切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 877 -879. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2023.06.031

短篇论著

肿瘤标志物在肺癌鉴别诊断中的预测价值
洪俊(), 张春来, 鲍黄胜   
  1. 231500 庐江,安徽省庐江县人民医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-07 出版日期:2023-12-25
  • 通信作者: 洪俊

Predictive value of tumor markers in differential diagnosis of lung cancer

Jun Hong(), Chunlai Zhang, Huangsheng Bao   

  • Received:2023-10-07 Published:2023-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Jun Hong
引用本文:

洪俊, 张春来, 鲍黄胜. 肿瘤标志物在肺癌鉴别诊断中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 877-879.

Jun Hong, Chunlai Zhang, Huangsheng Bao. Predictive value of tumor markers in differential diagnosis of lung cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(06): 877-879.

肺癌(carcinoma of the lungs)是严重威胁人类生命健康的恶性肿瘤,发病率和病死率全球范围位居第一[1,2]。多数发现时已进入晚期,5年生存率低[3,4,5]。肺癌病理类型分为非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)及小细胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer, SCLC),快速确定病理分型是提高肺癌生存率、改善预后的关键[6,7]。血清肿瘤标志物为无创检查,对肺癌诊断、治疗及预后有临床意义[8,9,10]。癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron specific enolase, NSE)、细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin 19 fragment, CYFRA21-1)是原发性肺癌诊疗中常见血清肿瘤标志物,联合检测在鉴别诊断不同病理分型肺癌中报道尚少[11,12,13]。本文对我院收治的46例肺癌患者CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1联合检测进行分析,报道如下。

表1 肺癌患者的一般资料结果比较[n(%)]
表2 CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平比较(±s,ng/ml)
表3 多因素Logistic回归分析
表4 不同病理分型肺癌鉴别诊断价值
1
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
2
王洪武,金发光. 晚期非小细胞肺癌多域整合治疗策略[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(4): 457-461.
3
Nooreldeen R, Bach H. Current and future development in lung cancer diagnosis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(16): 8661.
4
Potter AL, Rosenstein AL, Kiang MV, et al. Association of computed tomography screening with lung cancer stage shift and survival in the United States: quasi-experimental study[J]. BMJ, 2022, 376: e069008.
5
Araujo LH, Baldotto CS, Monteiro MR, et al. Patient-centered outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world perspective[J]. Future Oncol, 2021, 17(14): 1721-1733.
6
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(1): 7-33.
7
陈 菁,刘 旭,杨 硕,等. 经支气管镜针吸活检联合多标志物检测在肺癌病理分型中的应用价值[J]. 中国医科大学学报2019, 48(4): 342-345.
8
Jiang C, Zhao M, Hou S, et al. The indicative value of serum tumor markers for metastasis and stage of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(20): 5064.
9
Bi H, Yin L, Fang W, et al. Association of CEA, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP with clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapeutic outcomes of lung cancer[J]. Lab Med, 2023, 54(4): 372-379.
10
Bodor JN, Boumber Y, Borghaei H. Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J]. Cancer, 2020, 126(2): 260-270.
11
国家癌症中心,国家肿瘤质控中心肺癌质控专家委员会. 中国原发性肺癌规范诊疗质量控制指标(2022版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志2022, 44(7): 594-599.
12
Gao S, Zhang G, Lian Y, et al. Exploration and analysis of the value of tumor-marker joint detection in the pathological type of lung cancer[J]. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), 2020, 66(6): 93-97.
13
王 茜,夏 睿,董惠霞,等. ProGRP、NSE、CEA、CYFRA21-1、SCC单独及联合检测在肺癌鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 临床检验杂志2020, 38(12): 930-932.
14
中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会肿瘤学分会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2021版)[J]. 中华医学杂志2021, 101(23): 1725-1757.
15
Yoshino K, Osumi H, Ito H, et al. Clinical usefulness of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(13): 8385-8393.
16
Clevers MR, Kastelijn EA, Peters B, et al. Evaluation of serum biomarker CEA and Ca-125 as immunotherapy response predictors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2021, 41(2): 869-876.
17
Yoon S, Lim YK, Kim HR, et al. Establishment of reference intervals of cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 in Korean adults[J]. Ann Lab Med, 2023, 43(1): 82-85.
18
Ouyang R, Wu S, Zhang B, et al. Clinical value of tumor-associated antigens and autoantibody panel combination detection in the early diagnostic of lung cancer[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2021, 32(3): 401-409.
19
Li J, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. The value of combined detection of CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and pro-GRP in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer[J]. Transl Cancer Res, 2021, 10(4): 1900-1906.
20
张 婷,向 波,林勇平. 肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌辅助诊断中的预测价值[J]. 中华预防医学杂志2021, 55(6): 786-791.
21
Zhang T, Xiang B, Lin YP. [Predictive value of combined detection tumor markers in the diagnosis of lung cancer][J]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2021, 55(6): 786-791.
22
Verttou CS, Vassiliou AG, Pratikaki M, et al. Comparative evaluation and prognostic utility of neuronal injury biomarkers in COVID-19 Patients: A prospective study[J]. Shock, 2022, 58(6): 507-513.
23
Luo H, Shen K, Sun H, et al. Clinical significance of serum neuron-specific enolase in gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(16):e19829.
24
Huang J, Xiao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Baseline serum tumor markers predict the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. BMC Cancer, 2023, 23(1): 812.
25
Wang CF, Peng SJ, Liu RQ, et al. The combination of CA125 and NSE is useful for predicting liver metastasis of lung cancer[J]. Dis Markers, 2020, 2020: 8850873.
26
刘亚杰,马晓波. 肿瘤标志物GSTP1、CYFRA21-1及SCC-Ag对非小细胞肺癌的预后评估价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2020, 30(14): 42-46.
27
Rumende CM, Sugianto G, Rinaldi I, et al. The association of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin-19 fragments 21-1 levels with one-year survival of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma at cipto mangunkusumo hospital: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Acta Med Indones, 2020, 52(2): 140-146.
28
Xu FZ, Zhang YB. Correlation analysis between serum neuron-specific enolase and the detection of gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2021, 13(2): 552-561.
29
Jiao Z, Cao S, LI J, et al. Clinical associations of preoperative and postoperative serum CEA and lung cancer outcome[J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2021, 8: 686313.
30
Yuan J, Sun Y, Wang K, et al. Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 686.
[1] 张礼江, 沈玲佳, 施我大. 倾向性评分匹配分析奥希替尼对晚期NSCLC 预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 820-822.
[2] 杨慧, 郭丽娟, 冯晓丹, 李静, 黄成谋, 蔡兴锐, 覃英娇, 王远礼. 非小细胞肺癌铂类药物耐药mi RNA表达特征及预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 719-724.
[3] 赖淼, 景鑫, 李桂珍, 李怡. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR 突变亚型的临床病理和预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 731-737.
[4] 梁丽斯, 李洁, 贺帅, 来艳君, 刘铭, 张琳. MMP-9、MMP-2 及TLR4、HE4对非小细胞肺癌早期诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 756-761.
[5] 赵蒙蒙, 黄洁, 余荣环, 王葆青. 过表达小GTP酶Rab32抑制非小细胞肺癌细胞侵袭性生长[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 512-518.
[6] 张桂萍, 丘勇林, 湛绮婷, 孙乐栋. 晚期非小细胞肺癌血清Ape1/Ref-1对放射性肺损伤发生的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 519-523.
[7] 韩晓宇, 李柯育, 赵志菲, 高建平. SNHG17过表达对非小细胞肺癌切除术预后的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 543-547.
[8] 刘松, 张进召, 贾艳云. 帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌反应降低与抗生素预处理的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 553-557.
[9] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[10] 汤畅通, 王永楠, 王诗筌. 颅脑外伤后阵发性交感神经兴奋患者的药物治疗效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 233-237.
[11] 胡志恒, 任洪波, 宋志远, 张运刚, 韩晓正. 血清sTIM-3及其配体Gal-9、CEACAM-1与创伤性颅脑损伤患者脑损伤程度及预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 201-207.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 崔伟, 邓屹, 叶苏意, 李静, 陈晓明, 张靖, 许荣德. 载药微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗罕见非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 303-310.
[14] 崔伟, 叶苏意, 邓屹, 陈晓明, 张靖, 李静, 许荣德. 载药微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗难治性非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 311-316.
[15] 崔伟, 李静, 陈晓明, 张靖, 邓屹, 许荣德. 载药微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗非小细胞肺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-295.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?