血清肿瘤分子标记物联合动态检测对肺癌诊疗的临床应用

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2019.02.010

目的

探讨血清肿瘤分子标记物癌胚抗原(CEA)、鳞状上皮癌抗原(Scc-Ag)、胃泌素释放肽前体31-98(Pro-GRP31-98)联合动态监测在肺癌早期诊断和监控治疗中的临床应用价值。

方法

选取156例肺癌患者(肺癌组)、50例肺部良性病变患者(良性对照组)及50例健康体检者(正常对照组)为研究对象，采用电化学发光法及酶联免疫法检测三组人群血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98水平，分析血清肿瘤分子标记物CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98在肺癌早期诊断、临床分期、病理组织学分型、监控复发转移及判断预后的相关性。

结果

(1)肺癌组患者血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98水平明显高于良性病变组及正常对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。良性病变组与正常对照组血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98水平比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)；(2)肺癌患者血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98水平与性别、年龄、肿瘤发生部位无明显相关性(均P>0.05)；与肿瘤大小、临床分期、组织学类型、复发转移及治疗后明显相关，肺癌高分期(Ⅲ、Ⅳ期)组、转移组、复发组、治疗前与低分期(Ⅰ、Ⅱ期)组、无转移组、无复发组、治疗后血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98水平相比较有明显增高(均P<0.01)；(3)CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98分别在肺腺癌、鳞癌、小细胞癌血清阳性检出率较高，与其它两种病理组织学类型比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)；(4)CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98诊断肺癌的敏感性分别为51.28%、48.72%、50.50%，特异性分别为96.00%、98.00%、94.00%，准确性分别为62.14%、60.68%、62.62%；两两组合CEA＋ Scc-Ag、CEA＋Pro-GRP31-98、Scc-Ag＋Pro-GRP31-98诊断肺癌的敏感性分别为61.54%、64.74%、62.18%，特异性分别为92.00%、90.00%、92.00%，准确性分别为69.27%、71.22%、69.76%；三项肿瘤分子标记物联合检测虽特异性有所降低(86.00%)，但敏感性、准确性明显提高，分别为96.46%、93.17%，与各单项及部分组合检测比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。

结论

肿瘤分子标记物CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98与肺癌的发生发展密切相关，联合检测可以做到相互补充、相互印证，有利于早期诊断、临床早期干预；动态检测可以监控肿瘤复发、转移，指导治疗及评估预后。

关键词: 支气管肺癌, 肿瘤分子标记物，血清学, 联合检测, 临床应用

Objective

To study the clinical value of dynamic detection of serum tumor molecular markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen tumor molecular markers (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (Scc Ag) and gastrin-releasing peptide precursor (Pro-GRP31-98), in the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Methods

The serum levels of CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 of 156 patients with lung cancer (lung cancer group), detected by electrochemical luminesence method (ECLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were compared with those of 50 patients with lung benign disease (lung benign group) and 50 people from health checkup (healthy control group) to analyze the clinical value of the three tumor markers in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Results

①In the lung cancer group, the levels of CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 were significantly higher than those of the lung benign group and the healthy control group (P<0.01). However, no significant difference was found between the lung benign group and the healthy control group (P>0.05). ②The levels of serum CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 in the lung cancer group had no correlation with the gender, age or tumor location (P>0.05), but had close correlations with the tumor size, clinical stage, histological type, recurrence, transfer and treatment (P<0.01). The serum levels of CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 in the lung cancer high differentiation group (Ⅲ and Ⅳ stages), transfer group, recurrence group, and pre-treatment group were significantly higher than those of the lung cancer low differentiation group (Ⅰ and Ⅱ stages), no metastasis group, no recurrence group, and post-treatment group (P<0.01). ③The serum CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 had respectively higher positive detection rates of lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma, and had a significant difference with the other two pathological types (P<0.01). ④The sensitivities of serum CEA, Scc Ag and Pro-GRP31-98 in the diagnosis of lung cancer were respectively 51.28%, 48.72% and 50.50%, the specificities were respectively 96.00%, 98.00% and 94.00%, and the accuracies were 62.14%, 60.68% and 62.62%, respectively. The sensitivities of CEA+ Scc-ag, CEA+ Pro-grp31-98, Scc-ag+ Pro-grp31-98 in the diagnosis of lung cancer were respectively 61.54%, 64.74% and 62.18%, the specificities were respectively 92.00%, 90.00% and 92.00%, and the accuracies were 69.27%, 71.22% and 69.76%, respectively. With the combined dynamic detection of the three serum tumor markers in the patients with lung cancer, the sensitivity and accuracy value reached 96.46% and 93.17%, respectively. It also had significant difference compared with single detection and pairwise combination detection (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Tumor markers CEA, scc-Ag and pro-grp31-98 are closely related to the occurrence and development of lung cancer. When they are combined with dynamic detection method, they can complement and reinforce each other, which is conducive to the early diagnosis and early clinical intervention. Dynamic detection can monitor the recurrence and metastasis of tumors, guiding the treatment and evaluating the prognosis.

Key words: Bronchogenic lung cancer, Tumor markers, serology, Combined detection, Clinical application

表1 三组血清肿瘤分子标记物水平比较(±s)

组　别	例数	CEA(ng/ml)	Scc-Ag(ng/ml)	Pro-GRP31-98(pg/ml)
肺癌组	156	53.26±19.37^a	33.64±15.79^a	115.36±62.34^a
良性对照组	50	1.89±0.96	0.97±0.23	15.84±3.69
正常对照组	50	1.87±0.89^b	0.95±0.22^b	15.23±3.12^b

表1 三组血清肿瘤分子标记物水平比较(±s)

组　别	例数	CEA(ng/ml)	Scc-Ag(ng/ml)	Pro-GRP31-98(pg/ml)
肺癌组	156	53.26±19.37^a	33.64±15.79^a	115.36±62.34^a
良性对照组	50	1.89±0.96	0.97±0.23	15.84±3.69
正常对照组	50	1.87±0.89^b	0.95±0.22^b	15.23±3.12^b

表2 肺癌患者不同临床病理因素血清肿瘤标记物水平比较(±s)

临床资料		例数	CEA(ng/ml)	Scc-Ag(ng/ml)	Pro-GRP31-98(pg/ml)
性别		?	?	?	?
?	男	89	54.69±20.06^a	32.26±13.67^a	117.82±63.28^a
?	女	67	52.80±18.76	52.80±16.25	112.71±60.37
年龄(岁)		?	?	?	?
?	≥50	92	53.96±19.67^a	34.27±15.87^a	113.29±61.27^a
?	<50	64	52.25±20.17	30.76±14.27	118.23±63.97
肿瘤部位		?	?	?	?
?	右肺	93	52.25±20.77^a	34.16±16.01^a	114.32±62.09^a
?	左肺	63	55.35±21.45	32.88±15.92	116.89±64.27
肿瘤直径		?	?	?	?
?	≥5 cm	106	62.43±25.14^b	40.12±17.24^b	137.24±69.36^b
?	<5 cm	50	33.82±12.76	27.16±10.17	69.42±32.41
病理组织学		?	?	?	?
?	腺癌	55	86.32±34.27^b	18.64±7.96	87.46±41.92
?	鳞癌	68	33.09±13.67	51.23±20.67^b	83.26±39.67
?	小细胞癌	33	39.41±15.27	23.67±9.25	228.24±92.37^b
临床分期		?	?	?	?
?	Ⅰ＋Ⅱ	67	29.27±10.64	18.73±6.32	57.38±22.37
?	Ⅲ＋Ⅳ	89	71.39±31.67^b	45.27±18.34^b	159.34±71.02^b
区域淋巴结转移		?	?	?	?
?	无	41	13.36±5.12	8.93±3.27	54.36±21.23
?	有	115	67.48±26.34^b	42.37±17.02^b	137.25±68.22^b
远处转移		?	?	?	?
?	无	133	44.33±17.69	23.61±8.64	79.23±32.37
?	有	23	104.49±46.12^b	90.31±32.89^b	326.34±116.34^b
复发		?	?	?	?
?	无	124	20.03±7.24	10.28±2.34	43.51±17.61
?	有	32	181.37±52.43^b	111.37±56.34^b	397.84±125.37^b
治疗		?	?	?	?
?	治疗前	156	53.26±19.37	33.64±15.79	115.36±62.34
?	治疗后	156	11.36±4.62^b	6.72±1.36^b	32.33±8.79^b

表2 肺癌患者不同临床病理因素血清肿瘤标记物水平比较(±s)

临床资料		例数	CEA(ng/ml)	Scc-Ag(ng/ml)	Pro-GRP31-98(pg/ml)
性别		?	?	?	?
?	男	89	54.69±20.06^a	32.26±13.67^a	117.82±63.28^a
?	女	67	52.80±18.76	52.80±16.25	112.71±60.37
年龄(岁)		?	?	?	?
?	≥50	92	53.96±19.67^a	34.27±15.87^a	113.29±61.27^a
?	<50	64	52.25±20.17	30.76±14.27	118.23±63.97
肿瘤部位		?	?	?	?
?	右肺	93	52.25±20.77^a	34.16±16.01^a	114.32±62.09^a
?	左肺	63	55.35±21.45	32.88±15.92	116.89±64.27
肿瘤直径		?	?	?	?
?	≥5 cm	106	62.43±25.14^b	40.12±17.24^b	137.24±69.36^b
?	<5 cm	50	33.82±12.76	27.16±10.17	69.42±32.41
病理组织学		?	?	?	?
?	腺癌	55	86.32±34.27^b	18.64±7.96	87.46±41.92
?	鳞癌	68	33.09±13.67	51.23±20.67^b	83.26±39.67
?	小细胞癌	33	39.41±15.27	23.67±9.25	228.24±92.37^b
临床分期		?	?	?	?
?	Ⅰ＋Ⅱ	67	29.27±10.64	18.73±6.32	57.38±22.37
?	Ⅲ＋Ⅳ	89	71.39±31.67^b	45.27±18.34^b	159.34±71.02^b
区域淋巴结转移		?	?	?	?
?	无	41	13.36±5.12	8.93±3.27	54.36±21.23
?	有	115	67.48±26.34^b	42.37±17.02^b	137.25±68.22^b
远处转移		?	?	?	?
?	无	133	44.33±17.69	23.61±8.64	79.23±32.37
?	有	23	104.49±46.12^b	90.31±32.89^b	326.34±116.34^b
复发		?	?	?	?
?	无	124	20.03±7.24	10.28±2.34	43.51±17.61
?	有	32	181.37±52.43^b	111.37±56.34^b	397.84±125.37^b
治疗		?	?	?	?
?	治疗前	156	53.26±19.37	33.64±15.79	115.36±62.34
?	治疗后	156	11.36±4.62^b	6.72±1.36^b	32.33±8.79^b

表3 血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98在肺癌各组织学类型中阳性检出率比较 [n(%)]

检测项目	腺癌(n＝55)	鳞癌(n＝68)	小细胞癌(n＝33)
CEA	37(67.27)^a	18(26.47)	9(27.27)
Scc-Ag	14(25.45)	47(69.12)^a	6(18.18)
Pro-GRP31-98	15(27.27)	16(23.53)	25(75.76)^a

表3 血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98在肺癌各组织学类型中阳性检出率比较 [n(%)]

检测项目	腺癌(n＝55)	鳞癌(n＝68)	小细胞癌(n＝33)
CEA	37(67.27)^a	18(26.47)	9(27.27)
Scc-Ag	14(25.45)	47(69.12)^a	6(18.18)
Pro-GRP31-98	15(27.27)	16(23.53)	25(75.76)^a

表4 血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98单项及联合检测诊断肺癌的价值比较(%)

检测项目	敏感性	特异性	准确性	阳性预测值	阴性预测值
CEA	51.28	96.00	62.14	97.56	38.71
Scc-Ag	48.72	98.00	60.68	98.70	37.98
Pro-GRP31-98	50.50	94.00	62.62	96.47	38.84
CEA＋ Scc-Ag	61.54	92.00	69.27	96.00	43.40
CEA＋ Pro-GRP31-98	64.74	90.00	71.22	95.28	45.00
Scc-Ag＋ Pro-GRP31-98	62.18	92.00	69.76	96.04	43.81
CEA ＋ Scc-Ag＋Pro-GRP31-98	96.46^a	86.00	93.17^a	95.48	84.31^a

表4 血清CEA、Scc-Ag、Pro-GRP31-98单项及联合检测诊断肺癌的价值比较(%)

检测项目	敏感性	特异性	准确性	阳性预测值	阴性预测值
CEA	51.28	96.00	62.14	97.56	38.71
Scc-Ag	48.72	98.00	60.68	98.70	37.98
Pro-GRP31-98	50.50	94.00	62.62	96.47	38.84
CEA＋ Scc-Ag	61.54	92.00	69.27	96.00	43.40
CEA＋ Pro-GRP31-98	64.74	90.00	71.22	95.28	45.00
Scc-Ag＋ Pro-GRP31-98	62.18	92.00	69.76	96.04	43.81
CEA ＋ Scc-Ag＋Pro-GRP31-98	96.46^a	86.00	93.17^a	95.48	84.31^a

1	钱桂生. 肺癌不同病理类型发病率的变化情况及其原因[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(1):1-6.
2	Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Clobal cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2):74-108.
3	Xie Y, Todd NW, Liu Z, et al. Altered mi RNA exepression in sputum for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2010, 67(2):170-176.
4	Wang G, Qin Y, Zhang J, et al. Nipple Discharge of CA15-3, CA125, CEA and TSGF as a New Biomarker Panel for Breast Cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2014, 15(6):9546-9565.
5	丛玉隆，尹一兵，陈瑜. 检验医学高级教程[M]. 北京：人民军医出版社，2012: 52-60.
6	叶清，蒋捍东. 肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物水平变化与化疗疗效及生存时间的相关性[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2013, 6(6):500-503.
7	王刚平，田玉峰，徐风亮，等. 乳腺癌及前驱病变肿瘤分子标记物联合动态监测的研究与临床应用[J]. 医学检验与临床，2013, 24(5):1-4.
8	Hatzakis KD, Froudarakis ME, Bouros D, et al. Prognostic value of serum tumor markers in patients with lung cancer[J]. Respiration, 2002, 69:9-25.
9	Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2012, 76(2):138-143.
10	Hanagiri T, Sugaya M, Takenaka M, et al. Preoperative CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as prognostic factors in patients with stage I non-small cell lung Cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2011, 74(1):112-117.
11	Li X, Asmitananda T, Gao L, et al. Biomarkers in the lung cancer diagnosis：a clinical perspective[J]. Neoplasma, 2012, 59(5):500-507.
12	洪萍，刘爱英. 四种肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌诊断、治疗检测及判断预后的价值[J]. 临床肺科杂志，2012, 17(4):677-679.
13	曾显声，周燕斌. 肺癌血清肿瘤标记物的研究现状[J]. 国际内科学杂志，2007, 34(2):73.
14	Okamura K, Takayama K, Izumi M, et al. Diagnostic value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 tumour markers in primary lung cancer[J]. Lung cancer, 2013, 80(1):45-49.
15	曾聪，全国莉，王春莲. 联合检测6种血清肿瘤标记物在肺癌诊断中的意义[J]. 广东医学，2012, 33(6):808-810.
16	郭秀娟，张金艳，魏媛媛，等. 肺癌患者血清CEA、SCC-Ag、CYFRA21-1及NSE与三种肺癌病理分型间的相关性研究[J]. 河北医药，2014, 36(22):3391-3393.
17	Kagohashi K, Satoh H, Kurishima K, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in lung cancer and nonmalignant respiratory diseases[J]. Lung, 2008, 186(5):323-326.
18	周扬，高静，贾兴旺，等. 鳞癌相关抗原在鳞癌及相关良性疾病中的临床意义[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床，2010, 17(3):137-140.
19	赵莉，李明. 肿瘤标志物检验在肺癌诊断中的临床价值分析[J]. 中外医学研究，2012, 10(2):50-51.
20	Schneider J, Neu K, Grimm H, et al. Tumor-M2 pyruvate kinase in lung cancer patients: immunohistochemical detection and disease monitoring[J]. Anticancer Res, 2002, 22(1A):311-318.
21	Soletormos G, Duffy MJ, Hayes DF, et al. Design of tumor biomarker-monitoring trials: a proposal by the European Group on Tumor Markers[J]. Clin Chem, 2013, 59(1):52-59.
22	Lamy PJ, Grenier J, Kramar A, et al. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, neuron specific enolas e and chromogranin A as serum markers of small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2000, 29(3):197-203.
23	李德经，宁国兰，柳兆飞，等. ProGRP和NSE对小细胞肺癌的诊断及疗效评估的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志，2016, 32(5):754-758.
24	武静. 胃泌素释放肽前体对SCLC诊治的临床意义[J]. 中国药物与临床，2009, 9(10):940-943.
25	华彬，阿合提别克塔布斯，陆旭，等. 血清肿瘤标记物B2微球蛋白、癌胚抗原、CA153和CA125检测对乳腺癌临床实践的意义探讨[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(3):153-158.
26	Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(36):9304-9308.
27	Degoute CS, Ray MJ, Gueugniauel PT, et al. Remifentanil Induces Consistent Controlled Hypotension in Children during Middle Ear Surgery[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2003, 50(3):270-276.
28	谢明水，刘扬，陈丹丹，等. 甲胎蛋白异质体3、高尔基体蛋白73、磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3在原发性肝癌诊断中的价值[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床，2013, 25:730-732.
29	缪林，张文先，刘政，等. 联合检测血清CA199、CA125、CEA对胃癌诊断价值[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志，2002, 11(23):2315-2316.
30	郭成业，闫春，于文军，等. 联合检测血清CA724、CA199和CEA对胃癌临床价值的探讨[J]. 中国肿瘤临床杂志，2007, 27(11):776-777.
31	徐日，徐风亮. 肿瘤分子标志物联合动态检测在肺癌中的临床应用[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床，2014, 26(11):744-748.
32	王会中，任成山，金发光. 肿瘤生物标志物在肺癌患者检测中的临床意义及研究进展[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(3):329-333.

[1]	王淑君, 张楚晗, 唐一阳, 赵雨桐, 李佳伦, 付佳乐. 自粘接树脂水门汀的临床应用及展望[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 276-286.
[2]	张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[3]	陶银花, 张红杰, 王亚岚, 陈莲, 张珺. 间歇式气压治疗预防肺癌化疗下肢深静脉血栓的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 605-608.
[4]	任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[5]	林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[6]	殷国青, 曾莉, 贺斌峰, 孙芬芬. Rab26负性调控Nrf2增强肺癌耐药细胞对奥希替尼的敏感性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 349-355.
[7]	邓世君, 刘晓青, 刘权兴. 信息化管理在肺癌围手术期中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 466-468.
[8]	张剑, 卢从华, 李江华, 林采余, 吴迪, 王治国, 聂乃夫, 何勇, 李力. 根据转录组学分析奥希替尼获得性耐药机制的研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 195-200.
[9]	吕欣谕, 李雯, 王娟侠, 邹维, 王艳, 雷杰. 围手术期肺康复训练在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 256-259.
[10]	陈羽霞, 柏佩梅, 芦遥遥. 综合干预对肺癌化疗患者的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 307-309.
[11]	胡航, 陈婷婷, 孙健, 孙云浩, 仇丽敏. 三维重建技术在单操作孔胸腔镜肺段切除术的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 310-312.
[12]	拉周措毛, 山春玲, 李国蓉, 华毛. 青海西宁地区IPF-LC的病理类型及临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 25-29.
[13]	张蕊, 李敏, 饶建玲. 肺癌患者癌因性疲乏现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 111-114.
[14]	戚泽雪, 赵连晖, 王广川, 张春清. 从国内专家共识推荐意见更新探讨经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的临床应用进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 193-196.
[15]	王睿浩, 姜云璐, 田艳君. Apelin/APJ系统生理病理作用的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 138-142.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical value of dynamic detection of tumor molecular markers in serum in patients with lung cancer

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical value of dynamic detection of tumor molecular markers in serum in patients with lung cancer