切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 307 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2020.03.004

论著

阿帕替尼在二线以上小细胞肺癌中的临床应用
畅婕1, 高宏祥1, 杨拴盈2, 杜建飞1,()   
  1. 1. 710016 西安,长安医院肿瘤科
    2. 710004 西安,西安交通大学第二附属医院呼吸科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-13 出版日期:2020-06-25
  • 通信作者: 杜建飞
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81672300)

Efficacy and survival analysis of apatinib in treatment of beyond second-line small cell lung cancer

Jie Chang1, Hongxiang Gao1, Shuanying Yang2, Jianfei Du1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Chang′an Hospital, Xi′an 710016, China
    2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710004, China
  • Received:2020-01-13 Published:2020-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianfei Du
引用本文:

畅婕, 高宏祥, 杨拴盈, 杜建飞. 阿帕替尼在二线以上小细胞肺癌中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(03): 307-313.

Jie Chang, Hongxiang Gao, Shuanying Yang, Jianfei Du. Efficacy and survival analysis of apatinib in treatment of beyond second-line small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(03): 307-313.

目的

探讨阿帕替尼应用于二线以上进展期小细胞肺癌的临床疗效、不良反应、影响因素和生存分析。

方法

收集二线以上化疗失败的小细胞肺癌患者30例,均给予甲磺酸阿帕替尼片500 mg/次/d口服,28 d为一疗程,有Ⅲ-Ⅳ级不良反应时减量至250 mg/次/d,至疾病进展或药物不良反应无法耐受则停药,观察服药2个疗程的临床疗效,及整个服药期间的不良反应。通过Kaplan-Meier法分析生存情况和影响因素,将有统计学意义的影响因素纳入多因素Cox比例风险模型进行分析。

结果

30例患者经过2个疗程评估客观缓解率(ORR)为36.6%,疾病控制率(DCR)为66.6%,中位无疾病进展期(PFS)4.0个月(95%CI 2.864~5.136个月),中位总生存期(OS)6.0个月(95%CI 4.555~7.445个月)。治疗期间主要不良反应为高血压发生率56.6%,蛋白尿发生率33.33%,血小板减少率56.6%,白细胞减少率86.6%,丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高16.6%,胃肠道反应10.0%,疲劳33.3%,手足综合证23.3%,无Ⅳ级以上不良反应。应用Kaplan-Meier法和多因素Cox回归模型分析低钠血症(HR=3.693,95%CI为1.043~13.082,P=0.043)、高血压(HR=0.279,95%CI为0.090~0.869,P=0.028)是PFS的独立影响因素,低钠血症(HR=8.675,95%CI为2.284~32.947,P=0.002)、分期(HR=4.915,95%CI为1.151~20.978,P=0.032)、高血压(HR=0.128,95%CI为0.031~0.537,P=0.005)是OS的独立影响因素。

结论

阿帕替尼应用于二线以上进展期小细胞肺癌存在疗效,不良反应可耐受。治疗前期出现低钠血症及分期较高的患者预后不佳,不良反应出现高血压应用阿帕替尼可能存在生存优势。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy, toxicity, influence factors and survival analysis of apatinib in the patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after failure of beyond second-line treatment.

Methods

Thirty SCLC patients after failure of beyond second-line chemotherapy received oral administration of 500 mg of apatinib once a day, 28 days as a cycle, which was reduced to 250 mg once a day due to obvious adverse reactions or drug withdrawal due to disease progression or intolerance. The clinical efficacy of two courses of medication and the adverse reactions during the whole period of medication were observed. The survival and influencing factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, and the influencing factors with statistical significant difference were included in the multi-factor Cox proportional risk model.

Results

The objective response rate was 36.66% and the disease control rate was 66.6% after two cycles of medication. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95%CI 2.864~5.136), the median overall survival (OS) was 6.0 months (95%CI 4.555~7.445), and the main adverse reactions were hypertension (56.6%), proteinuria (33.3%), thrombocytopenia (56.6%), leukopenia (86.6%), abnormal liver function (16.6%), diarrhea (10.0%), fatigue (33.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (23.3%). Grade Ⅳ adverse reactions were not found. Hyponatremia (HR=3.693, 95%CI 1.043~13.082, P=0.043) and hypertension (HR=0.279, 95%CI 0.090~0.869, P=0.028) were independent influencing factors of PFS with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression model. Hyponatremia (HR=8.675, 95%CI 2.284~32.947, P=0.002), staging (HR=4.915, 95%CI 1.151~20.978, P=0.032) and hypertension (HR=0.128, 95%CI 0.031~0.537, P=0.005) were independent influencing factors of OS.

Conclusion

Apatinib is effective in the treatment of advanced SCLC above the second line. The prognosis of the patients with hyponatremia and higher stages before treatment is not good, and the patients with side effects of hypertension may have survival advantages by using apatinib.

图1 低钠血症对PFS的影响
图2 高血压对PFS的影响
表1 30例患者Kaplan-Meier单因素和Cox多因素分析对PFS的影响
图3 低钠血症对OS的影响
图4 分期对OS的影响
图5 高血压对OS的影响
表2 30例患者Kaplan-Meier单因素和Cox多因素分析对OS的影响
表3 阿帕替尼治疗二线以上进展的小细胞肺癌的不良反应
图6 典型病例胸部CT变化;注:A和B是基线,C和D是使用阿帕替尼4周后的CT表现
1
钱桂生. 肺癌不同病理类型发病率的变化情况及其原因[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(1): 1-5.
2
李王平,马李杰,潘 蕾,等. 白藜芦醇对小细胞肺癌C-myc基因表达的调控研究[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(2): 148-153.
3
Koinis F, Kotsakis A, Georgoulias V. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC):no treatment advances in recent years[J]. Translat Lung Cancer Res, 2016, 5(1): 39-50.
4
Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase Ⅲ Trial of Apatinib in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(13): 1448-1454.
5
Zhang L, Shi M, Huang C, et al. A phase Ⅱ,multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of apatinib in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after two previous treatment regimens[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(15suppl): 1123-1134.
6
Hu X, Cao J, Hu W, et al. Multicenter phase Ⅱ study of apatinib in non-triple-negative metastatic breast cancer[J]. Bmc Cancer, 2014, 14(1): 820-826.
7
刘 斌,秦建文,周静敏. 复发性小细胞肺癌治疗进展[J].中国肺癌杂志,2017, 20(3): 192-198.
8
Tartarone A, Giordano P, Lerose R, et al. Progress and challenges in the treatment of small cell lung cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34(6): 110.
9
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation[J]. Cell, 2011, 144(5): 646-674.
10
Dowell JE, Amirkhan RH, Lai WS, et al. Survival in small cell lung cancer is independent of tumor expression of VEGF and COX-2.[J]. Anticancer Res, 2004, 24(4): 2367-2373.
11
袁晓晗,杨 杰,秦婷婷,等. VEGFA和VEGFR2对肺腺癌患者术后无病生存的预测价值[J]. 肿瘤,2017, 37(7): 716-722.
12
Horn L, Dahlberg SE, Sandler AB, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of cisplatin plus etoposide and bevacizumab for previously untreated, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501.[J]. J Clin Oncol Oncol, 2011, 27(35): 6006-6011.
13
Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, et al. Randomized Phase Ⅱ Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the SALUTE Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(16): 2215-2222.
14
Ready NE, Dudek AZ, Pang HH, et al. Cisplatin, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab for Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30306, a Phase Ⅱ Study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(33): 4436-4441.
15
Pujol JL, Lavole A, Quoix E, et al. Randomized phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trial.[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(5): 908-914.
16
Tiseo M, Boni L, Ambrosio F, et al. 3*Italian multicenter phase Ⅲ randomized study of cisplatin-etoposide with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC): GOIRC-AIFA FARM6PMFJM trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(12): 1281-1287.
17
Jalal S, Bedano P, Einhorn L, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with chemosensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer: a safety, feasibility, and efficacy study from the Hoosier Oncology Group.[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2010, 5(12): 2008-2011.
18
Geng R, Li J. Apatinib for the treatment of gastric cancer[J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2015, 16(1): 117-122.
19
Lin Y, Wang C, Gao W, et al. Overwhelming rapid metabolic and structural response to apatinib in radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(26): 42252-42261.
20
Hong W, Li H, Jin XY, et al. P1.07-053 Apatinib for Chemotherapy-Refractory Extensive Stage SCLC: Results from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2017, 12: S729.
21
曲范杰,于韦韦,张 捷. 阿帕替尼联合化疗治疗晚期小细胞肺癌1例报告及文献复习[J]. 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2017, 11(8): 923-925.
22
秦叔逵,李 进. 阿帕替尼治疗胃癌的临床应用专家共识[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2015, 20(9): 841-847.
23
Fengying W, Shijia Z, Anwen X, et al. A phase Ⅱ clinical trial of apatinib in pretreated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2018, 19(6): e831-e842.
24
Xue J, Astère M, Zhong M, et al. Efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2018, 11: 6119-6128.
25
王晓蕊,汪 旭,史业辉,等. 阿帕替尼治疗晚期难治性三阴性乳腺癌的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2017, 11(15): 769-772.
26
孙培培,张 龙,张 泰,等. 单药阿帕替尼治疗二线及二线以上化疗失败的晚期大肠癌患者疗效分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2017, 22(7): 646-649.
27
Petereit C, Zaba O, Teber I, et al. A rapid and efficient way to manage hyponatremia in patients with SIADH and small cell lung cancer: treatment with tolvaptan[J]. Bmc Pulm Med, 2013, 13(1): 55-55.
28
Onitilo AA, Kio E, Doi SA. Tumor-related hyponatremia[J]. Clin Med Res, 2007, 5(4): 228-237.
29
Zhang Y, Jing YU, Oncology DO, et al. Study on the efficacy and safety of Apatinib in treatment of advanced malignant tumor[J]. J Clin Experiment Med, 2018, 9: 20-24.
30
Van Heeckren WJ, Ortiz J, Coonky MM, et al. Hypertension, proteinuria,and antagonism of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling: clinical toxicity, therapeutic target, or novel biomarker?[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(21): 2993-2995.
31
Lankhorst S, Kappers MH, van Esch JH, et al. Hypertension During Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibition: Focus on Nitric Oxide, Endothelin-1, and Oxidative Stress[J]. Antioxidants Redox Signal, 2014, 20(1): 135-145.
32
赵青芳,关露露,吕慧芳,等. 阿帕替尼治疗晚期胃癌的疗效预测和预后分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2018, 28(3): 203-209.
[1] 刘伟, 安杰, 智亮辉, 陈金辉. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对局部晚期结肠癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 199-203.
[2] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[3] 赵蒙蒙, 黄洁, 余荣环, 王葆青. 过表达小GTP酶Rab32抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞侵袭性生长[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 512-518.
[4] 张桂萍, 丘勇林, 湛绮婷, 孙乐栋. 晚期非小细胞肺癌血清Ape1/Ref-1对放射性肺损伤发生的预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 519-523.
[5] 韩晓宇, 李柯育, 赵志菲, 高建平. SNHG17过表达对非小细胞肺癌切除术预后的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 543-547.
[6] 刘松, 张进召, 贾艳云. 帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌反应降低与抗生素预处理的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 553-557.
[7] 李多, 郝昭昭, 陈延伟, 南岩东. 血清PTX3表达与非小细胞肺癌骨转移的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 558-562.
[8] 陈旭, 牛凯, 孙建国. 放疗联合免疫治疗对驱动基因阴性NSCLC的困惑分析及应对策略[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 341-348.
[9] 杨静, 附舰, 康艳霞. 血浆ctDNA T790M突变和总代谢肿瘤体积对晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者TKIs治疗及预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 379-384.
[10] 赵海燕, 靳海涛, 孔莺, 何瑞远. 血浆NGS-ctDNA对EGFR-TKIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 385-391.
[11] 韩苏驰, 黄琰菁. 乳酸脱氢酶与小细胞肺癌脑转移风险临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 402-406.
[12] 白丽丽, 江榆, 黄亮亮, 白莹, 张敏. 作业疗法在非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复中应用分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 411-415.
[13] 李静静, 许金花, 吴国峰, 任亚俊, 张骞云. 伏美替尼一线治疗EGFR突变晚期NSCLC脑转移的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 426-429.
[14] 尹炳驿, 张楚楚, 刘艺, 林洪生. 益气清金汤加味治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 462-465.
[15] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要