切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 539 -543. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2019.05.001

论著

恩度和顺铂治疗原发性肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液的短期疗效对比分析
王洲飞1, 许子寒1, 朱广阔1, 卓文磊1, 陈正堂1,()   
  1. 1. 400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)新桥医院全军肿瘤研究所
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-08 出版日期:2019-10-20
  • 通信作者: 陈正堂
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81672841)

Clinical analysis of intrapleural therapy with endostar or cisplatin for primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion

Zhoufei Wang1, Zihan Xu1, Guangkuo Zhu1, Wenlei Zhuo1, Zhengtang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Cancer Research Institute of PLA, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2019-05-08 Published:2019-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Zhengtang Chen
引用本文:

王洲飞, 许子寒, 朱广阔, 卓文磊, 陈正堂. 恩度和顺铂治疗原发性肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液的短期疗效对比分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(05): 539-543.

Zhoufei Wang, Zihan Xu, Guangkuo Zhu, Wenlei Zhuo, Zhengtang Chen. Clinical analysis of intrapleural therapy with endostar or cisplatin for primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(05): 539-543.

目的

回顾性分析69例肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液(malignant pleural effusion, MPE)患者的临床资料,探讨恩度与顺铂胸腔内灌注治疗肺癌合并MPE的短期疗效和不良反应。

方法

收集陆军军医大学新桥医院2016年至2018年6月收治的69例肺癌合并MPE患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法的不同,分为恩度组23例,顺铂组46例。两组治疗前均已排尽胸水,恩度组胸腔灌注恩度30 mg,每周2次,顺铂组胸腔灌注顺铂30 mg/m2,每周2次,比较两种药物的疗效及不良反应的差异。

结果

恩度组的客观有效率(objective response rate, ORR)为56.5%,顺铂组ORR为26.1%。恩度组的治疗效果显著优于顺铂组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。分层分析发现,在血性胸腔积液患者中,恩度组ORR 88.9%,顺铂组ORR 5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在非血性胸腔积液患者中,恩度组ORR 35.7%,顺铂组ORR 42.3%。胸腔积液中癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA)数值较低(<100 μg/L)的患者中,恩度组ORR 53.8%,顺铂组ORR 8.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。胸腔积液中CEA数值较高(≥100 μg/L)的患者中,恩度组ORR 50%,顺铂组ORR 45.4%。

结论

恩度胸腔内灌注治疗原发性肺癌合并MPE是一种安全有效的治疗方法,疗效优于顺铂,尤其对于血性胸腔积液患者、胸腔积液中CEA数值较低(<100 μg/L)的患者,效果更为明显。且恩度组较顺铂组不良反应更小,安全性好,能明显改善患者生活质量。

Objective

To analyze the clinical data of 69 patients with primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and explore the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of endostar and cisplatin in the treatment of lung cancer mediated MPE through intrapleural injection.

Methods

The clinical data of 69 patients with lung cancer mediated MPE in our hospital from 2016 to June 2018 were collected for this study. They were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic regimen: 23 cases were treated with endostar (30 mg through intrapleural injection, twice a week) and the rest 46 cases were treated with cisplatin (30 mg/m2 through intrapleural injection, twice a week). The curative effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed and analyzed.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.5% in the endostar group, which was significantly higher than that in the cisplatin group (26.1%, P<0.05). Stratified analysis showed that in the patients with bloody pleural effusion, the ORRs were 88.9% in the endostar group and 5% in the cisplatin group, and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). In the patients with non-bloody pleural effusion, the ORRs were 35.7% in the endostar group and 42.3% in the cisplatin group. In the patients with lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values (<100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion, the ORRs were 53.8% in the endostar group and 8.3% in the cisplatin group, and statistical significant difference was found between the two groups (P<0.05). In the patients with higher CEA values (>100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion, the ORRs were 50% in the endostar group and 45.4% in the cisplatin group.

Conclusion

Intrapleural therapy of endostar is a safe and effective method for the patients with lung cancer mediated MPE, which shows a higher curative rate than that of cisplatin. The therapeutic effect is more obvious especially for the patients with bloody pleural effusion and the patients with lower CEA values (<100 μg/L) in the pleural effusion. And the endostar group has less adverse reactions and better safety than the cisplatin group. Furthermore, endostar can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients.

表1 两组患者的临床特征
表2 两组短期疗效对比
表3 胸腔积液性状不同时两组患者疗效对比
表4 胸腔积液中癌胚抗原计数不同时两组患者疗效对比
表5 两组患者的不良反应对比
1
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
2
Ma Y, Kang S, Wu X, et al. Up-regulated HMGB1 in the pleural effusion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients reduces the chemosensitivity of NSCLC cells[J]. Tumori, 2018, 104(5): 338-343.
3
Chen D, Song X, Zhang Y, et al. Optimizing intrapleural bevacizumab dosing in non-small-cell lung cancer-mediated malignant pleural effusion: less is more[J]. Future Oncol, 2018, 14(21): 2131-2138.
4
Xu L, Wang B, Gao M, et al. Intrapleural combination therapy with lobaplatin and erythromycin for non-small cell lung cancer-mediated malignant pleural effusion[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2018, 9(8): 950-955.
5
Wang QT, Zhang ZL, Xiong H, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of elemene in treating malignant pleural effusion caused by tumors: A PRISMA guided meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(44): e12542.
6
Pan Y, Bai W, Chen J, et al. Diagnosing malignant pleural effusion using clinical and analytical parameters[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018: e22689.
7
Desai NR, Lee HJ. Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: state of the art in 2017[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(Suppl 10): S1111-S1122.
8
Zhang F, Wang J, Zheng X, et al. Clinical value of jointly detection pleural fluid Midkine, pleural fluid adenosine deaminase, and pleural fluid carbohydrate antigen 125 in the identification of nonsmall cell lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018, 32(8): e22576.
9
Wu SG, Liu YN, Yu CJ, et al. Driver mutations of young lung adenocarcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusion[J]. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2018, 57(10): 513-521.
10
秦叔逵,杨柳青,梁 军,等. 腔内应用重组人血管内皮抑制素和/或顺铂治疗恶性胸腹腔积液的前瞻性、随机对照、全国多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2017, 22(3): 193-202.
11
Popper HH. Progression and metastasis of lung cancer[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2016, 35(1): 75-91.
12
Gorospe-Sarasua L, Arrieta P, Munoz-Molina GM, et al. Oncologic thoracic emergencies of patients with lung cancer[J]. Rev Clin Esp, 2019, 219(1): 44-50.
13
Liu Z, Wu Y, Tao Z, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Hakai regulates cell growth and invasion, and increases the chemosensitivity to cisplatin in nonsmallcell lung cancer cells[J]. Int J Mol Med, 2018, 42(2): 1145-1151.
14
Yu ZW, Ju YH, Yang CL, et al. Antitumor effect of recombinant human endostatin combined with cisplatin on rats with transplanted Lewis lung cancer[J]. Asian Pac J Trop Med, 2015, 8(8): 664-667.
15
Pu Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. The therapeuatic effect of Endostar on soft carotid plaque neovascularization in patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 8956.
16
Sonpavde G, Bellmunt J. Bladder cancer: Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in urothelial carcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2016, 13(6): 306-307.
17
Jin Y, Wei L, Jiang Q, et al. Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab, endostar and apatinib in transgenic and human lung cancer xenograftzebrafish model[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 15837.
18
Mohammed KA, Nasreen N, Hardwick J, et al. Bacterial induction of pleural mesothelial monolayer barrier dysfunction[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2001, 281(1): L119-L125.
19
Qin T, Huang D, Liu Z, et al. Tumor necrosis factor superfamily 15 promotes lymphatic metastasis via upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-C in a mouse model of lung cancer[J]. Cancer Sci, 2018, 109(8): 2469-2478.
20
Grove CS, Lee YC. Vascular endothelial growth factor: the key mediator in pleural effusion formation[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2002, 8(4): 294-301.
21
Chen Y, Mathy NW, Lu H. The role of VEGF in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (Review)[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2018, 17(6): 8019-8030.
22
Heffner JE. Management of the patient with a malignant pleural effusion [J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2010, 31(6): 723-733.
23
Clive AO, Kahan BC, Hooper CE, et al. Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score[J]. Thorax, 2014, 69(12): 1098-1104.
24
施焕中,张予辉. 《恶性胸腔积液诊断与治疗专家共识》解读[J]. 中华医学信息导报,2014, 29(9): doi 10.3760/j.issn.1000-8039.2014.09.011
25
Wei H, Qin S, Yin X, et al. Endostar inhibits ascites formation and prolongs survival in mouse models of malignant ascites[J]. Oncol Lett, 2015, 9(6): 2694-2700.
26
陈 红,何 朗. Rh-Endostatin抗血管生成及与其他疗法联合抗肿瘤的研究进展[J]. 西部医学,2016, 28(6): 885-888.
27
Du N, Li X, Li F, et al. Intrapleural combination therapy with bevacizumab and cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancermediated malignant pleural effusion[J]. Oncol Rep, 2013, 29(6): 2332-2340.
28
吕 远,姜 镕,马春华,等. 重组人血管内皮抑制素静脉持续泵入联合窗口期动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肺鳞癌的临床观察[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2015, 18(8): 500-504.
29
An J, Lv W. Endostar (rh-endostatin) versus placebo in combination with vinorelbine plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2018, 9(5): 606-612.
30
Yao D, Shen H, Huang J, et al. Influence of different drug delivery methods for Endostar combined with a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen in locally advanced or metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(32): e11822.
[1] 赵向阳, 刘双池, 张懿刚, 陶滔, 谈燚. 顺铂对肝细胞癌Hep3B细胞程序性死亡配体1表达及药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 51-55.
[2] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[3] 陶银花, 张红杰, 王亚岚, 陈莲, 张珺. 间歇式气压治疗预防肺癌化疗下肢深静脉血栓的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 605-608.
[4] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[5] 林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[6] 殷国青, 曾莉, 贺斌峰, 孙芬芬. Rab26负性调控Nrf2增强肺癌耐药细胞对奥希替尼的敏感性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 349-355.
[7] 邓世君, 刘晓青, 刘权兴. 信息化管理在肺癌围手术期中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 466-468.
[8] 吕欣谕, 李雯, 王娟侠, 邹维, 王艳, 雷杰. 围手术期肺康复训练在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 256-259.
[9] 刘康, 洪礼虎, 刘根, 彭力, 李祥攀. 复方红豆杉胶囊联合GP化疗对晚期NSCLC疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 284-287.
[10] 陈羽霞, 柏佩梅, 芦遥遥. 综合干预对肺癌化疗患者的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 307-309.
[11] 胡航, 陈婷婷, 孙健, 孙云浩, 仇丽敏. 三维重建技术在单操作孔胸腔镜肺段切除术的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 310-312.
[12] 张剑, 卢从华, 李江华, 林采余, 吴迪, 王治国, 聂乃夫, 何勇, 李力. 根据转录组学分析奥希替尼获得性耐药机制的研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 195-200.
[13] 拉周措毛, 山春玲, 李国蓉, 华毛. 青海西宁地区IPF-LC的病理类型及临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 25-29.
[14] 朱斯悦, 张晓莹, 严玉茹, 陈绯. 介入支气管镜在肺部疾病诊断和治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 148-151.
[15] 张蕊, 李敏, 饶建玲. 肺癌患者癌因性疲乏现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 111-114.
阅读次数
全文


摘要