切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 615 -623. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2023.05.003

论著

驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌BRCA1/2基因突变与含铂化疗疗效的关系
吴天秀, 徐瑜, 廖秀清, 姚伟, 王关嵩, 杨昱, 王斌, 郭亮, 张明周, 吴国明, 罗莉, 白莉, 王彦, 胡明冬, 徐智()   
  1. 400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院呼吸与危重症医学中心
    408099 重庆,重庆大学附属涪陵医院呼吸与危重症医学中心
    401120 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第三医院呼吸与危重症医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-07 出版日期:2023-10-25
  • 通信作者: 徐智
  • 基金资助:
    2018年陆军卫生保健专项科研项目(18BJZ02); 陆军军医大学第二附属医院(新桥医院)临床研究重点项目(2016YLC02); 陆军军医大学重点支持对象培养项目(2019R025)

Relationship between BRCA1/2 gene mutation and efficacy of platinum-base chemotherapy in driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer

Tianxiu Wu, Yu Xu, Xiuqing Liao, Wei Yao, Guansong Wang, Yu Yang, Bin Wang, Liang Guo, Mingzhou Zhang, Guoming Wu, Li Luo, Li Bai, Yan Wang, Mingdong Hu, Zhi Xu()   

  1. Center for Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
    Center of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Fuling Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University, Chongqing 408099, China
    Center of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401120, China
  • Received:2023-09-07 Published:2023-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhi Xu
引用本文:

吴天秀, 徐瑜, 廖秀清, 姚伟, 王关嵩, 杨昱, 王斌, 郭亮, 张明周, 吴国明, 罗莉, 白莉, 王彦, 胡明冬, 徐智. 驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌BRCA1/2基因突变与含铂化疗疗效的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 615-623.

Tianxiu Wu, Yu Xu, Xiuqing Liao, Wei Yao, Guansong Wang, Yu Yang, Bin Wang, Liang Guo, Mingzhou Zhang, Guoming Wu, Li Luo, Li Bai, Yan Wang, Mingdong Hu, Zhi Xu. Relationship between BRCA1/2 gene mutation and efficacy of platinum-base chemotherapy in driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(05): 615-623.

目的

分析BRCA1/2基因在驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)中的突变频率、突变类型及与含铂化疗疗效的关系。

方法

选择2018年5月至2021年9月在陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院呼吸与危重症医学中心、重庆大学附属涪陵医院呼吸与危重症医学中心、重庆医科大学附属第三医院呼吸与危重症医学中心诊治且肺癌驱动基因阴性,一线接受含铂双药化疗的Ⅲ~Ⅳ期NSCLC患者101例。采集肿瘤组织或血液标本,采用二代测序(next-generation sequencing, NGS)检测BRCA1/2基因突变。按RECIST1.1标准评估疗效,主要终点客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)。分析BRCA1/2基因突变与含铂化疗疗效的关系。

结果

驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期NSCLC 101例中19例(18.8%)BRCA1/2基因突变。BRCA1/2基因突变类型包括单核苷酸多态性、插入、缺失。突变模式有错义突变、无义突变、框内插入、移码缺失、移码插入。BRCA1/2基因突变组和BRCA1/2基因野生型组在人口学基线特征上无统计学差异。经4~6个周期标准一线含铂双药化疗治疗后,与BRCA1/2野生型组相比,BRCA1/2基因突变组ORR(68.4% vs. 36.6%,P=0.019)和DCR(100% vs. 76.8%,P=0.020)佳,中位无进展生存期(mPFS)显著延长(8.0个月vs. 4.6个月,P=0.009),中位总生存期(mOS)有延长趋势(19.4个月vs. 16.4个月,P=0.631)。BRCA1基因突变组与BRCA2基因突变组ORR( 66.7% vs. 64.3%,P=0.567)、PFS(13.7个月vs. 7.8个月,P=0.145)和OS(24.0个月vs. 14.4个月,P=0.142)无统计学差异。

结论

BRCA1/2基因突变在驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期NSCLC中的突变频率约18.8%。BRCA1/2基因突变最常见类型是单核苷酸多态性,最常见突变模式是错义突变。伴有BRCA1/2基因突变的驱动基因阴性Ⅲ/Ⅳ期NSCLC可能更易从一线含铂双药化疗中获益。

Objective

To explore the BRCA1/2 gene mutation frequency, the mutation types and the relationship between RCA1/2 gene mutation and efficacy of platinum-base chemotherapy in driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

All of 101patients with driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ NSCLC who were initially diagnosed and received platinum containing dual drug chemotherapy at the Respiratory and Critical Care Medical Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital Army Medical University, Fuling Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. BRCA1/2 gene mutations in tumor tissue/blood samples were detcted by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). The treatment response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). The primary endpoint was ORR, PFS, The secondary endpoints DCR, OS. The relationships between BRCA1/2 gene mutations and the efficacy of platinum containing chemotherapy were analyzed by medical statistics.

Results

All of 101 driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. 19(18.8%) of 101 patients had BRCA1/2 gene mutations. The mutation types of BRCA1/2 include single nucleotide polymorphism, insertion and deletion; The mutation pattern include missense mutation, nonsense mutation, inframe insertion, frameshift deletion, and frameshift insertion. BRCA1/2 gene mutation group and BRCA1/2 gene wild-type group was no statistical difference in demographic baseline characteristics. After receiving 4-6 cycles of standard first-line platinum-base dual drug chemotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR 68.4% vs. 36.6%, P=0.019) and disease control rate (DCR 100% vs. 76.8%, P=0.020) of the BRCA1/2 gene mutation group was significantly higher than that of the BRCA1/2 gene wild type group. In contrast to the BRCA1/2 gene wild type group, the BRCA1/2 gene mutation group has longer median PFS(mPFS, 8.0 months vs. 4.6 months, P=0.009, HR 0.537, 95%CI: 0.351-0.821), while the median OS(mOS)just has lengthen tendency but no significantly different (19.4 months vs. 16.4 months, P=0.631, HR 0.866, 95%CI 0.491-1.528). In the subgroups of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations, there was no statistically significant difference in ORR (66.7% vs. 64.3%, P=0.567), PFS (13.7 months vs. 7.8 months, P=0.145) and OS (24.0 months vs. 14.4 months, P=0.142).

Conclusions

BRCA1/2 gene mutations frequency is about 18.8% in driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ NSCLC. The most common mutation types of BRCA1/2 gene is single nucleotide polymorphism and the most common mutation pattern is missense mutation. Driver mutation-negative stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ NSCLC patients with BRCA1/2 gene mutations may be more easy benefit from first-line platinum containing dual drug chemotherapy.

表1 NSCLC患者基线临床特征[n(%)]
图1 19例NSCLC患者BRCA1/2基因突变信息。注:A:突变模式,包括错义突变(Missense Mutation)、无义突变(Nonsense Mutation)、框内插入(In_Frame_Ins)、移码缺失(Frame_Shift_Del)、移码插入(Frame_Shift_Ins);B:突变类型,包括单核苷酸多态性(SNP)、插入(INS)、缺失(DEL);C:SNP(点突变)中碱基突变分类和数量;D:19例突变数量与比例,纵坐标为突变数量,不同颜色占比表示不同突变比例;E:错义突变、无义突变、框内插入、移码缺失、移码插入突变数量的箱式图;F:BRCA1的基因突变包括错义突变、无义突变、框内插入、移码缺失4种类型,以错义突变为主,BRCA2基因突变包括错义突变、无义突变、框内插入、移码缺失、移码插入5种类型,以错义突变为主
表2 19例BRCA1/2突变NSCLC患者临床信息、突变位点与类型
编号 年龄(岁) 性别 病理类型 吸烟史 分期 ECOG评分 突变基因 HGVSc HGVSp 突变类型
1 54 鳞癌 ⅢC期 1 BRCA2 c.323A>G p.Asn108Ser SNP
2 69 腺癌 ⅣA期 1 BRCA1 c.3247A>G p.Met1083Val SNP
              BRCA1 c.2110_2111del p.Asn704CysfsTer7 DEL
3 58 鳞癌 ⅢB期 1 BRCA2 c.7380C>A p.Asn2460Lys SNP
4 46 鳞癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA2 c.5683G>T p.Glu1895Ter SNP
5 68 鳞癌 ⅢA期 1 BRCA2 c.6100C>T p.Arg2034Cys SNP
6 61 鳞癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA2 c.7070T>C p.Leu2357Pro SNP
7 63 腺癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA2 c.8009C>T p.Ser2670Leu SNP
8 54 鳞癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA1 c.5418_5419ins p.Leu1807LysfsTer12 INS
9 58 腺癌 ⅣA期 1 BRCA2 c.6121T>A p.Ser2041Thr SNP
10 51 鳞癌 ⅣA期 0 BRCA2 c.2808_2811del p.Ala938ProfsTer21 DEL
              BRCA2 c.4741G>A p.Glu1581Lys SNP
11 63 鳞癌 ⅢB期 1 BRCA1 c.1243G>A p.Val415Ile SNP
12 58 鳞癌 ⅣA期 1 BRCA1 c.514C>G p.Gln172Glu SNP
13 63 鳞癌 ⅢC期 0 BRCA2 c.850G>A p.Gly284Arg SNP
              BRCA2 c.9392C>G p.Ser3131Cys SNP
14 62 鳞癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA1 c.4249G>A p.Val1417Met SNP
15 67 鳞癌 ⅢC期 1 BRCA2 c.6422G>A p.Gly2141Asp SNP
16 62 鳞癌 ⅢC期 0 BRCA2 c.1015G>A p.Asp339Asn SNP
              BRCA2 c.4264G>C p.Glu1422Gln SNP
17 66 鳞癌 ⅢB期 0 BRCA2 c.580_581insC p.Trp194SerfsTer12 INS
              BRCA2 c.9154C>T p.Arg3052Trp SNP
18 67 腺癌 ⅣA期 1 BRCA2 c.2191G>T p.Glu731Ter SNP
              BRCA2 c.2196_2197ins p.Glu732_Val733ins INS
              BRCA2 c.3679_3680ins p.Lys1226_Leu1227ins INS
              BRCA2 c.6062A>T p.His2021Leu SNP
              BRCA1 c.1396_1397ins p.Tyr465_Arg466ins INS
19 65 鳞癌 ⅢB期 1 BRCA2 c.6172T>A p.Phe2058Ile SNP
              BRCA2 c.6926G>A p.Ser2309Asn SNP
图2 PFS森林图。注:PFS多因素Cox比例风险模型森林图,图中圆点是风险比率(HR)值
图3 OS森林图。注:OS多因素Cox比例风险模型森林图,图中圆点是风险比率(HR)值
图4 BRCA1/2基因突变状态与含铂化疗疗效相关性分析。注:A:BRCA1/2突变组客观缓解率68.4%,其中CR1例,PR12例;B:BRCA1/2野生型组客观缓解率36.59%,其中PR30例;C:BRCA1/2基因突变组的客观缓解率(ORR)高于野生型组(P=0.019);D:BRCA1/2基因突变组的疾病控制率(DCR)高于与野生型组(P=0.020);E:BRCA1/2基因突变组CR1例、PR12例、SD6例、PD0例,ORR68.4%;F:BRCA1/2野生型组CR0例、PR30例、SD33例、PD19例,ORR36.6%;G:BRCA1/2基因突变组与野生型组PFS生存曲线。BRCA1/2基因突变组mPFS=8.0个月,BRCA1/2基因野生型组mPFS=4.6个月(P=0.009)。H:BRCA1/2基因突变组与野生型组OS生存曲线。BRCA1/2基因突变组mOS=19.4个月,BRCA1/2基因野生型组mOS=16.4(P=0.631)
表3 BRCA1/2基因突变状态与含铂化疗疗效[n(%)]
图5 BRCA1、BRCA2基因含铂双药化疗疗效图。注:A:客观缓解率(ORR)条形图。BRCA1基因组客观缓解率66.7%,其中CR1例,PR3例;BRCA2基因组客观缓解率64.3%,其中PR9例,两组间ORR无显著统计学差异(P=0.567)。B:BRCA1、BRCA2基因突变肿瘤治疗后主病灶变化最佳长径瀑布图,绿色表示BRCA1基因突变5例,粉红色表示同时有BRCA1、BRCA2基因突变1例,蓝色表示BRCA2基因突变13例。C:BRCA1基因组、BRCA2基因组PFS生存曲线(P=0.145)。D. BRCA1基因组、BRCA2基因组OS生存曲线(P=0.142)
表4 BRCA1、BRCA2基因与含铂双药化疗疗效(%)
1
Hanna Nasser, Johnson David, Temin Sarah, et al. Systemic therapy for stage Ⅳ non-small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary[J]. J Oncol Pract, 2017, 13(12): 832-837.
2
Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Correction to: "Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up" [J]. Ann Oncol, 2019, 30(5): 863-870.
3
Arbour Kathryn C, Riely Gregory J. Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A review[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(8): 764-774.
4
Abdelazeem Basel, Abbas Kirellos Said, Labieb Fatma, et al. The role of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2022, 22(10): 1127-1140.
5
Cella Eugenia, Zullo Lodovica, Marconi Silvia, et al. Immunotherapy-chemotherapy combinations for non-small cell lung cancer: current trends and future perspectives[J]. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2022, 22(10): 1259-1273.
6
Griesinger F, Korol EE, Kayaniyil S, et al. Efficacy and safety of first-line carboplatin-versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis[J]. Lung Cancer, 2019, 135: 196-204.
7
Duma Narjust, Santana-Davila Rafael, Molina Julian R. Non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2019, 94(8): 1623-1640.
8
重庆市医学会肿瘤学分会化疗学组. 肺癌化疗原则专家共识[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析2022, 22(12): 1428-1438.
9
Pirker Robert. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer[J]. Curr Opin Oncol, 2020, 32(1): 63-67.
10
Theo AK, Wang LH, Michael TZ, et al. Genomic and molecular landscape of DNA damage repair deficiency across the cancer genome atlas[J]. Cell Rep, 2018, 23(1): 239-254.
11
Chai Y, Chen YJ, Zhang D, et al. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA 1/2 gene mutation for predicting the effect of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(2): 323.
12
Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30: 2654-2663.
13
Mark MP, Sandor S, Li Jia, et al. The association between germline BRCA2 variants and sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy among men with metastatic prostate cancer[J]. Cancer, 2017, 123(18): 3532-3539.
14
Teo MY, Seier K, Ostrovnaya I, et al. Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential marker of clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial cancers[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36: 1685-1694.
15
Biagio R, Gonzalo R, Liam FS, et al. Impact of DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene mutations on efficacy of PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2020, 26(15): 4135-4142.
16
Hu Xingsheng, Yang Dongyong, Li Yalun, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2019, 16(3): 556-564.
17
Zhang Linlin, Guan Shasha, Meng Fanlu, et al. Next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination genes could predict efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1035808.
18
Yan Bokang, Xie Bin, Huang Meiyuan, et al. Mutations and expressions of breast cancer 1/2 in lung cancer[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2023, 14(18): 1753-1763.
19
Gao Xianqi, Nan Xiyan, Liu Yilan, et al. Comprehensive profiling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in breast and ovarian cancer in Chinese patients[J]. Hum Mutat, 2020, 41(3): 696-708.
20
Peter MS, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Edwin SI, et al. A cross-cancer genetic association analysis of the DNA repair and DNA damage signaling pathways for lung, ovary, prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2016, 25(1): 193-200.
21
Dasari S, Bernard TP. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2014, 740: 364-378.
22
Zeng C, Fan WD, Zhang XQ. RRMI expression is associated with the outcome of gemcitabine-based treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients-a short report[J]. Cell Oncol, 2015, 38(4): 319-325.
23
O′Grady Shane, Finn Stephen P, Cuffe Sinead, et al. The role of DNA repair pathways in cisplatin resistant lung cancer[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2014, 40(10): 1161-1170.
24
Dilruba S, Kalayda GV. Platinum-based drugs: past, present and future[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2016, 77(6): 1103-1124.
25
Pennington KP, Walsh T, Harrell MI, et al. Germline and somatic mutations in homologous recombination genes predict platinum response and survival in ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinomas[J]. Clin Cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res, 2014, 20(3): 764-775.
26
Kadouri L, Rottenberg Y, Zick A, et al. Homologous recombination in lung cancer, germline and somatic mutations, clinical and phenotype characterization[J]. Lung Cancer, 2019, 137: 48-51.
27
Owen DH, Williams TM, Bertino EM, et al. Homologous recombination and DNA repair mutations in patients treated with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2019, 134: 167-173.
28
Diossy M, Sztupinszki Z, Borcsok J, et al. A subset of lung cancer cases shows robust signs of homologous recombination deficiency associated genomic mutational signatures[J]. NPJ Precis Oncol, 2021, 5(1): 55.
[1] 赵蒙蒙, 黄洁, 余荣环, 王葆青. 过表达小GTP酶Rab32抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞侵袭性生长[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 512-518.
[2] 张桂萍, 丘勇林, 湛绮婷, 孙乐栋. 晚期非小细胞肺癌血清Ape1/Ref-1对放射性肺损伤发生的预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 519-523.
[3] 韩晓宇, 李柯育, 赵志菲, 高建平. SNHG17过表达对非小细胞肺癌切除术预后的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 543-547.
[4] 刘松, 张进召, 贾艳云. 帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌反应降低与抗生素预处理的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 553-557.
[5] 李多, 郝昭昭, 陈延伟, 南岩东. 血清PTX3表达与非小细胞肺癌骨转移的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 558-562.
[6] 陈旭, 牛凯, 孙建国. 放疗联合免疫治疗对驱动基因阴性NSCLC的困惑分析及应对策略[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 341-348.
[7] 杨静, 附舰, 康艳霞. 血浆ctDNA T790M突变和总代谢肿瘤体积对晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者TKIs治疗及预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 379-384.
[8] 赵海燕, 靳海涛, 孔莺, 何瑞远. 血浆NGS-ctDNA对EGFR-TKIs治疗晚期NSCLC患者的预后意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 385-391.
[9] 白丽丽, 江榆, 黄亮亮, 白莹, 张敏. 作业疗法在非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复中应用分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 411-415.
[10] 李静静, 许金花, 吴国峰, 任亚俊, 张骞云. 伏美替尼一线治疗EGFR突变晚期NSCLC脑转移的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 426-429.
[11] 尹炳驿, 张楚楚, 刘艺, 林洪生. 益气清金汤加味治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 462-465.
[12] 罗孝平, 封敏, 黄川, 唐茜, 蒋艳, 胡莉丽. 渐进式抗阻训练干预在非小细胞肺癌中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 472-474.
[13] 李婛, 凌国源, 江山, 陈晓菊, 郭晓云. 非小细胞肺癌软脑膜转移通过Ommaya囊注射与腰椎穿刺术给药方式疗效的比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 128-132.
[14] 张迅夫, 马金山, 蒋云龙, 加纳提·托勒恒, 侯昌剑, 萨伍提·斯拉吉丁. GATA3在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达及临床病理意义[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 175-179.
[15] 李子健, 王锐, 钟云鹏, 张迪轩, 梁韵娟, 杨超, 何建行, 李树本. 自体肺移植术在胸部恶性肿瘤中的临床应用[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 193-200.
阅读次数
全文


摘要