切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 338 -340. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2021.03.019

临床研究

NLR、PLR、hs-CRP预测ICU重症肺炎死亡风险
罗冰燕1, 刘伟洪1, 张晓亮1, 陈惠峰1   
  1. 1. 516211 惠州,广东省惠州市第六人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-19 出版日期:2021-06-25

Prediction of the risk of death in patients with severe pneumonia in ICUby NLR, PLR, hs-CRP

Bingyan Luo1, Weihong Liu1, Xiaoliang Zhang1   

  • Received:2020-12-19 Published:2021-06-25
引用本文:

罗冰燕, 刘伟洪, 张晓亮, 陈惠峰. NLR、PLR、hs-CRP预测ICU重症肺炎死亡风险[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 338-340.

Bingyan Luo, Weihong Liu, Xiaoliang Zhang. Prediction of the risk of death in patients with severe pneumonia in ICUby NLR, PLR, hs-CRP[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(03): 338-340.

目的

探讨血清中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)联合检测对重症监护病房(ICU)重症肺炎28 d死亡风险预测价值。

方法

选择2018年2月至2020年10月我院收治的116例入住ICU重症肺炎患者,统计28 d死亡情况,分为死亡组和存活组,对比临床资料。Logistic多因素回归分析影响ICU重症肺炎死亡的因素。制作受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),分析联合检测血清NLR、PLR、hs-CRP对ICU重症肺炎28 d死亡的预测价值。

结果

ICU重症肺炎患者28 d病死率为30.17%(35/116)。死亡组患者入住ICU时间、机械通气占比、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、肺炎严重程度(PSI)评分、C反应蛋白、白细胞计数(WBC)、血清NLR、PLR及hs-CRP水平均显著高于存活组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,PSI评分、血清NLR、PLR及hs-CRP均为影响ICU重症肺炎患者死亡的因素(OR=3.827、4.354、3.327、2.765,P<0.05)。

结论

血清NLR、PLR、hs-CRP三者联合对ICU重症肺炎患者28 d死亡的预测效能较高,可作为评ICU重症肺炎患者28 d预后死亡的参考指标。

表1 死亡组和存活组患者临床资料对比(±s)
表2 影响ICU重症肺炎死亡的多因素分析Logistic回归分析
1
Mizgerd JP. Pathogenesis of severe pneumonia: advances and knowledge gaps[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2017, 23(3): 193-197.
2
Panigada M, Bottino N, Tagliabue P, et al. Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: a report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2020, 18(7): 1738-1742.
3
Spiezia L, Boscolo A, Poletto F, et al. COVID-19-related severe hypercoagulability in patients admitted to intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2020, 120(6): 998-1000.
4
Karasahin O, Tasar PT, Timur O, et al. The value of C-reactive protein in infection diagnosis and prognosis in elderly patients[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2018, 30(6): 555-562.
5
Choi JJ, McCarthy MW. Novel applications for serum procalcitonin testing in clinical practice[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2018, 18(1): 27-34.
6
李 萌,姚 莉,王 菁,等. NLR PLR在评估重症肺炎患者预后中的价值[J]. 安徽医学,2020, 41(4): 106-109.
7
Cai Z, He W, Zhuang FJ, et al. The role of high high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at admission on poor prognosis after acute ischemic stroke[J]. Int J Neurosci, 2019, 129(5): 423-429.
8
中国医师协会急诊医师分会. 中国急诊重症肺炎临床实践专家共识[J]. 中国急救医学,2016, 36(2): 97-107.
9
Gilani MT, Razavi M, Azad AM. A comparison of simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅲ scoring system in predicting mortality and length of stay at surgical intensive care unit[J]. Niger Med J, 2014, 55(2): 144-147.
10
Heppner HJ, Sehlhoff B, Niklaus D, et al. Pneumonia severity index (PSI), CURB-65, and mortality in hospitalized elderly patients with aspiration pneumonia[J]. Z Gerontol Geriatr, 2011, 44(4): 229-234.
11
Klopfenstein T, Zayet S, Lohse A, et al. Tocilizumab therapy reduced intensive care unit admissions and/or mortality in COVID-19 patients[J]. Med Mal Infect, 2020, 50(5): 397-400.
12
Chahin A, Opal SM. Severe pneumonia caused by legionella pneumophila:differential diagnosis and therapeutic considerations[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2017, 31(1): 111-121.
13
Spiezia L, Boscolo A, Poletto F, et al. COVID-19-related severe hypercoagulability in patients admitted to intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2020, 120(6): 998-1000.
14
梁 欢,高 烨,苗常青,等. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对重症肺炎患者28 d死亡风险的预测价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2019, 31(7): 827-831.
15
Lagunas-Rangel FA. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(10): 1733-1734.
16
Zhou Y, Guo S, He Y, et al. COVID-19 is distinct from sars-cov-2-negative community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2020, 10: 322.
17
Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, et al. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2020, 84(12): 106-112.
18
Qu R, Ling Y, Zhang YH, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease-19[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(9): 1533-1541.
19
Liu Y, Du X, Chen J, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19[J]. J Infect, 2020, 81(1): e6-e12.
20
Seyit M, Avci E, Nar R, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio to predict the severity of COVID-19[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2021, 40(15): 110-114.
21
Ge YL, Liu CH, Xu J, et al. Serum high-sensitivity c reactive protein improves sensitivity of curb-65 in predicting icu admission and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia patients[J]. Clin Lab, 2018, 64(10): 1749-1754.
22
Nam KW, Kim TJ, Lee JS, et al. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts stroke-associated pneumonia[J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(8): 1886-1892.
23
Lee JH, Song S, Yoon SY, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio as diagnostic markers for pneumonia severity[J]. Br J Biomed Sci, 2016, 73(3): 140-142.
24
Wang C, Deng R, Gou L, et al. Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using combined hematology parameters[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(9): 593.
25
姜迎厚,王 瑛,韩云宏,等. NLR评估老年重症肺炎严重程度及预后的价值[J]. 临床肺科杂志,2018, 23(12): 2170-2174.
26
Kartal O, Kartal AT. Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios in pneumonia[J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2017, 118(9): 513-516.
27
Neeser OL, Vukajlovic T, Felder L, et al. A high C-reactive protein/ procalcitonin ratio predicts Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2019, 57(10): 1638-1646.
28
Paul SP, De Aguiar A, Barnden J, et al. Outcomes of very high C-reactive protein levels in paediatric practice[J]. Br J Nurs, 2018, 27(1): 51.
29
Ali A, Abbasi AS, Amjad T, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein as marker of acute versus chronic medical conditions[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2019, 31(1): 39-45.
30
周 燕. 重症肺部感染患者机械通气前后hs-CRP,PCT的变化情况及其与患者预后的关系分析[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床,2018, 25(2): 215-219+223.
[1] 张蒙, 徐林林, 王燕, 李玉峰, 王洁琼. 基于屈布勒-罗斯理论的心理管理对重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患者的干预作用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 43-47.
[2] 刘立, 陈诚, 李新科, 刘凯, 屠昌明. 血清IL-6、hs-CRP、MMP-9联合检测在腹股沟疝无张力修补术预后评价中的价值分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 405-409.
[3] 李海明, 刘鸿飞, 李俊. 血清脂蛋白酶水平与COPD患者骨骼肌质量减少的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 500-503.
[4] 芦丹, 杨硕, 刘旭. VEGF、HMGB1、hs-CRP/Alb在AECOPD伴呼吸衰竭中的变化及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 532-534.
[5] 盛名, 王敬文, 郭爽, 万文蕾. 重症肺炎NT-proBNP动态演变与患者预后风险的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 379-381.
[6] 赵明丽, 廖敏, 王玉忠. 重症肺炎患者乳酸脱氢酶、载脂蛋白A1、铁蛋白水平与病情的关系及预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 233-235.
[7] 胡中英, 仇海兵, 孙艳. 莫西沙星联合亚胺培南西司他丁对重症肺炎的疗效及对炎症指标的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 209-211.
[8] 周旻忞, 张恒喜, 冯华, 施林燕. 超声膈肌功能评估对重症肺炎伴呼吸衰竭患者机械通气撤机的指导意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 98-100.
[9] 崔立慧, 李士荣, 李素娟, 孙娴静, 张馨怡. 糖尿病患者肺部感染超敏C反应蛋白和降钙素原检测的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 95-97.
[10] 杨荣, 李院玲. 美罗培南联合参麦注射液治疗重症肺炎疗效及对心肌的保护作用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 866-869.
[11] 崔鑫, 牛俊, 孙鑫, 李文, 徐心坦. 重症肺炎支原体肺炎患儿血清sTREM-1和SP-D的变化及意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 863-865.
[12] 夏普开提·甫拉提, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩, 姚刚. 术前血小板与淋巴细胞比值对肝切除术后肝衰竭的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 289-293.
[13] 葛杰, Mali Niroj, 陈广梅, 樊文星, 何佳敏, 曹玲艳. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与维持性血液透析患者透析充分性的相关性分析[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 327-331.
[14] 邱学荣, 张秀琴, 张欢, 刘婷, 高翠琴. 动态监测SAA给予抗生素在电子支气管镜联合普米克令舒治疗重症肺炎中的价值研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 308-313.
[15] 陈丽娜, 虞意华, 徐靓, 龚仕金, 汪月奔. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和C反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比值对老年脓毒症患者28天病死率的预测价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 28-32.
阅读次数
全文


摘要