthoracic needle biopsyspecimen, bronchoscopy biopsy specimen and pleural effusion cells specimen. EGFR mutations in 203 NSCLC were analyzed by ADx-AMRS assay. The relationship between the muta-tions and the clinicopathologic features was further evaluated. And observed the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. SPSS23.0 software was used for statistical analysis, the data were compared with chi square test, PFS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method, and the influence of various factors on survival was analyzed by Log-rank test.

Results

The age of 203 NSCLC patients, inluding 116 male and 87 female, was range 25 years to 82 years. Smoking index was greater than or equal to 400 in 61 cases, less than 400 in 142 cases.The pathological characteristics of 203 cases were different, ininluding 152 cases of adenocarcinoma, 21 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 14 cases of adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma, and other NSCLC 16 cases. The EGFR mutation rate of 203 cases in patients with NSCLC was 51.2% (104/203), including 51 deletions in exon 19(49.0%), 44 cases of exon 21 mutation, 3 cases of exon 18 mutation(2.9%), 1 case of exon 20 mutation, 3 exon 19/21 double mutation(2.9%), 1 case of 19del/T790M and 1 case of L858R/T790M. The mutation rate of 19del and L858R were higher 96.1% in 104 cases. The mutation rates of EGFR were higher in females than those in males(66.7% vs. 36.2%); Non smoking group EGFR mutation rate was higher than that in the smoking group(63.4% vs. 16.4%); EGFR mutation rate of patients, with lung adenocarcinoma was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma(53.3% vs. 33.3%), P<0.05. Conversely, between EGFR gene mutation status and specimen type, including surgicai specimen, lymph node biopsy, lung biopsy, bronchoscopy, and pleural effusions, was no significant statistical difference (P=0.418 ). The objective response rate (ORR) to first-line TKI treatment of 101 patients was 61.4%. The disease control rate (DCR) was 71.3%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months. The ORR and DCR to EGFR-TKIs therapy of patients with EGFR mutation were significantly higher than those of patients with EGFR mutation/ undefined EGFR mutation (88.6% vs. 16.7% vs. 43.1%, P=0.000; 95.5% vs. 16.7% vs. 56.9%, P=0.000); the median PFS was also significantly longer (P=0.001). Furthermore, the ORR and DCR in 19-del group were higher than that of group L858R (91.2% vs. 85%, P=0.646 100%; vs. 90%, P=0.201); Patients with NSCLC in after TKI treatment, the median PFS was 14.5 months compared with 10 months in the L858R group, there were significant differences (P=0.010).

Conclusion

EGFR mutation rate was higher in NSCLC with the advantages of female, non smoking and adenocarcinoma. EGFR mutation detection can better predict the efficacy of molecular targeted drugs and reduce the risk of tumor progression, especialli in 19-del or L858R mutation.

表1 104例EGFR突变类型分布
表2 EGFR基因突变相关因素
图1 不同EGFR突变状态NSCLC患者TKI治疗后PFS差异
图2 EGFR 19del和L858R基因突变NSCLC患者TKI治疗后PFS差异
表3 101例NSCLC患者TKI治疗疗效[n(%)]
表4 101例接受TKI治疗的患者EGFR突变特征与ORR/DCR/PFS的关系
1
钱桂生. 肺癌不同病理类型发病率的变化情况及其原因[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(1): 1-6.
2
Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, et al. Epidemiology of lung cancer in China[J]. Thoracic Cancer, 2015, 6(2): 209-215.
3
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
4
Patel JD, Krilov L, Adams S, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2013: annual report on progress against cancer from the American society of clinical oncology[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(2):129-160.
5
Morita S, Okamoto I, Kobayashi K, et al. Combined survival analysis of prospective clinical trials of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15(13): 4493-4498.
6
Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(25): 2385-2394.
7
Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012,13(3): 239-246.
8
Bordi P, Del Re M, Danesi R, et al. Circulating DNA in diagnosis and monitoring EGFR gene mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2015, 4(5): 584-597.
9
Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cance:role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors[J]. Oncogene, 2009, Suppl 1: S24-S31.
10
Xu Q, Zhu Y, Bai Y, et al. Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung cancer by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2015, 22(8): 1533-1541.
11
Won JK, Keam B, Koh J, et al. Concomitant ALK translocation and EGFR mutation in lung cancer: a comparison of direct sequencing and sensitive assays and the impact on responsiveness to tyrosine kinase inhibitor[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(2): 348-354.
12
杨宁,郭妹,宋玉兰,等. 430例中国非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR、KRAS、BRAF和PIK3CA基因突变状态及其临床意义[J]. 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2015, 22(6): 734-739.
13
许春伟,王海艳,吴永芳,等. 2771例肺肿瘤临床病理特征分析临床与病理杂志[J]. 临床与病理杂志,2016, 36(2): 173-184.
14
Jürgens J, Engel-Riedel W, Prickartz A, et al. Combined point mutation in KRAS or EGFR genes and EML4-ALK translocation in lung cancer patients[J]. Future Oncol, 2014, 10(4): 529-532.
15
Kim HR, Ahn JR, Lee JG, et al. The impact of cigarette smoking on the frequency of and qualitative differences in KRAS mutations in Korean patients with lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2013, 54(4): 865-874.
16
Jürgens J, Engel-Riedel W, Prickartz A, et al. Combined point mutation in KRAS or EGFR genes and EML4-ALK translocation in lung cancer patients[J]. Future Oncol, 2014, 10(4): 529-532.
17
Yang JJ, Zhang XC, Su J, et al. Lung cancers with concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements: diverse responses to EGFR-TKI and crizotinib in relation to diverse receptors phosphorylation[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2014, 20(5): 1383-1392.
18
Riely GJ, Yu HA. EGFR: The paradigm of an oncogene-driven lung cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2015, 21(10): 2221-2226.
19
Janne PA, Yang JC, Kim DW, et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(18): 1689-1699.
20
Yu HA, Arcila ME, Hellmann MD, et al. Poor response to erlotinib in patients with tumors containing baseline EGFR T790M mutations found by routine clinical molecular testing[J]. Ann Oncol, 2014, 25(2): 423-428.
21
Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2011, 3(75): 75ra26.
22
Jänne PA, Yang JC, Kim DW, et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(18): 1689-1699.
[1] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[2] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[3] 王璐, 樊杨. 子宫内膜癌相关生物标志物研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[4] 闫甲, 刘双池, 王政宇. 胆囊癌肿瘤标志物的研究和应用进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 391-394.
[5] 曹长青, 郭新艳, 高源, 张存, 唐海利, 樊东, 杨小军, 张松, 赵华栋. 肿瘤微环境参与介导HER2阳性乳腺癌曲妥珠单抗耐药的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-95.
[6] 黄承路, 廖飞, 刘显平, 王志强. 血清外泌体Has_circ_0060937过度表达与NSCLC转移和不良预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 490-494.
[7] 陈坤, 何傅梅, 方婷, 陈文瑞. 血清sCD73与EGFR/ALK野生型非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗效果的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 504-507.
[8] 朱超男, 王帅, 王文博, 郑贸根, 程远, 陈志全. 非小细胞肺癌患者组织miR-31-5p表达与临床病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 508-510.
[9] 徐天亮, 程干思, 吴亚平, 龚荣, 胡洁, 段群娣, 李承慧. 奥希替尼联合安罗替尼二线治疗转移性NSCLC的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 520-522.
[10] 魏婷婷, 胡小红, 龚自强, 熊鹿. 老年非小细胞肺癌组织ARPC2表达及与预后关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 584-586.
[11] 杜静怡, 徐兴祥. 循环肿瘤细胞在非小细胞肺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 596-600.
[12] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[13] 吴晨瑞, 廖锐, 贺强, 潘龙, 黄平, 曹洪祥, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄俊杰, 孙睿锐. MDT模式下肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗肝细胞癌多处转移一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 713-716.
[14] 吴寅, 陈智琴, 高勇, 权明. Her-2阳性结直肠癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 420-425.
[15] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要