切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 17 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2021.01.004

论著

晚期肺腺癌患者维持治疗中EGFR-TKI联合放疗的回顾性分析
王康1, 胡雪婷1, 罗虎1, 周向东1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-25 出版日期:2021-02-25
  • 通信作者: 周向东
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然青年基金资助项目(81702293); 校临床科研重点项目(2018XLC2002); 校临床科研人才专项(2019XLC1002)

Retrospective study of EGFR-TKI combined with radiotherapy in maintenance therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

Kang Wang1, Xueting Hu1, Hu Luo1, Xiangdong Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Respiratory, Xinan Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2020-09-25 Published:2021-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiangdong Zhou
引用本文:

王康, 胡雪婷, 罗虎, 周向东. 晚期肺腺癌患者维持治疗中EGFR-TKI联合放疗的回顾性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 17-23.

Kang Wang, Xueting Hu, Hu Luo, Xiangdong Zhou. Retrospective study of EGFR-TKI combined with radiotherapy in maintenance therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(01): 17-23.

目的

探讨EGFR突变阳性的晚期肺腺癌患者经EGFR-TKI诱导治疗后,以EGFR-TKI联合胸部放疗作为维持治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

收集陆军军医大学西南医院2012年1月至2019年7月收治的EGFR突变阳性、接受一线EGFR-TKI治疗并达到疾病稳定的晚期肺腺癌患者的临床资料,EGFR-TKI诱导治疗达疾病稳定后联合胸部放疗维持为联合治疗组,单药TKI维持为单药治疗组。对两组患者的无进展生存期(PFS)、缓解持续时间(DOR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良反应进行回顾性分析。

结果

共收集符合标准的患者178例,其中联合治疗组23例,单药治疗组155例,经过倾向性得分匹配(PSM)1︰1匹配后,配对成功21对。两组在临床资料基线水平一致(P>0.05),两组的中位PFS分别为19.8个月和12.3个月(P=0.000),中位DOR分别为16.5个月和9.8个月(P=0.002),ORR分别为85.7%和76.2%(P=0.687),DCR都是100%,3级及以上不良反应分别为5例(23.8%)、4例(19.0%)。两组共同的不良反应相差不大,最常见的为皮疹,分别为9例(42.8%)和10例(47.6%)。联合治疗组出现放射性肺炎11例(52.4%),其中1级10例,2级1例。

结论

一线EGFR-TKI诱导治疗后,EGFR-TKI联合胸部放疗维持治疗比EGFR-TKI单药维持治疗有更好的PFS获益,并且联合组安全性可耐受。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKI combined with thoracic radiotherapy as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with positive EGFR mutation after induction therapy of EGFR-TKI.

Method

Collecting the clinical characteristic of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with positive EGFR mutation admitted to southwest Hospital of Army Military Medical University from January 2012 to July 2019, who received first-line EGFR-TKI treatment and achieved disease stability. Patients who underwent EGFR-TKI induction therapy to achieve disease stabilization and then maintained by thoracic radiotherapy were treated as the combined treatment group, maintained with monotherapeutic TKI were treated as the monotherapy group. Progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate(DCR)and adverse reactions of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 178 patients met the criteria were collected, including 23 patients in the combined treatment group and 155 patients in the monotherapy group. 21 pairs were matched successfully after the propensity score matching at a ratio of 1︰1, Baselines of two groups of patients were consistent (P>0.05). Median PFS was 19.8 months in the combined treatment group and 12.3 months in the monotherapy group(P=0.000). The median DOR was 16.5 months and 9.8 months, respectively(P=0.002). ORR of two group was 85.7% and 76.2%(P=0.687). DOR were 100% in both groups.Grade 3 or worse adverse reactions were 5 cases (23.8%) and 4 cases (19.0%), respectively. The common adverse reactions of the two groups were not significantly different, and the most common was rash, 9 (42.8%) and 10 (47.6%) respectively. In the combined treatment group, there were 11 cases (52.4%) of radioactive pneumonia, including 10 cases of grade 1 and 1 case of grade 2.

Conclusion

After first-line EGFR-TKI induction therapy, EGFR-TKI combined with thoracic radiotherapy maintenance therapy showed better PFS benefit than EGFR-TKI single-drug maintenance therapy and the combination therapy group had a safety tolerance.

表1 联合组与单药组临床资料对比(匹配前)(%)
表2 联合组与单药组临床资料对比(匹配后)(%)
图1 两组患者无进展生存期曲线
图2 两组患者客观缓解持续时间曲线
图3 靶病灶大小较基线变化的最佳百分比
表3 两组患者治疗反应情况(%)
表4 两组患者不良反应比较[n(%)]
1
钱桂生. 肺癌不同病理类型发病率的变化情况及其原因[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2011, 4(1): 1-5.
2
张瑞婕,戢福云,钱桂生,等. 接触蛋白-1在原发性肺鳞状细胞癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(2): 139-143.
3
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
4
Ettinger D, Aisner D, Wood D, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2018[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(7): 807-821.
5
Kriegs M, Gurtner K, Can Y, et al. Radiosensitization of NSCLC cells by EGFR inhibition is the result of an enhanced p53-dependent G1 arrest [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2015, 115(1): 120-127.
6
Chinnaiyan P, Huang S, Vallabhaneni G, et al. Mechanisms of enhanced radiation response following epidermal growth factor receptor signaling inhibition by erlotinib (Tarceva)[J]. Cancer Res, 2005, 65(8): 3328-3335.
7
Chang CC, Chi KH, Kao SJ, et al. Upfront gefitinib/erlotinib treatment followed by concomitant radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer: A mono-institutional experience[J]. Lung cancer, 2011, 73(2): 189-194.
8
Zheng L, Wang Y, Xu Z, et al. Concurrent EGFR-TKI and thoracic radiotherapy as first-line treatment for stage Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR active mutations [J]. Oncologist, 2019, 24(8): 1031.
9
Martínez E, Rico M, Martínez M, et al. Feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of the concurrent addition of erlotinib to thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a Phase Ⅱ trial[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016, 9(1): 1057-1066.
10
Johnson ML, Patel JD. Chemotherapy and targeted therapeutics as maintenance of response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Semin Oncol, 2014, 41(1): 93-100.
11
Gautschi O, Rothschild SI, Li Q, et al. Bevacizumab plus pemetrexed versus pemetrexed alone as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: update from the swiss group for clinical cancer research (SAKK) 19/09 trial[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2017, 18(3): 303-309.
12
Paz-Ares L, De Marinis F, Dediu M, et al. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(3): 247-255.
13
Lamberti G, Andrini E, Sisi M, et al. Beyond EGFR, ALK and ROS1: Current evidence and future perspectives on newly targetable oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2020, 156(4): 103-119.
14
Dall′olio F, Conci N, Rossi G, et al. Comparison of sequential testing and next generation sequencing in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients-A single centre experience[J]. Lung Cancer, 2020, 149(11): 5-9.
15
Mack P, Banks K, Espenschied C, et al. Spectrum of driver mutations and clinical impact of circulating tumor DNA analysis in non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of over 8000 cases[J]. Cancer, 2020, 126(14): 3219-3228.
16
Shi Y, Au JSK, Thongprasert S, et al. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER)[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2014, 9(2): 154-162.
17
Midha A, Dearden S, Mccormack R, et al. EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity (mutMapII)[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2015, 5(9): 2892-2911.
18
Lee K, Kim Y, Jung HA, et al. Repeat biopsy procedures and T790M rates after afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib therapy in patients with lung cancer[J]. Lung cancer, 2019, 130: 87-92.
19
李 静,武新虎,王 振,等. 电离辐射降低NSCLC细胞株T790M突变所致TKI耐药[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2015, 18(8): 475-480.
20
Huang Y, Wang Y, Hu D, et al. The influence of pemetrexed-based continuous maintenance therapy on survival of locally advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7(20): 524.
21
Qi J, Guo X, Li A, et al. Doublet vs single-agent maintenance therapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2020, 14(3): 2179-2185.
22
Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study[J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9699): 1432-1440.
23
Mayne N, Lin B, Darling A, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus delayed surgery for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 272(6): 925-929.
24
Peng X, Long X, Liu L, et al. Clinical impact of uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 insertion-deletion variants on epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2020, 141(7): 199-208.
25
Nelson D, Rice D, Niu J, et al. Long-term survival outcomes of cancer-directed surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: propensity score matching analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(29): 3354-3362.
26
Francis S, Orton A, Stoddard G, et al. Sequencing of postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced or incompletely resected non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(4): 333-341.
27
Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(8): 735-742.
28
Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(25): 2380-2388.
29
Urata Y, Katakami N, Morita S, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ study comparing gefitinib with erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(27): 3248-3257.
30
Wang Y, Li Y, Xia L, et al. Continued EGFR-TKI with concurrent radiotherapy to improve time to progression (TTP) in patients with locally progressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after front-line EGFR-TKI treatment [J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2017, 20(3): 366-373.
31
Wang L, He Z, Yang S, et al. The impact of previous therapy strategy on the efficiency of anlotinib hydrochloride as a third-line treatment on patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a subgroup analysis of ALTER0303 trial[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2019, 8(5): 575-583.
32
Hu F, Xu J, Zhang B, et al. Efficacy of local consolidative therapy for oligometastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2019, 20(1): e81-e90.
[1] 赵鑫, 郝磊, 朱丽静, 土继政, 王博娟, 张凯, 王兴华. 超声造影评价肺腺癌与肺鳞癌血流灌注特征的价值研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1181-1185.
[2] 刘静, 徐爽, 缪亚军. 肺腺癌miR-3653表达与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染及预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 600-604.
[3] 郑琪, 马婕群, 张彦兵, 廖子君, 张锐. EPHA5突变预测肺腺癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗预后的临床意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 548-552.
[4] 贾乃龙, 李传资, 王绥煌, 张余鹏, 林志华, 林昌昆, 黄垂志. 低剂量能谱CT结合多平面重建技术对肺癌和肺炎性结节鉴别诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 247-251.
[5] 杨伟光, 喇焕之, 张元桢. 营养状态及血液常规指标对肺腺癌免疫不良反应的预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 829-832.
[6] 汪沛, 倪蓓君, 元及, 宫为一, 范军. 卡瑞利珠单抗联合卡铂和培美曲塞治疗进展期肺腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 511-513.
[7] 邱静, 黄庆. HJURP在肺腺癌组织中高表达并与患者不良预后相关性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 495-499.
[8] 郝昭昭, 李多, 南岩东. 以肺磨玻璃结节为表现的肺腺癌发生机制研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 435-437.
[9] 王迪, 吕少诚, 黄金灿, 潘飞, 姜涛, 郎韧. 肺腺癌胰腺转移伴门静脉侵犯一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 457-460.
[10] 吴迪, 闫志风, 李明霞, 孟元光. 晚期子宫内膜癌免疫治疗的探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 231-237.
[11] 郑旭, 韩燕燕, 高珊, 李翀. 基于非标记定量蛋白质组学技术分析消岩汤干预人肺腺癌细胞后蛋白表达谱特征的影响[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 18-23.
[12] 毛媛媛, 殷曰帅, 宓兵, 胡效坤. CT引导下经皮穿刺肺腺癌微波消融后致巨大空洞一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 287-288.
[13] 申磊磊, 刘有, 宁浩勇, 云天洋, 侯小明, 郭俊唐, 梁朝阳, 刘阳. 第8版肺癌TNM分期亚实性结节T分期建议方案的验证[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 40-52.
[14] 李世浩, 李子豪, 董博, 吴春莉, 吴彬, 盛银良, 齐宇. 胞质分裂蛋白调节因子1对肺腺癌细胞迁移、侵袭和增殖的影响[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 164-175.
[15] 陈笑, 柳常青, 周杭城, 李田, 孙效辉, 吴明胜, 徐粮东, 徐美青, 解明然. 肺腺癌气腔播散的研究现状[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 126-130.
阅读次数
全文


摘要