切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版)

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 411 -415. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.03.013

论著

作业疗法在非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复中应用分析
白丽丽1, 江榆2,†(), 黄亮亮3, 白莹1, 张敏1   
  1. 1. 716000　延安，延安市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科
    2. 719000　榆林，榆林市中医医院肝病科
    3. 716000　延安，延安市人民医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-13 出版日期:2024-06-25
  • 通信作者: 江榆
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技厅的项目(2018JQ3073)

Application of occupational therapy in postoperative rehabilitation of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Lili Bai1, Yu Jiang2,†(), Liangliang Huang3, Ying BAI1, Min Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Yan′an People′s Hospital, Yan′an, Shaanxi 716000
    2. Department of Hepatology, Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanxi Yulin 719000
    3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yan′an People′s Hospital, Yan′an, Shaanxi 716000
  • Received:2024-03-13 Published:2024-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Yu Jiang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

白丽丽, 江榆, 黄亮亮, 白莹, 张敏. 作业疗法在非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复中应用分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 411-415.

Lili Bai, Yu Jiang, Liangliang Huang, Ying BAI, Min Zhang. Application of occupational therapy in postoperative rehabilitation of patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(03): 411-415.

目的

分析作业疗法对非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)术后康复的临床疗效。

方法

选择2022年11月至2023年11月我院收治的62例NSCLC患者，术后采取常规肺功能康复训练为对照组30例，在对照组基础上采用作业疗法为观察组32例。检测两组治疗前后用力肺活量(the forced vital capacity, FVC)、呼气高峰流量(peak expiratory flow, PEF)、最大通气量(maximal voluntary ventilation, MVV)等肺功能情况；检测6 min步行距离(6-minute walk distance, 6MWD)；采用日常生活活动量表(activity of daily living, ADL)判断两组生活能力；统计两组健康行为达标率；采用肺癌患者生活质量测定量表(functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung, FACT-L)评价两组治疗前后生活质量。

结果

观察组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后FVC分别为(1.34±0.19)L、(1.82±0.21)L、(2.36±0.24)L，对照组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后FVC分别为(1.33±0.18)L、(1.39±0.25)L、(1.83±0.22)L，观察组FVC高于对照组(P<0.05)；观察组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后PEF分别为(165.28±33.07)L/min 、(195.30±31.27)L/min 、(230.64±38.18)L/min ，对照组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后PEF分别为(163.90±30.25)L/min 、(170.25±29.53)L/min 、(194.48±35.03)L/min ，观察组PEF高于对照组(P<0.05)；观察组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后MVV分别为(47.19±9.92)L、(58.43±10.35)L、(68.19±13.05)L，对照组治疗前、治疗2个月后、治疗3个月后MVV分别为(46.02±8.36)L、(50.21±9.27)L、(58.34±11.14)L，观察组MVV高于对照组(P<0.05)；观察组治疗后6MWD(438.83±38.22)m高于对照组(389.36±36.24)m(P<0.05)；观察组治疗后ADL评分(63.65±2.94)分高于对照组(59.83±2.15)分(P<0.05)；观察组治疗后健康行为达标率规范饮食81.25%、适宜运动87.50%、遵医用药84.38%、定期复查90.63%和睡眠休息84.38%高于对照组(63.33%、73.33%、66.67%、76.67%、66.67%)(P<0.05)；观察组治疗后FACT-L评分较对照组改善(P<0.05)。

结论

作业疗法可有效提高NSCLC患者术后肺功能康复训练效果，改善生活质量具有临床意义。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 作业疗法, 功能障碍, 康复医学
Objective

To retrospectively analyze the effect of occupational therapy on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 62 patients with NSCLC admitted to our hospital from November 2022 to November 2023 were selected. Among them, 30 patients were treated with routine pulmonary function rehabilitation training after surgery as the control group, and 32 patients were treated with occupational therapy for 3 months on the basis of that as the observation group. The pulmonary function such as forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and maximum ventilation (MVV) were detected before and after treatment in the two groups. The 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) was measured. The activities of daily living scale (ADL) was used to evaluate the living ability of the two groups. The compliance rate of health behavior of the two groups was counted. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) was used to evaluate the quality of life of the two groups before and after treatment.

Result

The FVC of the observation group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (1.34±0.19) L, (1.82±0.21) L and (2.36±0.24)L, respectively. The FVC of the control group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (1.33±0.18)L, (1.39±0.25) L and (1.83±0.22) L, respectively. The FVC of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The PEF of the observation group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (165.28±33.07) L/min, (195.30±31.27) L/min and (230.64±38.18) L/min, respectively. The PEF of the control group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (163.90±30.25) L/min, (170.25±29.53) L/min and (194.48±35.03) L/min, respectively. The PEF of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The MVV of the observation group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (47.19±9.92) L, (58.43±10.35) L and (68.19±13.05) L, respectively. The MVV of the control group before treatment, 2 months after treatment and 3 months after treatment were (46.02±8.36) L, (50.21±9.27) L and (58.34±11.14) L, respectively. The MVV of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the 6MWD of the observation group (438.83±38.22) m was significantly higher than that of the control group (389.36±36.24) m(P<0.05); After treatment, the ADL score of the observation group (63.65±2.94) was significantly higher than that of the control group (59.83±2.15), P<0.05; After treatment, the compliance rate of health behavior in the observation group (81.25%, 87.50%, 84.38%, 90.63%, 84.38%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (63.33%, 73.33%, 66.67%, 76.67%, 66.67%), P<0.05. After treatment, the FACT-L score of the observation group was significantly improved compared with the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Occupational therapy can effectively improve the effect of postoperative pulmonary function rehabilitation training in patients with NSCLC and improve the quality of life of patients, which has certain clinical promotion value.

Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Occupational therapy, Dysfunction, Rehabilitation medicine
表1 两组NSCLC患者临床资料比较[n(%)，(±s)]
临床资料 观察组(n＝32) 对照组(n＝30) t/χ2 P值
性别     0.053 0.818
男 18(56.25) 16(53.33)    
女 14(43.75) 14(46.67)    
年龄(岁) 56.26±11.89 58.09±12.61 0.739 0.524
体重质量指数(kg/m2) 22.43±2.94 22.17±3.02 0.942 0.371
手术切除部位     0.827 0.843
上叶 15(46.87) 13(43.33)    
中叶 3(9.38) 2(6.67)    
下叶 11(34.38) 10(33.33)    
部分楔形切除 3(9.37) 5(16.67)    
病理类型     0.046 0.830
鳞癌 6(18.75) 5(16.67)    
腺癌 26(81.25) 25(83.33)    
TNM分期     0.176 0.916
Ⅰ 13(40.63) 12(40.00)    
Ⅱ 16(50.00) 16(53.33)    
Ⅲ 3(9.37) 2(6.67)    
表2 两组NSCLC患者治疗前后肺功能比较(±s)
组　别 治疗前后 FVC(L) PEF(L/min) MVV(L)
观察组 治疗前 1.34±0.19 165.28±33.07 47.19±9.92
  治疗2个月 1.82±0.21a 195.30±31.27a 58.43±10.35a
  治疗3个月 2.36±0.24a 230.64±38.18a 68.19±13.05a
对照组 治疗前 1.33±0.18 163.90±30.25 46.02±8.36
  治疗2个月 1.39±0.25a 170.25±29.53a 50.21±9.27a
  治疗3个月 1.83±0.22a 194.48±35.03a 58.34±11.14a
F时间   9.815 11.489 8.334
F交互   31.060 42.722 63.519
F组间   11.237 14.312 18.115
P值   0.000 0.000 0.000
表3 两组NSCLC患者治疗前后6MWD比较[(±s)，m]
治疗前后 观察组(n＝32) 对照组(n＝30) t值 P值
治疗前 275.34±20.19 271.37±19.18 0.335 0.439
治疗2个月后 378.33±32.25a 330.82±28.21a 4.198 0.028
治疗3个月后 438.83±38.22a 389.36±36.24a 6.301 0.009
表4 两组NSCLC患者健康行为达标率比较[n(%)]
组　别 例数 规范饮食 适宜运动 遵医用药 定期复查 睡眠休息
观察组 32 26(81.25) 28(87.50) 27(84.38) 29(90.63) 27(84.38)
对照组 30 19(63.33) 22(73.33) 20(66.67) 23(76.67) 20(66.67)
χ2值   4.758 4.026 6.269 4.614 5.151
P值   0.029 0.045 0.012 0.032 0.023
表5 两组NSCLC患者治疗前后FACT-L 4.0评分比较(±s)
组　别 例数 生理状况 社会家庭状况 情感状况 功能状况
治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
观察组 32 18.12±3.48 9.76±2.42a 9.09±1.94 22.93±3.97a 16.44±1.93 9.15±2.18a 10.02±1.73 22.32±2.34a
对照组 30 17.01±3.19 12.15±2.61a 8.10±1.83 18.24±3.11a 17.02±2.26 11.98±2.06a 9.43±2.07 19.17±2.06a
t值   0.519 4.281 0.602 7.092 0.566 4.320 1.059 5.014
P值   0.604 0.005 0.597 0.000 0.601 0.004 0.063 0.002
1
Lozano MD, Argueta A, de Andrea C. Immunotherapy and lung cytopathology: Overview and possibilities[J]. Cytopathology, 2024, 35(2): 213-217.
2
Mourino N, Varela-Lema L, Ruano-Ravina A, et al. Occupational exposure to endotoxins and small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev, 2024, 27(3): 91-105.
3
Zhu L, Gao R, Li H, et al. Are immune checkpoint inhibitors safe and effective in lung cancer patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease？[J]. Immunotherapy, 2024, 16(7): 465-480.
4
吴国明，钱桂生. 非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗研究进展及新理念[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版)，2019，12(4) ：405－408.
5
Huang Z, Xiao Z, Yu L, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages in non-small-cell lung cancer: from treatment resistance mechanisms to therapeutic targets[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2024: 104284.
6
Sharma VS, Yadav V. Effect of prehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy: A review [J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(12): e49940.
7
Voorn MJJ, Driessen EJM, Reinders R, et al. Effects of exercise prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation on health-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery: A systematic review[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2023, 49(10): 106909.
8
Reid H, Hocking C, Smythe E. Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity[J]. Scand J Occup Ther, 2024, 31(1): 2306585.
9
Schwartz J, Proffitt R. Cautioning the role of occupational therapy in addressing obesity[J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2024, 78(2): 7802050010.
10
王　瑞，姚　烽，陈春基，等．《中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2019版)》外科治疗解读[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志，2020, 27(11): 1265-1268.
11
韩　睿，林洪生. 健身气功八段锦对非小细胞肺癌术后患者肺功能及生存质量干预疗效的临床研究[J]. 天津中医药，2016, 33(12): 715-718.
12
周莉娅，杨晓静. 肺功能康复训练对非小细胞肺癌术后化疗患者的康复效果[J]. 临床医学，2023, 43(10): 80-82.
13
李建军，郑　婧. 肺康复训练联合个体化营养干预对非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复的影响[J]. 重庆医学，2023, 52(10): 1515-1519.
14
傅兆庆. 补肺活血汤促进非小细胞肺癌患者术后快速康复的临床研究[D]. 山东大学，2023: 23-46.
15
苏晓宁，郑建清，陈　樱. SF-36量表和EORTC QLQ-LC43量表在肺癌患者生活质量测定中的应用效果[J]. 中国卫生标准管理，2023, 14(9): 114-120.
16
吴珊珊. 健康教育联合心理护理对肺癌患者癌性疼痛及生活质量的影响分析[J]. 实用中西医结合临床，2021, 21(15): 147-148.
17
Judkins JL, Nguyen VT, Richardson MD, et al. Association between availability of direct access to army occupational therapy with return to duty in active-duty soldiers[J]. J Hand Ther, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.007.
18
Cogan AM, Haltom TM, Shimada SL, et al. Understanding patients′experiences during transitions from one electronic health record to another: A scoping review[J]. PEC Innov, 2024, 4: 100258.
19
Dostie R, Dunn H, Marks WN, et al. Use of telehealth for paediatric rehabilitation needs of Indigenous children-a scoping review[J]. Int J Circumpolar Health, 2024, 83(1): 2308944.
20
王　璐，单守勤. 作业疗法在颅脑损伤患者上肢功能恢复中的作用观察[J]. 中国疗养医学，2015, 24(1): 58-59.
21
朱卫娟. 作业疗法在脑卒中患者康复中的效果探讨[J]. 中国实用医药，2023, 18(15): 164-167.
22
Maurer J, Friedemann T, Chen Y, et al. A randomized controlled study on acupuncture for peri-operative pain after open radical prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2024: 725-732.
23
Georges O, Abou Arab O, Ben Rahal M, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic bronchial aspirate on postoperative pneumonia after pulmonary resection surgery for lung cancer: a Mono center retrospective study[J]. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2024, 38(2): ivad212.
24
Huang H, Liu B, Chen M, et al. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with Yiqi Buxue prescriptions combined with adjuvant chemotherapy on the cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2024, 323: 117665.
25
Munambah N, Ramugondo EL, Collins T, et al. Seeking consensus on a play-based intervention framework for promoting play of children with HIV/Aids in a low-resourced setting: A Delphi study[J]. Aust Occup Ther J, 2024, doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12936.
26
Henderson R, Lakshmanan R, McLaughlin A, et al. A complicated Chiari type 1 malformation and holocord syrinx as a likely cause for heel pain[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2024, 40(4): 997-1003.
27
Flores LE, Westmark D, Katz NB, et al. Prehabilitation in radiation therapy: a scoping review[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2024, 32(1): 83.
28
Mishra AK, Varma AR. A Comprehensive Review of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(9): e46115.
29
Lu Y, Bai X, Pan C. Impact of exercise interventions on quality of life and depression in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Psychiatry Med, 2024, 59(2): 199-217.
30
O′Brien K, Zhang B, Anderl E, et al. Special Considerations in Behavioral Assessments for Disorders of Consciousness [J]. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2024, 35(1): 93-108.
[1] 程必盛, 黄海. 盆腔肿瘤手术后的"隐藏危机"：泌尿功能障碍的防范与处理[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-5.
[2] 杨静, 附舰, 康艳霞. 血浆ctDNA T790M突变和总代谢肿瘤体积对晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者TKIs治疗及预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 379-384.
[3] 赵海燕, 靳海涛, 孔莺, 何瑞远. 血浆NGS-ctDNA对EGFR-TKIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 385-391.
[4] 陈旭, 牛凯, 孙建国. 放疗联合免疫治疗对驱动基因阴性NSCLC的困惑分析及应对策略[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 341-348.
[5] 罗强, 黄河清, 李益明, 刘丽萍, 白思远. 康莱特注射液在晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗中的应用分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 280-283.
[6] 刘康, 洪礼虎, 刘根, 彭力, 李祥攀. 复方红豆杉胶囊联合GP化疗对晚期NSCLC疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 284-287.
[7] 庞红燕, 宫艳格, 王瑶杰, 孙海鹏, 张连勇. TTF-1与非小细胞肺癌铂类药物化疗相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 303-306.
[8] 刘梦, 曾春琴, 周厚利, 方晏红, 吕小东. 青少年近视性屈光参差双眼视功能障碍的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 20-25.
[9] 罗丹, 柏宋磊, 易峰. HMGB1-TLR2/TLR4/RAGE通路与颅脑损伤并发认知功能障碍病情变化的关系研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 28-34.
[10] 韩晓雯, 郗医书, 郭娅, 陈艳珺. 骶神经刺激配合凯格尔运动对产后盆底功能障碍所致便秘患者的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 235-238.
[11] 李婛, 凌国源, 江山, 陈晓菊, 郭晓云. 非小细胞肺癌软脑膜转移通过Ommaya囊注射与腰椎穿刺术给药方式疗效的比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 128-132.
[12] 黄灏宇, 庄泽森, 林万庆, 石娇, 袁旭, 王单, 周晓媚, 万义文, 林源, 陈尚杰. 调神益智艾灸治疗遗忘型轻度认知障碍的弥散张量成像研究[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 58-64.
[13] 梁美斯, 兰慧敏, 于婷, 李胜桥. 白花丹素抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞增殖的研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 120-125.
[14] 胡梦瑶, 宋怡沛, 龚良庚. 心肌应变成像在糖尿病心肌病评估中的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 32-35.
[15] 许宽, 赵珩, 叶波. 2024年第1版美国国立综合癌症网络（NCCN）非小细胞肺癌指南手术部分解读[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 79-84.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号