切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 510 -515. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2025.04.003

论著

抗血管生成药物联合PD-1单抗治疗NSCLC的疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响
刘小丽, 罗倩, 种玉婷, 向贇, 马群宝, 莫亚斯尔·热合木拉, 黄玉蓉()   
  1. 830000 乌鲁木齐,新疆生产建设兵团医院·石河子大学医学院第二附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2025-08-25
  • 通信作者: 黄玉蓉
  • 基金资助:
    兵团科技计划项目(2023AB018-06); 兵团科技计划项目(2023CB001)

Efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs combined with PD-1 blockade in NSCLC treatment and its efficacy on T lymphocytes

Xiaoli Liu, Qian Luo, Yuting Chong, Yun Xiang, Qunbao Ma, Rehemula Moyasier·, Yurong Huang()   

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Hospital(The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Shihezi University), Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China
  • Received:2025-04-10 Published:2025-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Yurong Huang
引用本文:

刘小丽, 罗倩, 种玉婷, 向贇, 马群宝, 莫亚斯尔·热合木拉, 黄玉蓉. 抗血管生成药物联合PD-1单抗治疗NSCLC的疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 510-515.

Xiaoli Liu, Qian Luo, Yuting Chong, Yun Xiang, Qunbao Ma, Rehemula Moyasier·, Yurong Huang. Efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs combined with PD-1 blockade in NSCLC treatment and its efficacy on T lymphocytes[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 18(04): 510-515.

目的

分析抗血管生成药物联合程序性死亡受体-1(programmed death-1, PD-1)单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌(nonsmall-cell lung cancer, NSCLC)的疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。

方法

选择2019年1月至2023年6月我院收治的64例NSCLC患者为对象,分为观察组33例和对照组31例。对照组行替雷利珠单抗或信迪利单抗静脉输液治疗,观察组在免疫治疗基础上采用贝伐珠单抗注射液静脉输液治疗或盐酸安罗替尼胶囊口服治疗。采用流式细胞术分析两组治疗前后外周血CD3 T细胞、CD4 T细胞、CD8 T细胞、CD4/CD8 T细胞、CD4/CD25调节性T细胞百分比(%)。主要终点是根据实体肿瘤临床疗效评价标准1.1版评估的治疗反应和生存情况,计算疾病控制率和客观有效率;统计无进展生存期和总生存期。次要终点是根据国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准4.0版的不良事件的发生情况和严重程度,以及生命体征和实验室的异常变化。

结果

观察组客观有效14例(42.42%)高于对照组8例(25.81%)(P>0.05);观察组疾病控制(90.91%)高于对照组(61.29%)(P<0.05)。两组治疗后CD4、CD4/CD8细胞百分比较治疗前升高,观察组CD4(40.48±9.86)%、CD4/CD8+(1.68±0.59)%高于对照组(34.03±7.48)%、(1.33±0.49)%,(P<0.05);观察组治疗后CD8(25.92±6.45)% 、CD4CD25(4.47±1.80)%较治疗前(33.62±9.55)%、(5.53±2.13)%降低,CD3细胞百分比(71.66±9.90)%较治疗前(66.18±11.25)%升高(P<0.05)。64例患者不良免疫反应总发生36例(56.25%),发生率超过10%的免疫不良反应有甲状腺功能障碍、血液/肺/胃肠道/肝毒性。≥G3不良反应的发生率观察组18.18%高于对照组12.90%(P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析显示,观察组中位无进展生存期为7.8个月长于对照组6.9个月(P<0.05)。

结论

PD-1单抗联合抗血管生成药物治疗可改善机体的免疫抑制状态,有效提高晚期NSCLC患者疾病控制率并延长无进展生存期,治疗过程中不会增加免疫相关不良反应。

Objective

To analyze the effect of anti-angiogenic drugs combined with programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and T lymphocyte subsets.

Methods

A total of 64 patients with advanced stage (confirmed by pathology or cytology as stage ⅢB/ⅢC/Ⅳ) NSCLC admitted to Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Hospital (The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Shihezi University) from January 2019 to June 2023 were retrospectively selected as the subjects, including 33 patients in the observation group and 31 patients in the control group. Bevacizumab injection was administered intravenously or anrotinib hydrochloride capsules were administered orally. The proportion of peripheral plasma CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ /CD8+ T cells, CD4+ /CD25+ regulatory T cells before and 6 weeks after treatment were analyzed by flow cytometry. The primary endpoint is to evaluate treatment response and survival based on the clinical efficacy evaluation criteria for solid tumors version 1.1, and calculate disease control rate and objective efficacy rate; Statistics on progression free survival and overall survival. The secondary endpoints are the occurrence and severity of adverse events, as well as abnormal changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters, according to the National Cancer Institute′s Common Terminology for Adverse Events 4.0. The follow-up deadline is December 2024.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in objective efficacy between the control group and the observation group (25.81% vs. 42.42%, P=0.162). However, the disease control rate of the control group patients was significantly lower than that of the observation group (61.29% vs. 90.91%, P=0.007). After treatment, the proportions of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ in both groups increased compared to before treatment, and the observation group was higher than the control group (CD4+ : 40.48±9.86% vs. 34.03±7.48%, P=0.005; CD4+ /CD8+ : 1.68±0.59% vs. 1.33±0.49%, P=0.013). In addition, the proportions of CD8+ cells (25.92±6.45% vs. 33.62±9.55%) and CD4+ CD25+ (4.47±1.80% vs. 5.53±2.13%) in the observation group decreased compared to before treatment, while the percentage of CD3+ cells (71.66±9.90% vs. 66.18±11.25%) increased compared to before treatment (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse immune reactions was 56.25%, and more than 10% of adverse immune reactions include thyroid dysfunction, blood/lung/gastrointestinal/liver toxicity. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the median progression free survival in the observation group was 7.8 months, which was longer than the control group′s 6.9 months (Log Rank χ2=5.943, P=0.015).

Conclusion

The combination therapy of PD-1 monoclonal antibody and anti angiogenic drugs can improve the immune suppression status of the body, effectively improve the disease control rate and prolong the progression free survival of advanced NSCLC patients, and will not increase immune related adverse reactions during the treatment process.

图1 典型患者治疗启动后6周时的肺增强CT扫描图像。图A为观察组患者(女,55岁,Ⅳ期患者),治疗前胸部CT;图B为治疗后复查胸部CT,病灶缩小,获得部分缓解;图C为对照组患者(男,69岁,Ⅳ期患者)治疗前胸部CT;图D为治疗后复查胸部CT出现影像学疾病进展
图2 流式细胞术分析。图A为治疗前后外周血CD3变化;图B为治疗前后外周血CD4CD25变化
表1 两组NSCLC患者治疗前后免疫功能分析
1
Chen P, Liu Y, Wen Y, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer in China[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2022, 42(10): 937-970.
2
孟芸畅,许可,宋勇. 新辅助免疫治疗在可切除非小细胞肺癌中的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(5): 734-738.
3
Wang P, Fang X, Yin T, et al. Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after previous systemic treatment failure-a retrospective study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 628124.
4
Daher S, Lawrence YR, Dudnik E, et al. Nivolumab in non-small cell lung cancer: Real world long-term survival results and Blood-Based Efficacy Biomarkers[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 625668.
5
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
6
Aloe C, Wang H, Vlahos R, et al. Emerging and multifaceted role of neutrophils in lung cancer[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2021, 10(6): 2806-2818.
7
Su Y, Luo B, Lu Y, et al. Anlotinib induces a T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment by facilitating vessel normalization and enhances the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint blockade in neuroblastoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2022, 28(4): 793-809.
8
Martinez-Usatorre A, Kadioglu E, Boivin G, et al. Overcoming microenvironmental resistance to PD-1 blockade in genetically engineered lung cancer models[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2021, 13(606): eabd1616.
9
刘芳,彭岚竹,席菁乐. 高表达MYH9通过激活AKT/c-Myc通路抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞凋亡[J]. 南方医科大学学报2023, 43(4): 527-536.
10
Wu Y, Ma J, Yang X, et al. Neutrophil profiling illuminates anti-tumor antigen-presenting potency[J]. Cell, 2024, 187(6): 1422-1439.
11
Mellman I, Chen DS, Powles T, et al. The cancer-immunity cycle: Indication, genotype, and immunotype[J]. Immunity, 2023, 56(10): 2188-2205.
12
He J, Xiong X, Yang H, et al. Defined tumor antigen-specific T cells potentiate personalized TCR-T cell therapy and prediction of immunotherapy response[J]. Cell Res, 2022, 32(6): 530-542.
13
Wu M, Huang Q, Xie Y, et al. Improvement of the anticancer efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade via combination therapy and PD-L1 regulation[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2022, 15(1): 24.
14
黄燕妮,蓝雪灵,朱敏敏,等. PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合抗血管内皮生长因子药物免疫治疗晚期肝癌的研究进展[J]. 中国药理学通报2024, 40(8): 1429-1436.
15
Chen S, Mo W, Jiang W, et al. The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1218258.
16
Zhu LL, Liu JW, Wang L, et al. Molecular regulatory network of PD-1/PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2020, 216(4): 152852.
17
Yi M, Zheng X, Niu M, et al. Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 28.
18
Sorin M, Prosty C, Ghaleb L, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2024, 10(5): 621-633.
19
王朝,韩雪,张爱霞. LIPI评分对PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗非小细胞肺癌效果与预后的价值分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2023, 33(6): 55-60.
20
武玮,徐丽艳. 卡瑞利珠单抗用于治疗非小细胞肺癌的真实世界研究数据分析[J]. 中国新药杂志2022, 31(20): 2011-2015.
21
余超群,潘成文. 信迪利单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志2023, 39(18): 2612-2616.
22
Huang Q, Wu X, Wang Z, et al. The primordial differentiation of tumor-specific memory CD8+ T cells as bona fide responders to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in draining lymph nodes[J]. Cell, 2022, 185(22): 4049-4066.e25.
23
Liang H, Wang M. Prospect of immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 7707-7719.
24
Zhao Y, Guo S, Deng J, et al. VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Targeting the tumor microenvironment[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2022, 18(9): 3845-3858.
25
Li MSC, Mok KKS, Mok TSK. Developments in targeted therapy & immunotherapy-how non-small cell lung cancer management will change in the next decade: a narrative review[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2023, 11(10): 358.
26
Li L, Wen Q, Ding R. Therapeutic targeting of VEGF and/or TGF-β to enhance anti-PD-(L)1 therapy: The evidence from clinical trials[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 905520.
27
晏芾,滕悦,俞心念,等. 安罗替尼联合PD-1抑制剂二线治疗老年晚期肺腺癌患者的疗效及对T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(4): 550-554.
28
潘晓葶,戴安伟. 安罗替尼联合PD-1单抗三线及以上治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性[J]. 现代肿瘤医学2023, 31(16): 3024-3027.
29
周俊,陈舒曼,邢兵,等. 正常来源CD4+CD25+细胞在小鼠肺癌模型中的抗肿瘤作用[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(2): 191-199.
30
Furukawa K, Nagano T, Tachihara M, et al. Interaction between Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Cancer[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(17): 3900.
[1] 郑仁英, 罗凤梅, 李婷婷, 金勇, 万小亚. 吡咯替尼治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 167-174.
[2] 陈隆, 段晓鑫, 王思卓, 董胜利. 胃癌免疫治疗的现状[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 177-182.
[3] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[4] 杨梦媛, 白启轩, 赵晓琳, 黄坤, 李珍, 曹世长, 程建平. ESD治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤与大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 405-408.
[5] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 王俭, 蒋媛, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 贲门失弛缓症合并食管裂孔疝手术技巧及临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 265-268.
[6] 石娟利, 龙小丽, 相庚, 张笑, 师卓维. 非小细胞肺癌患者认知水平与癌因性疲乏的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 452-456.
[7] 赵雅波, 王倩, 闫小龙, 王元勇, 何改花, 郭一泽. 早期非小细胞肺癌患者术前术后血清miR-21 和miR-937-3p表达变化的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 345-349.
[8] 乔鲜丽, 田向阳, 周文雅, 秦泽敏, 郭姗姗, 于俊岩. 循环肿瘤DNA 对非小细胞肺癌术后复发风险的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 395-400.
[9] 杨钰泽, 徐家豪, 杨一石, 王明达, 杨田. 肝细胞癌新辅助治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 515-521.
[10] 刘晓嵩, 袁春. 双Endobutton钢板与钩板治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅳ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效及并发症研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 155-162.
[11] 皮秀敏, 张云鹏, 屈伟, 胡宏宇. 骨搬运联合骨水泥分段填塞与骨短缩-延长术治疗创伤后胫骨大段骨缺损的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 237-244.
[12] 闫强, 王海虎, 倪进荣, 邓杰林, 陈华昌, 张杰. 单纯掌侧入路掌侧单钢板固定术治疗背侧移位桡骨远端不稳定骨折的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 161-169.
[13] 王明辉, 李文波, 李群, 王静, 董倩倩, 范飞飞, 李灵敏, 刘晓峰. 内镜下套扎及硬化治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ度内痔的长期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 381-385.
[14] 李艳, 呼霞, 赵娟. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后应激指标、炎症因子、T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 393-397.
[15] 王春增, 拾坤, 薛有地, 伦智法, 岳璇, 马超, 刘光旺. 脊髓型颈椎病患者术前心理状态对颈前入路术后疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 284-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?